<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[ChatGPT vs. Real Tutors for marking Compo?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Curious to hear everyone’s thoughts on this!</p>
<p dir="auto">I used to try using ChatGPT to mark my son’s English compositions, but it was too “nice” and didn’t follow the strict Singapore MOE rubrics. It kept giving him high praises even when he missed the Situational Writing points.</p>
<p dir="auto">Recently, I stumbled upon a localized AI tool on Telegram (PSLE Marker Pro) that acts like a strict Senior HOD. It actually checks for the new 2026 “Inference Trap” and deducts marks if the story goes off-topic (which my son loves to do lol).</p>
<p dir="auto">I’m amazed at how accurate the PDF reports are compared to his actual school teacher’s feedback. Do you guys think AI will eventually replace composition marking for private tutors? Or is the human touch still needed?</p>
<p dir="auto">(I have a few free beta test credits for the bot if anyone wants to compare it against their current tutor’s marking. Just drop a comment!)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/111851/chatgpt-vs-real-tutors-for-marking-compo</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 09:55:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/111851.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 13:48:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>