<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>starlight1968sg:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>Jennifer:</b><p><a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/the-o-level-track-of-shame">http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/the-o-level-track-of-shame</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/about-6-of-students-likely-to-not-finish-ip">http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/about-6-of-students-likely-to-not-finish-ip</a><br /><br />For reading pleasure, not to start another round of debate.</p></blockquote></blockquote>There is already an active discussion on the above in the thread <br />IP vs O level<br /><a href="http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum">http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum</a> ... =48&amp;t=8667<p></p></blockquote><br />Sorry I did not know.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/85290/ri-s-o-level-scores-only-one-in-10-qualified-for-jc</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 04:26:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/85290.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 23:03:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Thu, 04 Feb 2016 22:54:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>Jennifer:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/the-o-level-track-of-shame">http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/the-o-level-track-of-shame</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/about-6-of-students-likely-to-not-finish-ip">http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/about-6-of-students-likely-to-not-finish-ip</a><br /><br />For reading pleasure, not to start another round of debate.</blockquote></blockquote>There is already an active discussion on the above in the thread <br />IP vs O level<br /><a href="http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum">http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum</a> ... =48&amp;t=8667<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1639024</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1639024</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[starlight1968sg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 22:54:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Thu, 04 Feb 2016 22:51:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/the-o-level-track-of-shame">http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/the-o-level-track-of-shame</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/about-6-of-students-likely-to-not-finish-ip">http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/about-6-of-students-likely-to-not-finish-ip</a><br /><br />For reading pleasure, not to start another round of debate.</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1639023</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1639023</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 22:51:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:25:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The boys feel sad NOT coz they cannot qualify for JC (i believe most understand Poly/other routes are more suitable for them). The boys feel sad coz they have to leave RI, the place where they have made spectacular achievements (in sports) and formed great friendships. To these boys, those wonderful 4 years they spent in RI are most precious &amp; memorable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1633123</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1633123</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[iFirefly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:25:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sun, 24 Jan 2016 02:20:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>hquek:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">塞翁失马，焉知非福. Road is long.... fall down, pick up and better things may be ahead.</blockquote></blockquote><br />Totally agree. And I believe sportsmen are among the most resilient. In the courts and in the pool, I've see kids fail, cry, console each other and return to compete again. Many of these kids know how to deal with losing and winning, and they also know that no matter how hard they train, they won't always win but when they do, the victory is sweet.<br /><br />These boys are likely among the top of their sport to get an RI DSA and even if they may not be the most academic, mentally they must be strong. If you have been in sports or have kids in sports, you will know that talent and effort will only bring you so far. Mental strength is key.<br /><br />There are kids who spend minimal time in CCA who score 20+ pts or fail the O levels and national athlete-level kids who score 6 pts. Already, these RI boys have achieved a lot more in their 16 years than most others. And they didn't fail their O lvls.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1633109</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1633109</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[3kiddos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 02:20:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 09:02:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>havok_ex:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">IMO it feels like a complacency problem by the Teachers. Even for Neighbourhood secondary schools, we have psle score of ~200 but we still can get below 20 and below 10. Did the students practice TYS? One of the students said that they felt smth was wrong while doing the o-level paper. Feels like he didn't practice the tys at all.</blockquote></blockquote><br />Could the teachers be unfamiliar with o level syllabus? From IP to o level track, teachers may not be aware of subjects/topics. The student who felt something was wrong while doing his exams must have had a shock then. But hope they will do well once they pick up and move on.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632888</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632888</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[janet88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 09:02:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 07:04:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>zulu:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>phtthp:</b><p>[quote=\"zulu\"]<br />Their GAT admission standard is <span style="\&quot;color:"> <b><b>lower</b></b> </span> than those applying thru DSA Academic. <br /><br />In RGS, the majority of <span style="\&quot;color:">those who apply for DSA Academic do <u><u>not </u></u>progress beyond the GAT test</span> whilst most who apply under Sports get called up for interviews.</p></blockquote></blockquote>you mean ... those who apply under DSA Academic domain : <br />need not sit for any GAT test ?<br /><br />while those who apply under DSA Sports domain : <br />also, no need to sit for any GAT test, just interview, can liao ?<p></p></blockquote><br />MS Academic- majority 'fail' to progress from GAT test to next level.<br /><br />Invited Sports Applicants- most progress from GAT test to interview.[/quote] <br /><br /><br />I believe the same test was administered but different passing benchmarks were taken based on the domain they were being evaluated.  This makes the test administration easier and also a student applying DSA via academic and sports /performing arts domains does not need to sit for multiple GATs.  Even across schools they seem to have standardized the test administered by a centralized institution this year but how each school interprets the results for each domain they need is decided by the school's own criteria and rightfully so.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632865</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632865</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sushi88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 07:04:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:51:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>hquek:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">塞翁失马，焉知非福. Road is long.... fall down, pick up and better things may be ahead.</blockquote></blockquote><br /> :goodpost:<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632808</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632808</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[janet88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:51:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:40:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">塞翁失马，焉知非福. Road is long… fall down, pick up and better things may be ahead.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632806</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632806</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hquek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:40:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:27:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>janet88:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">so sad for the boys who didn't make it to JC.</blockquote></blockquote><br />Don't think it is anything sad, maybe a little disappointing to those involved, but it could well be a blessing in disguise, too.  Who knows?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BlueBells]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:27:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:49:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>janet88:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>pirated:</b><p>[quote=\"janet88\"]so sad for the boys who didn't make it to JC.</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />Is not the end of the world. Half the cohort don't go to JC<p></p></blockquote>true, it's not the end of the world but it's shocking that only 1 out of 10 boys .[/quote]That's not an accurate statement. It's \"only 1 of the 10 boys <i><i>presumably with the weakest academic performance and hence streamed into the O level class</i></i> from a top elite boys' school didn't qualify for JC\".<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632796</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632796</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sharonkhoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:49:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:44:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>pirated:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>janet88:</b><p>so sad for the boys who didn't make it to JC.</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />Is not the end of the world. Half the cohort don't go to JC<p></p></blockquote>true, it's not the end of the world but it's shocking that only 1 out of 10 boys from top elite boys' school don't qualify for JC.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632794</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632794</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[janet88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:44:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 23:08:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>WeiHan:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>pirate:</b><p><br />Since when is a B average (24 points still B average) considered not pass O levels?</p></blockquote></blockquote>I was not refering to this case. Or maybe I should have phrased it this way...Does the top university accept sportsman that did sub par standard in the entrance examination and consider only his sports ability?<p></p></blockquote>I guess the assumption is that the said sportsman should be of \"university material\" in the first place, and should still have qualified for university at its minimum standards, which may not be as high as the \"cut-off\". Some allowance for lower grades due to training commitments may be given. But if the sportsman does not meet even the minimum criteria for admission, he would be foolish to attempt a university course, and the university would be unkind to allow him to. He would be just set up for failure.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632756</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632756</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sharonkhoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 23:08:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:17:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>janet88:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black">so sad for the boys who didn't make it to JC.</blockquote></blockquote><br />Is not the end of the world. Half the cohort don't go to JC<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632736</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632736</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pirated]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:17:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:16:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>harvardalum:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>StillThinking:</b><p><br />What does this have to do with US though?</p></blockquote></blockquote>Specific to this topic? No. Generally if top universities will consider? Yes. And unfortunately, the only ones I know are in the United States.<p></p></blockquote>Actually, to some extent, it's still relevant. <br />Some of the US sports scholarships are available to international students as well.