WeiHan:We have to be careful that, probably, if the student COP gets higher, it becomes increasingly more difficult to value-add. Having said that, I have to acknowledge that RV is one rare school that has high COP (always higher than 250) and yet can still value-add (academic).[/quote]Well said, mate!fully agree. RI/RGS/HCI/NYG took in the best every year. good results are expected but have these schools value-add to the students? think not.rosecy:[quote=\"wonderm\"]
For the brand name and prestige?
In my view, even if we want to narrow the comparison to academic of 2 schools, it is quite meaningless to simply look at % of As or number of awards won at competitions. We have to ask ourselves whether such \"better results\" are due to better students intake (due to different COP) or due to the value-add from school. More importantly, we really have to ask ourselves, what such % really mean to our kid. If he is getting As and winning award, does it matter if his school has a lower % than another school? Reversely, if our kids are not getting As and not winning awards, so what their school has a higher % than another school?
In short, we know all these schools mentioned are good schools and that's more than enough. The rest is really up to each child. Not forgetting academic result is just one aspect of education.
just done a search on MOE website. RV received the Sustained Achievement Award for Academic Value-Added for 2007 & 2008 (last O lvl cohort) while DHS has never got it. SAA is for 3 consecutive years of achievement. So RV already value adds her students since 2005.
:celebrate: