<![CDATA[PSLE 2017 (COP)]]>

Harrychew:

It is 4 - 32, i.e. 29 distinct PSLE scores. I think people should should give the new system a chance to see how it works.

In each batch of O level students (prior to IP program), roughly 25% of students contested for slots in JCs, while the rest go to ITE or Poly. L1R5 possible scores are from 6 upwards, and JC cut off was set at 20. I recall the top 5 JCs were able to take in students scoring less than 12, and most of top students went to RJ or HC. In those years, L1R5 worked fairly well for the students going into JC, so I think the new changes will also work well for sorting out the top 30% of PSLE students.

I hope the new PSLE score will see the top 10% have scores spread across 4 to 10 points, instead of bunching up at 4 to 6 points. Probably MOE already has a good idea of how the students will be distributed based on current PSLE raw scores.
my estimation is this, would you see it is close to real or not?

al\tstream
4\ttop1
6\tesis
10\tip
16\tHMTL
17\texpress, uni
18\texpress, poly
19\tmean
21\texpress, poly
22\tna, poly
25\tna, poly
26\tnt, ite

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/topic/90210/psle-2017-copRSS for NodeSun, 19 Apr 2026 06:10:46 GMTSat, 01 Dec 2018 11:55:36 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 09 Mar 2018 03:06:10 GMT]]>SIS website is updated with the latest COP (2018 based on PSLE 2017):

http://sis.moe.gov.sg/

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1837157https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1837157Fri, 09 Mar 2018 03:06:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:21:29 GMT]]>Anglo Chinese School (Independent), 249 (O Level), 256 (IP)

Catholic High School, 250 (O Level), 253 (IP)
Cedar Girls’ Secondary School, 249 (O Level), 254 (IP)
CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls’ School, 253 (O Level), 256 (IP)
Dunman High School, 255 (IP)
Hwa Chong Institution (Secondary), 258 (IP)
Methodist Girls’ School, 254 (O Level), 260 (IP)
Nanyang Girls’ High School, 264 (IP)
National Junior College, 256 (IP)
Raffles Girls School, 260 (IP)
Raffles Institution (Secondary), 257 (IP)
River Valley High School, 250 (IP)
Singapore Chinese Girls’ School, 250 (O Level), 252 (IP)
St Joseph’s Institution, 244 (O Level), 253 (IP)
Temasek Junior College 249 (IP)
Victoria School, 246 (O Level), 252 (IP)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Admiralty Secondary School\t
Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary School
Anderson Secondary School\t
Anglican High School\t
Anglo-Chinese School (Barker Road)
Ang Mo Kio Secondary School\t
Assumption English School

Bartley Secondary School\t
Beatty Secondary School\t
Bedok Green Secondary School\t
Bedok South Secondary School\t
Bedok View Secondary School\t
Bendemeer Secondary School\t
Bishan Park Secondary School\t
Boon Lay Secondary School\t
Bowen Secondary School\t224 (Express)
Broadrick Secondary School\t
Bukit Batok Secondary School\t
Bukit Merah Secondary School, 188 (Express)\t
Bukit Panjang Government High School, 244 (Express)
Bukit View Secondary School


Canberra Secondary School\t
Changkat Changi Secondary School
CHIJ Katong Convent (Secondary)\t225 (Express)
CHIJ Secondary (Toa Payoh)\t243 (Express)
CHIJ St. Joseph’s Convent\t
CHIJ Saint Theresa’s Convent, 235 (Express)
Chong Boon Secondary School\t
Chua Chu Kang Secondary School 211 (Express)
Christ Church Secondary School\t
Chung Cheng High School (Main), 242 (Express)\t
Chung Cheng High School (Yishun)
Clementi Town Secondary School, 231 (Express)\t
Commonwealth Secondary School\t, 237 (Express)\t
Compassvale Secondary School\t210 (Express)
Crescent Girls’ School 241 (Express)

Damai Secondary School\t
Deyi Secondary School\t215 (Express)
Dunearn Secondary School\t
Dunman Secondary School 229 (Express)

East Spring Secondary School\t
East View Secondary School\t
Edgefield Secondary School\t226 (Express)
Evergreen Secondary School

Fairfield Methodist Secondary School\t241 (Express)
Fajar Secondary School\tGovernment\t
Fuchun Secondary School
Fuhua Secondary School 232

Gan Eng Seng School 223 (Express)
Geylang Methodist School 224 (Express)
Greendale Secondary School\t203 (Express)
Greenridge Secondary School\t
Greenview Secondary School\t
Guangyang Secondary School 188 (Express)

Hai Sing Catholic School\t
Hillgrove Secondary School\t
Holy Innocents’ High School\t
Hong Kah Secondary School\t
Hougang Secondary School\t
Hua Yi Secondary School, 221 (Express)

Junyuan Secondary School\t
Jurong Secondary School, 224 (Express)\t
Jurong West Secondary School 195 (Express)
Jurongville Secondary School\t
Juying Secondary School

Kent Ridge Secondary School\t
Kranji Secondary School\t 229 (Express)
Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary School 232 (Express)

Loyang Secondary School\t
Loyang View Secondary School

Manjusri Secondary School\t
Maris Stella High School, 235 (Express)
Marsiling Secondary School\t
Mayflower Secondary School\t219 (Express)
Meridian Secondary School\t
Montfort Secondary School 204 (Express)

Nan Chiau High School, 243 (Express)
Nan Hua High School, 243 (Express)
Naval Base Secondary School\t
New Town Secondary School\t
Ngee Ann Secondary School\t237 (Express)
North Vista Secondary School\t
Northbrooks Secondary School\t
Northland Secondary School\tGovernment\t
NUS High School of Mathematics and Science

Orchid Park Secondary School\t
Outram Secondary School\t

Pasir Ris Crest Secondary School\t215 (Express)
Pasir Ris Secondary School\t
Paya Lebar Methodist Girls’ School (Secondary), 216 (Express)\t
Peicai Secondary School\t
Peirce Secondary School\t
Ping Yi Secondary School\t
Presbyterian High School, 232 (Express)
Punggol Secondary School 194 (Express)

Queenstown Secondary School\t
Queensway Secondary School 214 (Express)

Regent Secondary School\t
Riverside Secondary School

Sembawang Secondary School\t
Seng Kang Secondary School\t
Serangoon Garden Secondary School\t
Serangoon Secondary School\t
Shuqun Secondary School\t
Springfield Secondary School\tGovernment\t
St. Anthony’s Canossian Secondary School\t
St. Gabriel’s Secondary School \t222 (Express)
St. Hilda’s Secondary School 228 (Express)
St. Margaret’s Secondary School, 241 (Express)\t
Swiss Cottage Secondary School

Tampines Secondary School\t
Tanjong Katong Girls’ School, 231 (Express)
Tanjong Katong Secondary School\t
Teck Whye Secondary School\t
Temasek Secondary School\t231 (Express)

Unity Secondary School

West Spring Secondary School 220 (Express)\t
Westwood Secondary School\t
Whitley Secondary School\t
Woodgrove Secondary School 204 (Express)
Woodlands Ring Secondary School\t
Woodlands Secondary School\t

Xinmin Secondary School

Yio Chu Kang Secondary School\t
Yishun Secondary School
Yishun Town Secondary School\t235 (Express)
Yuan Ching Secondary School\t
Yuhua Secondary School\t
Yusof Ishak Secondary School\t
Yuying Secondary School\t
Zhenghua Secondary School\t
Zhonghua Secondary School

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1835568https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1835568Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:21:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 13:43:15 GMT]]>

Harrychew:
ss2:

But from 2021 the range of points we get is very narrow compared to the range now.

there may be ard 1000s kids with same points ,so it will get really difficult.Many kids might have all 6 choices not available for them.
The new change is going to make it more and more difficult for kids.

Now kids may be pushed to get distinctions in CCA to get DSA.

Isn't the new points system similar to how O level result is computed for JC admission? Based on past experience, the JC admission seems to work rather well, so I am not too pessimistic for upcoming change.

In terms of space in top schools, I think there should be sufficient places. Afterall if you count only HCI, RI, RGS and NYGH there are already 1600 places. The other IP/IB schools will have several thousands more.

And it may not be as easy to score the minimum 4 points. I am sure the folks in MOE will design the exam such that roughly only top 1 to 3 percent of students will get 4 points. Top 10% maybe around 7 - 8 points.

Yes, I would say this is not totally a new scoring system. They simply tweak from the current O level scoring system and applied to new PSLE scoring system.

In fact, sometimes I suspect a 8 points (raw score) & below for O level is the top 10%.
Not using nett score.

Even JCs are looking at \"raw score\" (eg. 8 points & below) to offer scholarships and raw score (eg. 10 points & below) to offer 4 H2 subjects combination, etc.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1834118https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1834118Sun, 18 Feb 2018 13:43:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 06:26:35 GMT]]>

pirate:
ss2:

Completely agreed .This is not going to serve intended purpose to reduce stress for the kids.It is goinv to add more fuel as kids need to excel really well if need to go top school.


Majority of stress for kids caused by parents lah. 🦆

Totally agree.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1826343https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1826343Wed, 03 Jan 2018 06:26:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 06:12:53 GMT]]>Seems like there is very little input on the PSLE 2017 COP in this thread…is there another thread on this?

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1826340https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1826340Wed, 03 Jan 2018 06:12:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:33:49 GMT]]>

ss2:
Completely agreed .This is not going to serve intended purpose to reduce stress for the kids.It is goinv to add more fuel as kids need to excel really well if need to go top school.

Majority of stress for kids caused by parents lah. 🦆

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825544https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825544Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:33:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:08:34 GMT]]>

Harrychew:
NotEducatedMan:

[quote=\"Harrychew\"].

Isn't the new points system similar to how O level result is computed for JC admission? Based on past experience, the JC admission seems to work rather well, so I am not too pessimistic for upcoming change.

By using results of 4-20 points to spread over to 20 or even 16 JCs is totally different if try to spread over to 150 sec schs (express steam)

It works well for JAE to JC doesn't mean it will works well on JAE to S1

It is 4 - 32, i.e. 29 distinct PSLE scores. I think people should should give the new system a chance to see how it works.

In each batch of O level students (prior to IP program), roughly 25% of students contested for slots in JCs, while the rest go to ITE or Poly. L1R5 possible scores are from 6 upwards, and JC cut off was set at 20. I recall the top 5 JCs were able to take in students scoring less than 12, and most of top students went to RJ or HC. In those years, L1R5 worked fairly well for the students going into JC, so I think the new changes will also work well for sorting out the top 30% of PSLE students.

I hope the new PSLE score will see the top 10% have scores spread across 4 to 10 points, instead of bunching up at 4 to 6 points. Probably MOE already has a good idea of how the students will be distributed based on current PSLE raw scores.[/quote]Each batch, let's say out of 40,000 psle students, assuming 30,000 fighting for places in the express steam.
So top 10% is 3,000 students.
If 3,200 students scored 4 points, so how to determine exactly which students is the top 10%?
Or let's say 500 students scored 4 points , 1,500 students scored 5 points & 2,500 students scored 6 points, again how to determine who is the top 10% (3,000 students)? Likewise to top 30%.

Well, at next stage, out of these 30,000 express student, 12,000 student went to JCs

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825541https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825541Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:08:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:37:22 GMT]]>

laughingcat:
Harrychew:

I hope the new PSLE score will see the top 10% have scores spread across 4 to 10 points, instead of bunching up at 4 to 6 points. Probably MOE already has a good idea of how the students will be distributed based on current PSLE raw scores.


Precisely....hope to be able to see that range.

You will need to ask MOE. Though we can make an educated guess based on today's PSLE scores of A*, A and B. Roughly top 1% of PSLE scorer has 4A*, top 2 to 5% has 3A* and 1A etc.

In the new scoring system, today's top 1% should score the minimum 4 pts with 4 x AL1. Also my guess is that today's A grade is split into AL2, AL3 and AL4. The range of grades from AL2 to AL4 should help to separate the better students.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825521https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825521Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:37:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:34:03 GMT]]>

Harrychew:
I hope the new PSLE score will see the top 10% have scores spread across 4 to 10 points, instead of bunching up at 4 to 6 points. Probably MOE already has a good idea of how the students will be distributed based on current PSLE raw scores.

Precisely....hope to be able to see that range.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825493https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825493Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:34:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:19:44 GMT]]>

NotEducatedMan:
Harrychew:

.

Isn't the new points system similar to how O level result is computed for JC admission? Based on past experience, the JC admission seems to work rather well, so I am not too pessimistic for upcoming change.