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632717</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632717</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[floppy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:16:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:49:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I attended a leadership boot camp last year and here is one of the case studies that the trainer shared with us. I am not a fan of soccer so I have limited knowledge in this but I learnt that US Women Soccer is ranked among the world highest FIFA rating (or maybe highest rating). Every year, thousands of girls aspire to be part of this national team. The question thrown to us in the boot camp was 'what are the attributes or qualities that we see in this leader (refering to head coach Michael Zauzig)'?<br /><br /><br />Anyway, I thought this beautiful write-out is sort of related to our DSA sports students. While these students pursue their dreams or passion in whatever sports they are in, we should provide them a right study environment that can best balance both academic and athletics. Depending on the sports, life span of an average athletic probably ends around 30 - 35 years old? After the end of those glamorous days, unless they continue to be coaches, trainers etc, what are the other options available for them?<br /><br />Singapore needs schools just like SVC too!<br /><br />----------------------------------------------<br /><br />BENNINGTON, Vt. — For the fourth consecutive year, the Southern Vermont College women's soccer team has worked hard enough in the classroom to earn the National Soccer Coaches Association of America (NSCAA) College Team Academic Award as announced by the organization on Wednesday.<br /><br />The 2014-2015 accolade recognizes a 2014 SVC team that collectively posted a 3.45 grade point average in last year's academic period. \"It can be extremely difficult balancing academics and athletics,\" commented fifth year SVC head coach Michael Zauzig. \"I'm extremely proud of the commitment and focus the team has put on their studies. I'm happy that last year's team has kept this overwhelmingly positive tradition alive.\"<br /><br />Coach Zauzig has now seen each of his four previous Mountaineer teams work their way to collecting the team honor. \"It was always one of my first goals when I arrived at SVC,\" he continued. \"<b><b><span style="\&quot;color:">I wanted our team to excel in the classroom and on the field. I have always wanted our top two priorities being academics and athletics, in that order. </span></b></b>I want serious students and serious athletes; not only have the teams understood these priorities, but made them their own.\"<br /><br />\"<b><b><span style="\&quot;color:">I want our student-athletes to be well prepared for their professional careers when their collegiate career comes to an end</span></b></b>,\" added Zauzig. \"Being a student-athlete is a privilege, not a right. At times, we take both of these opportunities, academics and athletics, for granted. Both opportunities provide lessons and teach the student-athletes values that will help make them successful wherever they go.\"</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632698</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632698</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bggb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:49:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:39:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>StillThinking:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>harvardalum:</b><p>[quote=\"WeiHan\"]I was not refering to this case. Or maybe I should have phrased it this way...Does the top university accept sportsman that did sub par standard in the entrance examination and consider only his sports ability?</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />Yes. In the United States. Said sportsman may not be offered the coveted full sports scholarship but yes. If the sportsman has a \"sub-par\" B average, but excel in that sport, he'd have been approached, especially in sports like football (american) and basketball.<p></p></blockquote>What does this have to do with US though?[/quote]Specific to this topic? No. Generally if top universities will consider? Yes. And unfortunately, the only ones I know are in the United States.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632695</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632695</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[harvardalum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:39:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:09:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">so sad for the boys who didn’t make it to JC.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632682</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632682</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[janet88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:09:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:05:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>harvardalum:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>WeiHan:</b><p>[quote=\"pirate\"]<br />Since when is a B average (24 points still B average) considered not pass O levels?</p></blockquote></blockquote>I was not refering to this case. Or maybe I should have phrased it this way...Does the top university accept sportsman that did sub par standard in the entrance examination and consider only his sports ability?<p></p></blockquote>Yes. In the United States. Said sportsman may not be offered the coveted full sports scholarship but yes. If the sportsman has a \"sub-par\" B average, but excel in that sport, he'd have been approached, especially in sports like football (american) and basketball.[/quote]What does this have to do with US though?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632680</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632680</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[StillThinking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:05:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:57:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>WeiHan:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>pirate:</b><p><br />Since when is a B average (24 points still B average) considered not pass O levels?</p></blockquote></blockquote>I was not refering to this case. Or maybe I should have phrased it this way...Does the top university accept sportsman that did sub par standard in the entrance examination and consider only his sports ability?<p></p></blockquote>Yes. In the United States. Said sportsman may not be offered the coveted full sports scholarship but yes. If the sportsman has a \"sub-par\" B average, but excel in that sport, he'd have been approached, especially in sports like football (american) and basketball.