<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Finish in 1hr....pls update feedback  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/5931/psle-2009-chinese-paper</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 20:43:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/5931.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:22:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:23:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Jennifer:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>justsay:</b><p>Jennifer, you are not alone. <br /><br />Scoring 80+ marks and T score is only 50 ? ...Arrgg.  :stupid:   Demoralising isn't it ?</p></blockquote></blockquote>My boy just broke the 70 pts hurdle, barely 80 pt.  Hiaz <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" />  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" /><p></p></blockquote>Remember, it is not the marks! It is the mean and the SD of the subject Vs the cohort. The best clue is to look at your child mean and SD per subject to guage his/her performance. If the pri school your child is in is one of the top school in Singapore (Sch students scoring at least 60% above A &amp; A* every year for the 3 subjects and 80% abv for Chinese subject), if your child consistently do above the 1st SD (add the SD mark to the mean score to see if your child mark is above it) for all the 4 subjects, your child would likely do well - top 10% of the PSLE cohort. We have to work on their languages as early as Pri 1 and not wait till their score is way below the mean of the school. I have tried almost everything for my Son since Pri 4 knowing that he is well below the school mean score for that subject but so far, I have not seen any improvement. Athough the PSLE Chinse paper is so much easier than the Sch's paper and the marking is probably very lenient (that accounts for the reason why nationally 80% got their A and A*), but, the chance of getting above the mean score can be very challenging. <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f64f.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--pray" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":pray:" alt="🙏" /><p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65117</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65117</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[P6boy-dad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:23:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:11:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Poonie:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Hi justsay<br /><br /><br />That's shocking low!  For estimate's sake, I plugged in the Std Deviation of 14 and Mean of 68 used by MOE at all school's presentation, I got a T score of 58 for a raw score of 80.  That works out to around 232.   Of course the SD and Mean change every year.</blockquote></blockquote>Now, that's why many parents these days try get their chidlren exempted from CL if the child realy struggling.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65109</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65109</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[karmeleon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:11:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:36:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>P6boy-dad:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Sorry to make you depressed. Actually it is quite easy to derive the mean marks and SD for Chinese. Firstly, around 80% of the candidates scored A &amp; A* almost every year. Therefore, the mean score would never be 75% and below. Secondly, Statistics 101 says that most students (34.1%) would fall between the 1st standard deviation on the left and right (layman) of the mean score. Meaning, adding or subtracting the SD to the mean score would cover the entire 1st SD left and right of the mean score. It also means that, only with a mean of 82-83 marks and a SD of 7-8 for Chinese would likely cover the entire right hand side of the mean score as 80% of the students obtain 75 and above. Every one SD in the T-score terms constitute 10 pts (+ on the left and - on the right). The next SD would be another 10 pts (2nd SD). If our child score 75 marks, the T-score for Chinese would be est. -9 (41) although it is an A grade. Those who score a high A grade of 90 would have scored a T-score of 9 (59). The difference is actually quite great. Even if you scored VERY well for your other 3 subjects, it would likely pull down your T-Score. For example, imagine scoring 70 pts (which is top 2.1% of the cohort) for all three subjects but with a score of 41 in Chinese, it would pull your score down to only 251. That is why, those who are very good in Chinese would definitely have an advantage. All the talk about giving language double weightage is not correct. Well, I am very concern for my boy too.   <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f64f.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--pray" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":pray:" alt="🙏" /> <br /></blockquote></blockquote>Thank you for sharing.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65013</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65013</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:36:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:35:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>justsay:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Jennifer, you are not alone. <br /><br />Scoring 80+ marks and T score is only 50 ? ...Arrgg.  :stupid:   Demoralising isn't it ?</blockquote></blockquote>My boy just broke the 70 pts hurdle, barely 80 pt.  Hiaz <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" />  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" /><p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65012</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65012</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:35:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:31:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi justsay<br /><br /><br />That’s shocking low!  For estimate’s sake, I plugged in the Std Deviation of 14 and Mean of 68 used by MOE at all school’s presentation, I got a T score of 58 for a raw score of 80.  That works out to around 232.   Of course the SD and Mean change every year.