By using results of 4-20 points to spread over to 20 or even 16 JCs is totally different if try to spread over to 150 sec schs.

It works well for JAE to JC doesn't mean it will works well on JAE to S1

It is 4 - 32, i.e. 29 distinct PSLE scores. I think people should should give the new system a chance to see how it works.

In each batch of O level students (prior to IP program), roughly 25% of students contested for slots in JCs, while the rest go to ITE or Poly. L1R5 possible scores are from 6 upwards, and JC cut off was set at 20. I recall the top 5 JCs were able to take in students scoring less than 12, and most of top students went to RJ or HC. In those years, L1R5 worked fairly well for the students going into JC, so I think the new changes will also work well for sorting out the top 30% of PSLE students.

I hope the new PSLE score will see the top 10% have scores spread across 4 to 10 points, instead of bunching up at 4 to 6 points. Probably MOE already has a good idea of how the students will be distributed based on current PSLE raw scores.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825489https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825489Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:19:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:59:19 GMT]]>The issue with the new PSLE grading scheme is that you have to score 1 in all four subjects to get into a top school. You don’t have to be excellent at all four subjects, just good enough to get 1. No longer can you use a strong subject to pull up a weaker subject for a high t-score. So what if you score 99 in English, Math and Chinese but get 74 for Science. You’re out of the running for the top schools despite being in the top 5% of the population for 3 of your 4 subjects. I guess that’s how redistribution of top students will take place.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825484https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825484Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:59:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:23:39 GMT]]>

ss2:
NotEducatedMan:

[quote=\"Harrychew\"].

Isn't the new points system similar to how O level result is computed for JC admission? Based on past experience, the JC admission seems to work rather well, so I am not too pessimistic for upcoming change.

By using results of 4-20 points to spread over to 20 or even 16 JCs is totally different if try to spread over to 150 sec schs.


It works well for JAE to JC doesn't mean it will works well on JAE to S1

Completely agreed .This is not going to serve intended purpose to reduce stress for the kids.It is goinv to add more fuel as kids need to excel really well if need to go top school.[/quote]Ehhhh...actually with the wider banding, the lower 4-pointers will have chance to get into the top schools under the new system. Under the current system these kids wouldn’t be able to get into the top schools.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825474https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825474Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:23:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:09:21 GMT]]>

NotEducatedMan:
Harrychew:

.

Isn't the new points system similar to how O level result is computed for JC admission? Based on past experience, the JC admission seems to work rather well, so I am not too pessimistic for upcoming change.

By using results of 4-20 points to spread over to 20 or even 16 JCs is totally different if try to spread over to 150 sec schs.


It works well for JAE to JC doesn't mean it will works well on JAE to S1

Completely agreed .This is not going to serve intended purpose to reduce stress for the kids.It is goinv to add more fuel as kids need to excel really well if need to go top school.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825472https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825472Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:09:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:47:36 GMT]]>

Harrychew:
.

Isn't the new points system similar to how O level result is computed for JC admission? Based on past experience, the JC admission seems to work rather well, so I am not too pessimistic for upcoming change.
By using results of 4-20 points to spread over to 20 or even 16 JCs is totally different if try to spread over to 150 sec schs.

It works well for JAE to JC doesn't mean it will works well on JAE to S1

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825467https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825467Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:47:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:14:33 GMT]]>

pirate:
Harrychew:

In terms of space in top schools, I think there should be sufficient places. Afterall if you count only HCI, RI, RGS and NYGH there are already 1600 places. The other IP/IB schools will have several thousands more.


Perhaps the whole idea is to spread more 'top' students around and get rid of the HCI, RI, RGS and NYGH fixation (and stratification), which honestly, is getting a bit out of hand.

Probably will fail, because if you look at history of JCs vast majority of top students went to RJ and HC in spite of L1R5. The only benefit I see is that it may lessen the meaningless competition of parents and kids comparing T score down to last digit. It is rather senseless to rank a kid with 250 to be worse than another with 251.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825457https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825457Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:14:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 05:23:06 GMT]]>

Harrychew:
In terms of space in top schools, I think there should be sufficient places. Afterall if you count only HCI, RI, RGS and NYGH there are already 1600 places. The other IP/IB schools will have several thousands more.

Perhaps the whole idea is to spread more 'top' students around and get rid of the HCI, RI, RGS and NYGH fixation (and stratification), which honestly, is getting a bit out of hand.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825439https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825439Fri, 29 Dec 2017 05:23:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 04:33:17 GMT]]>

Harrychew:
And it may not be as easy to score the minimum 4 points. I am sure the folks in MOE will design the exam such that roughly only top 1 to 3 percent of students will get 4 points. Top 10% maybe around 7 - 8 points.

Would really like to know what is the general bell curve like? As in majority in which range of points.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825430https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825430Fri, 29 Dec 2017 04:33:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 04:07:54 GMT]]>

ss2:
But from 2021 the range of points we get is very narrow compared to the range now.

there may be ard 1000s kids with same points ,so it will get really difficult.Many kids might have all 6 choices not available for them.
The new change is going to make it more and more difficult for kids.

Now kids may be pushed to get distinctions in CCA to get DSA.
Isn't the new points system similar to how O level result is computed for JC admission? Based on past experience, the JC admission seems to work rather well, so I am not too pessimistic for upcoming change.

In terms of space in top schools, I think there should be sufficient places. Afterall if you count only HCI, RI, RGS and NYGH there are already 1600 places. The other IP/IB schools will have several thousands more.

And it may not be as easy to score the minimum 4 points. I am sure the folks in MOE will design the exam such that roughly only top 1 to 3 percent of students will get 4 points. Top 10% maybe around 7 - 8 points.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825425https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825425Fri, 29 Dec 2017 04:07:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:54:13 GMT]]>My boy will be 2nd batch as he is born in 2010. So how does affiliation works under this new change? Will there be a COP set for affiliation?

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825416https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825416Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:54:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:22:32 GMT]]>

laughingcat:
cool_hi:




Sadly,My son will be affected...1st batch kena all these drastic changes..&actually creating much more stress..why does MOE claim that the changes reduce stress?!? :siao:
Haiz!!! Wish we had “created” my son 2-3months earlier(he is born in mid Feb 😢 ) :sad:


SAME HERE!!! 😢 😢 😢 My ah boy born in Jan!!!!! :frustrated: :frustrated: :frustrated: :frustrated:

Haiz!! I feel u!!
U even more “dui”..just 2-3 weeks difference & kena so many drastic changes :stupid:
第一次深深感受到生不逢时的悲哀和无奈 :sad:

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825411https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825411Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:22:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:21:17 GMT]]>So based on the 2021 PSLE scoring band, what is the majority score based on the bell curve? :?

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825408https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825408Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:21:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:14:48 GMT]]>

cool_hi:
Milly13:

[quote=\"Tokidoki\"]Dun understand why so much concern over drop of COP for RI.

Isn't it good that more kids are eligible to get in.

For those 257 but didn’t select RI as 1st choice as never expect it could drop so much will be upset I guess.


If RI is THE school one desires to go to,should still put as 1st choice to try,as for now it’s still entirely by Merit...
Whereas for 2021 psle batch,1st batch no t-score & also 1st batch school allocation NOT entirely by merit & order of choice is taken into consideration(meaning a person with lower score but put school A as 1st choice,will get in 1st..& if u put school A as your 2nd choice but score better,u may not get school A if vacancies already filled up... :stompfeet: )

Sadly,My son will be affected...1st batch kena all these drastic changes..&actually creating much more stress..why does MOE claim that the changes reduce stress?!? :siao:
Haiz!!! Wish we had “created” my son 2-3months earlier(he is born in mid Feb 😢 ) :sad:[/quote]
SAME HERE!!! 😢 😢 😢 My ah boy born in Jan!!!!! :frustrated: :frustrated: :frustrated: :frustrated:

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825406https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825406Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:14:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to PSLE 2017 (COP) on Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:28:05 GMT]]>

NotEducatedMan:
With this new PSLE scoring system. It may solve one problem but at the same time created more problems.


Using bell curve to spread 4-20 pointers to16 JCs is acceptable. But how can simply apply this 4-20 points system for JAE to Sec 1?

Nothing is perfect but the current PSLE scoring it has been working fine after so many years by using bell curve to spread 188-260+ pointers to 150 sec sch for express steam
It might not turn into surprise if this happens in long run many secondary schools might need to merge or close down like what is happening with JCs.

]]>https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825370https://forum.kiasuparents.com/post/1825370Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:28:05 GMT