Proposal to Scrap PSLE in Pilot Cluster of Schools
-
I think it is consolidation time instead of keep thinking of making changes.
Let’s start with:
Removal of exams in P1/P2, has it been a success? -
not having to sit for that high stake exam at the end of 6 years of education definitely lessens the stress level...especially for kids who are less academically inclined...but what a minister mentioned about secondary school placement is the worrying issue. where will these kids eventually go to?
Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC MP Hri Kumar Nair said he is in favour of scrapping the PSLE, but only if there is a better solution for secondary school placement.
Mr Nair said: \"The devil will be in the details. If you have some schools which are set up differently, who will gain entry into these schools?
\"Who will get priority if these schools turn out to be popular?
\"At the end of the 10-year programme, what sort of exams will the students sit for? Is it going to be O-level, or are they going to do an IP (Integrated Programme) and go straight to A-level?\" -
It’s not a bad idea, but I don’t think it will change anything much. Those parents who are most concerned about kids being in the ‘right’ or ‘best’ schools will then move their concerns and strategems to P1 registration and the final exams rather than the PSLE (assuming that there will be new 10-yr schools created). If not, how will they deal with the sec school placement? However they do it, it can be regarded as stressful.
If all concerned are willing to focus on education as opposed to exam grades, and focus on motivating kids to learn rather than ace exams, then it’s an OK system. My kids have been in the US system where there are no major exams till the end of high school (effectively, the SAT and APs around 11th grade), and there are kids who slack all the way, kids who work hard all the way, kids who slack until the last 2 yrs etc. What makes the difference between a high achiever and a those who do poorly are natural intelligence, motivation, discipline, thirst for learning etc. Some will be stressed because of internal drive or parental pressure even when there are no major exams. I think the main problem with the PSLE is the importance attached to it by parents and teachers, not the ‘system’.
By the way, I have no quibble with trying to ace exams. I just feel that many Singapore teachers and parents tend to focus too much on exams too early. My daughter started preparation for PSLE less than a year before the exams, and only did it on a part-time basis as we were overseas. I don’t think it was less effective than the Singapore schools’ way of preparing 2 yrs or more ahead. That gave her a lot more time to study more widely and take more risks without always checking to see how something would be marked. But when we reached the last 3 mths, we told her to focus on the exams and go for it. It’s not an all-or-nothing choice. -
Agree with slmkhoo, if the mindset does not change, all external changes made in policy will not change anything or it gives a superficial feel that things have changed until reality sets in again.
-
sushi88:
I'm interested to know the effects of this too. Have some schools re-introduced exams in P2? And are the constant assessments in place of Mid-Years and EYAs less stressful?I think it is consolidation time instead of keep thinking of making changes.
Let's start with:
Removal of exams in P1/P2, has it been a success? -
my daughter has semestral tests every 10 weeks in p1/2…that means ca1, sa1, ca2 and sa2 still happened…reason being is if there is completely no test of any kind, they will not know how to handle an exam. at the end of p2, there is a SA2 for streaming purposes.
the whole idea of education is on learning, not being graded.
i remember when my son was in p3, he was marked wrong for a science open-ended…my hubby approached his teacher…the teacher told him that the answer was marked wrong because it was not in line with psle standard. -
jtoh:
My DD had her first exam at the end of P2. No ranking was given in report card and no streaming until upper primary. Some parents did highlight that it could result in complacency and give false sense of adequacy for weaker students.
I'm interested to know the effects of this too. Have some schools re-introduced exams in P2? And are the constant assessments in place of Mid-Years and EYAs less stressful?sushi88:
I think it is consolidation time instead of keep thinking of making changes.
Let's start with:
Removal of exams in P1/P2, has it been a success?
In our case, it has been relaxing. DD took each topical and unit test in her stride. We took advantage of the downtime to enjoy external enrichment. -
janet_lee88:
Having assessment and exam is not the issue. What they do with the results/grades is. Coz if after having these, there is no ranking and every class in the next level is a mixed ability class, then who will bother?my daughter has semestral tests every 10 weeks in p1/2...that means ca1, sa1, ca2 and sa2 still happened...reason being is if there is completely no test of any kind, they will not know how to handle an exam. at the end of p2, there is a SA2 for streaming purposes.
the whole idea of education is on learning, not being graded.
i remember when my son was in p3, he was marked wrong for a science open-ended...my hubby approached his teacher...the teacher told him that the answer was marked wrong because it was not in line with psle standard. -
janet_lee88:
But being graded is part of the feedback loop of learning. Without feedback, how is the student to know his achievements or weaknesses? No PSLE can't mean no grading of any kind all the way through school. Even in the US system where there are no major exams for 12 yrs, there are constant tests and semestral exams. The difference is that parents, teachers and students (mostly) don't worry too much about them. There are still those who do, mostly the Asians! (read Tiger Mom)my daughter has semestral tests every 10 weeks in p1/2...that means ca1, sa1, ca2 and sa2 still happened...reason being is if there is completely no test of any kind, they will not know how to handle an exam. at the end of p2, there is a SA2 for streaming purposes.
the whole idea of education is on learning, not being graded.
i remember when my son was in p3, he was marked wrong for a science open-ended...my hubby approached his teacher...the teacher told him that the answer was marked wrong because it was not in line with psle standard.
Yes, what Janet mentions, about working to PSLE standards from P3, is exactly what I feel should be avoided. As long as the child shows the right level of understanding, it should be accepted. Why work towards an exam 3 yrs in the future? PSLE standards should be applied in P6, not before.