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65007</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65007</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Poonie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:31:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:19:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Lynn2:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">thanks for sharing.<br /><br /><br />Just wonder, how is the grade for science, as in A or A star affects the overall T score, is it as  much as CHINESE?Thanks</blockquote></blockquote>Firstly, if u may notice that every year all the three subjects (math, Sc, Eng), 41-43% of the cohort would obtain A &amp; A*. Statistically, i do not agree that every year there would be same % of students obtaining that score (of course nobody knows the % of A and A*). I am not sure if there is any adjustment/moderation etc. Even there is, it will not affect the relative scores of all students. What i m trying to say is that, it doesnt matter how your child scores in the subject but wat is important is that as long as relative to the cohort, your child must be above the mean score and his score is better than his/her peers. The T-score measures how well your child has done relative to the entire cohort. The mean score and SD should have already taken care of the papers' level of difficulty. In the case of Chinese, every mark counts as the mean is 'high' and SD is 'low' - the difference between scoring 90 and 75 marks for Chinese could mean a T-score of 18 pts (+ and -) difference. Honestly, if you peek at the results of schools like TaoNan (or most Hokkien WK), you will know what i mean - one year (07 or 08) almost 45% of the students score 250 and above. Such schools are reputated for their Chinese language. I must also qualify that the school (Tao Nan) was equally good in their English (80% A &amp;A*).<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65000</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/65000</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[P6boy-dad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:19:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:51:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Jennifer:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>P6boy-dad:</b><p>What i can say about the T-Score for Chinese is that, the mean score is VERY high at least 82 and the SD is about 7-8 marks. It means that your child has to score above 82 before he can obtain a T-score of 50 and above. Any marks below the mean score would result in score below 50 for Chinese. I am sure alot of parents dont realise that, thinking that as long as my child score 75 marks would be sufficient. That was why a student who scored 3A* and 1A (chinese) would get a score of 244. The A for Chinese would have given him a T-score of 41 if he scores only 75 marks.</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />Pls share how you get the numbers in the above computation.  Your post makes me depressed <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" /><p></p></blockquote>Jennifer, you are not alone. <br />Scoring 80+ marks and T score is only 50 ? ...Arrgg.  :stupid:   Demoralising isn't it ?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64971</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64971</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[justsay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:51:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:42:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing.<br /><br /><br />Just wonder, how is the grade for science, as in A or A star affects the overall T score, is it as  much as CHINESE?Thanks<br /><br /></p><blockquote><b>P6boy-dad:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>Jennifer:</b><p>[quote=\"P6boy-dad\"]What i can say about the T-Score for Chinese is that, the mean score is VERY high at least 82 and the SD is about 7-8 marks. It means that your child has to score above 82 before he can obtain a T-score of 50 and above. Any marks below the mean score would result in score below 50 for Chinese. I am sure alot of parents dont realise that, thinking that as long as my child score 75 marks would be sufficient. That was why a student who scored 3A* and 1A (chinese) would get a score of 244. The A for Chinese would have given him a T-score of 41 if he scores only 75 marks.</p></blockquote></blockquote>Pls share how you get the numbers in the above computation.  Your post makes me depressed <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" /><p></p></blockquote>Sorry to make you depressed. Actually it is quite easy to derive the mean marks and SD for Chinese. Firstly, around 80% of the candidates scored A &amp; A* almost every year. Therefore, the mean score would never be 75% and below. Secondly, Statistics 101 says that most students (34.1%) would fall between the 1st standard deviation on the left and right (layman) of the mean score. Meaning, adding or subtracting the SD to the mean score would cover the entire 1st SD left and right of the mean score. It also means that, only with a mean of 82-83 marks and a SD of 7-8 for Chinese would likely cover the entire right hand side of the mean score as 80% of the students obtain 75 and above. Every one SD in the T-score terms constitute 10 pts (+ on the left and - on the right). The next SD would be another 10 pts (2nd SD). If our child score 75 marks, the T-score for Chinese would be est. -9 (41) although it is an A grade. Those who score a high A grade of 90 would have scored a T-score of 9 (59). The difference is actually quite great. Even if you scored VERY well for your other 3 subjects, it would likely pull down your T-Score. For example, imagine scoring 70 pts (which is top 2.1% of the cohort) for all three subjects but with a score of 41 in Chinese, it would pull your score down to only 251. That is why, those who are very good in Chinese would definitely have an advantage. All the talk about giving language double weightage is not correct. Well, I am very concern for my boy too.   <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f64f.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--pray" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":pray:" alt="🙏" /> <br /><br /><br />I have attached the bell curve for your info<br /><br /><a href="http://www.postimage.org/">http://www.postimage.org/</a>[/quote]<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64969</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64969</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:42:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:38:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>P6boy-dad:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>Jennifer:</b><p>[quote=\"P6boy-dad\"]What i can say about the T-Score for Chinese is that, the mean score is VERY high at least 82 and the SD is about 7-8 marks. It means that your child has to score above 82 before he can obtain a T-score of 50 and above. Any marks below the mean score would result in score below 50 for Chinese. I am sure alot of parents dont realise that, thinking that as long as my child score 75 marks would be sufficient. That was why a student who scored 3A* and 1A (chinese) would get a score of 244. The A for Chinese would have given him a T-score of 41 if he scores only 75 marks.</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />Pls share how you get the numbers in the above computation.  Your post makes me depressed <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" /><p></p></blockquote>Sorry to make you depressed. Actually it is quite easy to derive the mean marks and SD for Chinese. Firstly, around 80% of the candidates scored A &amp; A* almost every year. Therefore, the mean score would never be 75% and below. Secondly, Statistics 101 says that most students (34.1%) would fall between the 1st standard deviation on the left and right (layman) of the mean score. Meaning, adding or subtracting the SD to the mean score would cover the entire 1st SD left and right of the mean score. It also means that, only with a mean of 82-83 marks and a SD of 7-8 for Chinese would likely cover the entire right hand side of the mean score as 80% of the students obtain 75 and above. Every one SD in the T-score terms constitute 10 pts (+ on the left and - on the right). The next SD would be another 10 pts (2nd SD). If our child score 75 marks, the T-score for Chinese would be est. -9 (41) although it is an A grade. Those who score a high A grade of 90 would have scored a T-score of 9 (59). The difference is actually quite great. Even if you scored VERY well for your other 3 subjects, it would likely pull down your T-Score. For example, imagine scoring 70 pts (which is top 2.1% of the cohort) for all three subjects but with a score of 41 in Chinese, it would pull your score down to only 251. That is why, those who are very good in Chinese would definitely have an advantage. All the talk about giving language double weightage is not correct. Well, I am very concern for my boy too.   <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f64f.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--pray" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":pray:" alt="🙏" /> <br /><br /><br />I have attached the bell curve for your info<br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.postimage.org/Ts1xP_90.png">http://www.postimage.org/Ts1xP_90.png</a>[/img][/url][/quote] :thankyou: for sharing.  <br /><br />Do you think the raw score has been moderated to achieve mean of 82 (I know it's estimated) ? Otherwise I am rather scepticle that so many can do so well.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64967</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64967</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[justsay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:38:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:15:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Jennifer:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>P6boy-dad:</b><p>What i can say about the T-Score for Chinese is that, the mean score is VERY high at least 82 and the SD is about 7-8 marks. It means that your child has to score above 82 before he can obtain a T-score of 50 and above. Any marks below the mean score would result in score below 50 for Chinese. I am sure alot of parents dont realise that, thinking that as long as my child score 75 marks would be sufficient. That was why a student who scored 3A* and 1A (chinese) would get a score of 244. The A for Chinese would have given him a T-score of 41 if he scores only 75 marks.</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />Pls share how you get the numbers in the above computation.  Your post makes me depressed <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" /><p></p></blockquote>Sorry to make you depressed. Actually it is quite easy to derive the mean marks and SD for Chinese. Firstly, around 80% of the candidates scored A &amp; A* almost every year. Therefore, the mean score would never be 75% and below. Secondly, Statistics 101 says that most students (34.1%) would fall between the 1st standard deviation on the left and right (layman) of the mean score. Meaning, adding or subtracting the SD to the mean score would cover the entire 1st SD left and right of the mean score. It also means that, only with a mean of 82-83 marks and a SD of 7-8 for Chinese would likely cover the entire right hand side of the mean score as 80% of the students obtain 75 and above. Every one SD in the T-score terms constitute 10 pts (+ on the left and - on the right). The next SD would be another 10 pts (2nd SD). If our child score 75 marks, the T-score for Chinese would be est. -9 (41) although it is an A grade. Those who score a high A grade of 90 would have scored a T-score of 9 (59). The difference is actually quite great. Even if you scored VERY well for your other 3 subjects, it would likely pull down your T-Score. For example, imagine scoring 70 pts (which is top 2.1% of the cohort) for all three subjects but with a score of 41 in Chinese, it would pull your score down to only 251. That is why, those who are very good in Chinese would definitely have an advantage. All the talk about giving language double weightage is not correct. Well, I am very concern for my boy too.   <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f64f.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--pray" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":pray:" alt="🙏" /> <br /><br /><br />I have attached the bell curve for your info<br /><br /><a href="http://www.postimage.org/">http://www.postimage.org/</a><p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64947</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64947</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[P6boy-dad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:15:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:58:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>P6boy-dad:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">What i can say about the T-Score for Chinese is that, the mean score is VERY high at least 82 and the SD is about 7-8 marks. It means that your child has to score above 82 before he can obtain a T-score of 50 and above. Any marks below the mean score would result in score below 50 for Chinese. I am sure alot of parents dont realise that, thinking that as long as my child score 75 marks would be sufficient. That was why a student who scored 3A* and 1A (chinese) would get a score of 244. The A for Chinese would have given him a T-score of 41 if he scores only 75 marks.</blockquote></blockquote><br />Pls share how you get the numbers in the above computation.  Your post makes me depressed <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f622.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--cry" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":cry:" alt="😢" /><p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64924</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64924</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:58:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:44:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>ApronMama:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>turquoise:</b><p>Thanks, Dharma. Am I correct to assume that generally, if a paper is easy, there will be a low t-score and that is not in the favour of those good in the subject. <br /><br /><br />Conversely, if the paper is very difficult with the general population performing poorly, then the ones who score very well will have a high T score?<br /><br />Thanks.</p></blockquote></blockquote>Could someone please help understand how the grade A*, A, B ...etc are determined for a simpler or a hard paper? Thanks!<p></p></blockquote>What i can say about the T-Score for Chinese is that, the mean score is VERY high at least 82 and the SD is about 7-8 marks. It means that your child has to score above 82 before he can obtain a T-score of 50 and above. Any marks below the mean score would result in score below 50 for Chinese. I am sure alot of parents dont realise that, thinking that as long as my child score 75 marks would be sufficient. That was why a student who scored 3A* and 1A (chinese) would get a score of 244. The A for Chinese would have given him a T-score of 41 if he scores only 75 marks.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64815</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64815</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[P6boy-dad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:44:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:00:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Anyone know where can i find the comprehesion about the apple?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64188</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64188</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zxkimikozx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:00:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:17:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">大公无私 has 2 meanings. 1) impartial 2) selfless</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64144</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64144</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[emerald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:17:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:06:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Augmum:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>Jetplane:</b><p>Well,<br /><br />I'm a student here.;D.<br />The Chinese paper was pretty alright<br />question 11, i chose 超出.<br />As for the 14th question, my answer was 照顾.<br /><br />I was just wondering, what's the ans for that passage, the last question,<br />which is the one with options like: 守望相助，见义勇为 etc. etc,<br />b'cos, i've read it again and again, but all options don't seem right to me.</p></blockquote></blockquote>same as my gal, she said none of the choices seem right.<br />when we went to check the creative dictionary for the EXACT MEANING of all words, the answer shd be \"da gong wu shi\". there are 2 meaning for it <br />1. being fair and justice 2. think of the welfare of others. (brief meaning)<br /><br />my gal said, \" in school, teacher only thought us the first meaning, never hear of people using this word for the second meaning.\" indeed tricky........<p></p></blockquote>Yep it should be 大公无私 as it's talking about the housewives 牺牲 their time to help the sch. So it should be 大公无私, which kinda means generous.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64142</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64142</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:06:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:24:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>ApronMama:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>caroline3sg:</b><p>Apronmama<br /><br />what beatrice meant is, after learning 弟子规, they find it easier to write 命题 作文 regarding values -- rude is not right.</p></blockquote></blockquote>OIC. I thought they wrote the same story.  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /><p></p></blockquote>my school learning di zi gui too. is like is better to write for ming ti as u can use like \"shen you shang yi qing you,de you shang yi qing xiu\" sry can't type chinese.it means if u do something wrong ur parents would be ashamed of ur misdeeds and letting them be ashame is an unfifial act.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64026</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/64026</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[acelancer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:24:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:10:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>caroline3sg:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Apronmama<br /><br />what beatrice meant is, after learning 弟子规, they find it easier to write 命题 作文 regarding values -- rude is not right.</blockquote></blockquote>OIC. I thought they wrote the same story.  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /><p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63995</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63995</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ApronMama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:10:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:04:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>ApronMama:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>beatrice:</b><p>the paper was very easy(im a student).  the compo was quite manageable but i think a lot students wrote the 命题 or at least in my class maybe its because my school is learning 弟子规. .</p></blockquote></blockquote><br /> You mean after learning 弟子规, I dare not be rude again? Is it sufficient to justify \"date not\" ? I thought the reason must be a 教训 kind of thing ..  :?<p></p></blockquote><br />Apronmama<br />what beatrice meant is, after learning 弟子规, they find it easier to write 命题 作文 regarding values -- rude is not right.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63990</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63990</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[caroline3sg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:04:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:37:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>beatrice:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">the paper was very easy(im a student).  the compo was quite manageable but i think a lot students wrote the 命题 or at least in my class maybe its because my school is learning 弟子规. .</blockquote></blockquote><br /> You mean after learning 弟子规, I dare not be rude again? Is it sufficient to justify \"date not\" ? I thought the reason must be a 教训 kind of thing ..  :?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63984</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63984</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ApronMama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:37:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:34:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Jetplane:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Well,<br /><br /><br />I was just wondering, what's the ans for that passage, the last question,<br />which is the one with options like: 守望相助，见义勇为 etc. etc,<br />b'cos, i've read it again and again, but all options don't seem right to me.</blockquote></blockquote>What is the exact sentence?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63982</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63982</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ApronMama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:34:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:25:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>karmeleon:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Anyway, now that I ask those people who's children have done it before, they just say...\"we're looking, looking, but somehow still cannot find the hardcopy!\"  Hmm....  :lol:   <br /><br /><br />Anyway, don't matter.  Apparently the compre is not exactly that difficult. <br /><br />What is terrible though is that those who've done it before can bulldose thru this question and spend loads of time with the rest of the paper. That's the irritating part.</blockquote></blockquote>I have got a story which sounds like it. At first, i thought it was the same. When i got home and digged for the paper, i found the story but it seems they have amended it. Its in an assessment book. And only 1 question was the same in the compre. But i believe its just 1 mark.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63978</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63978</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hello]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:25:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:11:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Jetplane:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">Well,<br /><br />I'm a student here.;D.<br />The Chinese paper was pretty alright<br />question 11, i chose 超出.<br />As for the 14th question, my answer was 照顾.<br /><br />I was just wondering, what's the ans for that passage, the last question,<br />which is the one with options like: 守望相助，见义勇为 etc. etc,<br />b'cos, i've read it again and again, but all options don't seem right to me.</blockquote></blockquote>same as my gal, she said none of the choices seem right.<br />when we went to check the creative dictionary for the EXACT MEANING of all words, the answer shd be \"da gong wu shi\". there are 2 meaning for it <br />1. being fair and justice 2. think of the welfare of others. (brief meaning)<br /><br />my gal said, \" in school, teacher only thought us the first meaning, never hear of people using this word for the second meaning.\" indeed tricky........<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63967</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63967</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Augmum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:11:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:06:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Well,<br /><br />I’m a student here.;D.<br />The Chinese paper was pretty alright<br />question 11, i chose 超出.<br />As for the 14th question, my answer was 照顾.<br /><br />I was just wondering, what’s the ans for that passage, the last question,<br />which is the one with options like: 守望相助，见义勇为 etc. etc,<br />b’cos, i’ve read it again and again, but all options don’t seem right to me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63906</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63906</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jetplane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:06:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2009 - Chinese Paper on Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:15:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>ApronMama:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>fish:</b><p>&gt; I was told that this year PSLE chinese paper 2 compre abt the apple, this compre some student have done b4. It was in circulation within some tuition centres &amp; some said that oso can found frm internet. How is it possible tat MOE took a compre passage tat have been in circulation</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />To be sure, what is the link of the website?<p></p></blockquote>Anyway, now that I ask those people who's children have done it before, they just say...\"we're looking, looking, but somehow still cannot find the hardcopy!\"  Hmm....  :lol:   <br /><br />Anyway, don't matter.  Apparently the compre is not exactly that difficult. <br /><br />What is terrible though is that those who've done it before can bulldose thru this question and spend loads of time with the rest of the paper. That's the irritating part.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63791</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/63791</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[karmeleon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:15:09 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>