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632674</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632674</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[harvardalum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:57:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:55:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>ChiefKiasu:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>Sutton:</b><p>...  I know of a GEP kid who went to one of the top-tier ip schools but did not perform as well as he should or thought. The kid was not happy in the ip school but remained in the school and had to sit for the 'O' levels and eventually got into a JC among the lowest rung. Over there, the kid performed well  and became one of the top performers there. Sometimes, when choosing a school for your kid, you just have to be realistic and find the right fit for them. Take a good hard look at your own kid and his/her learning style and personality, and not just the results. The results don't 100% tell you everything about your child. Not all can flourish in elite and top notch schools, especially IPs, and sending your child there does more harm than good and by the time we realise the mistake, it's too late. That's why we see students with 26X to 27X going for mid-tier Neighbourhood schools. <br /><br /><br />This episode is indeed a timely wake up call for parents to make the right call when choosing schools for our kids and not to clamour for elite schools regardless of their learning capabilities and interests. We are raising children, not flowers. Discover their passions and not your own.</p></blockquote></blockquote>An excellent post.  I have also seen many former IP students who didn't do well enough at A-Levels to get into the local universities.  For these students, that is a rude wake up call, and some do go into a downward spiral thinking that they are worthless.  It is hard breaking to see these good students lose their confidence and self-worth.  That is the reason why I feel that debate over appeals and secondary school COP overlooks the actual negative impact that squeezing into a school right at or below its COP, can have on the student.  It is better to excel in a normal school, than to wallow at the bottom of an elite school.<p></p></blockquote>But, do not forget there is affiliation.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632670</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632670</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[StillThinking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:55:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:39:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>pirate:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><br />Since when is a B average (24 points still B average) considered not pass O levels?</blockquote></blockquote>I was not refering to this case. Or maybe I should have phrased it this way...Does the top university accept sportsman that did sub par standard in the entrance examination and consider only his sports ability?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632664</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632664</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[WeiHan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:39:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:39:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>WeiHan:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>pirate:</b><p>[quote=\"WeiHan\"]I was pondering on that view too that society may have been too narrow in defining success...but then, I immediately start wondering what are the career prospects if one were to  develop along the sports line. Of course I am not familiar with this field.</p></blockquote></blockquote><br />Top universities also take in students for their sports prowess, you know? So, if the kid is national or SEA level...  <img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f937.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--shrug" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":shrug:" alt="🤷" /><p></p></blockquote>You mean the university admit them even when the sportsman don't even pass O level?<br /><br />That is a bright future, isn't it? Is hundreds miles better than having 5 points O level L1B5 but with no excellence sports achievements.[/quote]Since when is a B average (24 points still B average) considered not pass O levels?<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632636</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632636</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pirate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:39:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RI’s ‘O’ level scores: only one in 10 qualified for JC. on Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:03:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote><b>floppy:</b><blockquote style="border:1px solid black"><blockquote><b>jetsetter:</b><p>  <br /><br />...<br />5) Big 4 Advertising agencies (Creative Director, Art director - BIG $$)<br />...<br /><img src="https://forum.kiasuparents.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f60e.png?v=f4f27f6278e" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--sunglasses" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="8)" alt="😎" /> Graphic Designer / Interior designers (but not so big $$)</p></blockquote></blockquote>While training to a graphic illustrator, you could end up in a workshop teaching you how to eat fire and be part of the circus. Soon after, you could be drinking martini - shaken, not stirred, driving a Aston Martin and working for strange bosses named after alphabets.<br /><br />At least that's what happen to Pierce, sort of.<br /><br />Moral of the story:<br />L1R5 = 5, &lt; 5 or &gt; 5.<br />No one knows how the story will unfold in future.<p></p></blockquote> :rotflmao: <br />\"strange bosses named after alphabets\"!!!  And be labeled in numbers!   :siao: <br /><br />On (8), I was referring to those who are very strong in this aspect but not so strong academically, i.e. they went to a poly and graduated with only a diploma.  I don't remember knowing any graduates who are working as an illustrator or ID.  Maybe those in (5) could be graduates.  <br /><br />In any case, my point is of the 3, this is the most \"employable\" one to invest in and dump your resources on.  A sports career in Singapore isn't very promising.  They could become PE teachers with MOE, or coaches at SS or some tertiary institutions in Singapore.  Or be a commentator at ESPN or sports beat reporter with SPH/Mediacorp.  But they must be linguistically strong for a start.<p></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632546</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1632546</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jetsetter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:03:04 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>