Population woes
-
They are already doing that. Just that the effect may not be felt so soon and may not be seen by most.
You point about fraudulent qualifications. MOM does random checks, as to do 100% checks will mean a long wait for all businesses to obtain the necessary manpower to continue running their business. I lost a very good staff as her certs were questionable, not proven fraudulent but due to the changes in qualification criteria she no longer meets the standard. It is also getting harder to renew employment passes for these staff. I held back on expanding because of staffing issues, local and otherwise. Quite a few fellow business owners have indicated that as well.
And give business owners some credit lah. They do have common sense too ya know. Why in the world would anyone hire someone just because they are cheap if they are not able to perform. And even if they do make the mistake of hiring a cheap lousy staff who cannot perform they will not retain them. -
lim72:
I really hope that I don't have to tell my ds this cruel truth.
If it's a truth, it's a truth. If people elsewhere can do things as well but more cheaply than Singapore, then it's not just your DS, but all of us that need face up to it.
The competition will occur, whether you like it or not, the only question is whether you prefer them to be competing with you for jobs IN Singapore, but at least contributing to the strength of the local economy, or competing with you from OUTSIDE Singapore, and potentially beating you and sucking the jobs out of the country.
I know what I prefer. -
3Boys:
I prefer to be a foreigner in Singapore than a foreigner elsewhere.. that I know for sure. Ive learned to love this country as much as my own, my daughter was born and currently being raised here.. she will feel uprooted if we move somewhere else.lim72:
I really hope that I don't have to tell my ds this cruel truth.
If it's a truth, it's a truth. If people elsewhere can do things as well but more cheaply than Singapore, then it's not just your DS, but all of us that need face up to it.
The competition will occur, whether you like it or not, the only question is whether you prefer them to be competing with you for jobs IN Singapore, but at least contributing to the strength of the local economy, or competing with you from OUTSIDE Singapore, and potentially beating you and sucking the jobs out of the country.
I know what I prefer. -
zarahsmom:
why can't your company pay the local salary= (FT's pay + levy)?
Perhaps the manufacturing (precision instrument) industry is a bit of an exception rather than the norm. I am pretty sure that in the IT industry particularly IT in banking/finance...as I am part of the decision making panel in terms of salary benchmarking.. its more expensive to hire foreigners..(again due to levy... if you are going to compare apples to apples==let us say am comparing a local graduate with exactly the same qualification as a foreign graduate.. the foreign graduate will still cost us more)..
btw, EP got levy meh? since when? -
lim72:
That is exactly what I'm trying to point out. The employer who was interviewed by bbc didn't mention quality but emphasized on the 'cheapness'of these foreign graduates. He assumed these graduates were good based on the assumption that they were from one of the 'top' universities. So are you prepared to tell your kids that based on same qualification, if you are not cheap enough, you can't compete with these foreigners. I really hope that I don't have to tell my ds this cruel truth.
Do I detect some hubris here? Are employers supposed to assume that someone is good merely because he is from a local university? I know that engineers from the top universities in China can build a nuclear power plant and send a manned rocket into space. I am not so sure that our engineers can. -
limlim:
btw, EP got levy meh? since when?
EP is now $4,000 a month. Our local graduates still cannot compete? I think they need a wake-up call. -
pirate:
These kind of projects that you gave as examples require many engineers to work on - a few hundreds to a few thousands working as a team. Singapore isn't ready to pour in this size of resource for these kind of projects.lim72:
That is exactly what I'm trying to point out. The employer who was interviewed by bbc didn't mention quality but emphasized on the 'cheapness'of these foreign graduates. He assumed these graduates were good based on the assumption that they were from one of the 'top' universities. So are you prepared to tell your kids that based on same qualification, if you are not cheap enough, you can't compete with these foreigners. I really hope that I don't have to tell my ds this cruel truth.
Do I detect some hubris here? Are employers supposed to assume that someone is good merely because he is from a local university? I know that engineers from the top universities in China can build a nuclear power plant and send a manned rocket into space. I am not so sure that our engineers can. -
Perhaps it is more prevalent in certain industries. I know of 2 then-fresh graduates who received multiple offers last year.
-
WeiHan:
These kind of projects that you gave as examples require many engineers to work on - a few hundreds to a few thousands working as a team. Singapore isn't ready to pour in this size of resource for these kind of projects.[/quote]Perhaps. But that does not detract from the point that they have knowhow that our local universities may not have. I will therefore be slow to make the assumption that they cannot be good merely because they are from universities in China, which is implicit in the bolded part. There is no reason to assume that the top universities in a country with the capability to send up manned rockets is not at least comparable to our local ones. That is the hubris I was referring to. Universities like Beijing and Qinghua are considered world class. Even graduates from universities there that are not as well-known here such as Xiamen and Jiaotong are able to stand their own against our local graduates at any time.pirate:
[quote=\"lim72\"]That is exactly what I'm trying to point out. The employer who was interviewed by bbc didn't mention quality but emphasized on the 'cheapness'of these foreign graduates. He assumed these graduates were good based on the assumption that they were from one of the 'top' universities. So are you prepared to tell your kids that based on same qualification, if you are not cheap enough, you can't compete with these foreigners. I really hope that I don't have to tell my ds this cruel truth.
Do I detect some hubris here? Are employers supposed to assume that someone is good merely because he is from a local university? I know that engineers from the top universities in China can build a nuclear power plant and send a manned rocket into space. I am not so sure that our engineers can.
I may sound harsh, but I am particularly unhappy with this kind of hubris circulating amongst our local graduates. A variant of which I have encountered is that an upper second from our local U is comparable to a first from universities in the UK. Go and ask any employer anywhere in the world whether an upper second from our local universities is comparable to a first from the likes of Oxford, Cambridge, London or Bristol and they will laugh. -
pirate:
They might employ an S Pass \"graduate\".. S Pass levy not that much.limlim:
btw, EP got levy meh? since when?
EP is now $4,000 a month. Our local graduates still cannot compete? I think they need a wake-up call.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login