* Nanyang JC (NYJC)
-
Crester:
Please don't put words into my mouth. You should be the one to cool down.
I put 31-32% now as I realized NYJC cohort is usually 700. This batch can be 700 or lesser( have retain people so lesser)candyfan:
Hi Crester, in the link below, you had deleted the % of pupils with at least 3H2 and a pass in GP of 31% for NYJC. Why did you do so after others had posted better results such as RVHS 32.6%, DHS 39.5% and NJC 46% and VJC approx 50%?
Now you claimed NYJC's to be 31-32%. According to my niece who was present in the hall, this figure wasn't announced to them at all. Morever, the UAP of 81 is probably an estimate as no JC would have a perfect whole number as its UAP. If it is more than 81, it will be announced as 81.xx and hence her take is NYJC UAP is 80.xx.
http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum ... &start=230
If its about 700, then can be 31.5....%
If its about 690.., then can be 32%. I'm not sure of the exact cohort size.
But the number of students with pass in GP is as it is, I don't wish to elaborate..
If you don't belief, please don't.
I delected earlier as only stating the UAP will do.
Here I stated as its NYJC forum. NYJC forum I can state more.
If you don't belief the figure, then please don't.
Your niece was there.You said UAP not mentioned by the P.
I'm going to say that I heard the Principal say its 81. Just 81 he said.
If all of you choose not to belief, then don't.
I don't know about the whole number or decimal point number.
P said only 1 whole number.
Ok, please ask your niece who was the teacher/ teachers involved in the released of A results inside the hall addressing the students before P went up stage?
Your niece should know if she inside hall. Please ask her.
I don't wish to pursue but I want people to know I was really inside hall.
I feel this is just for sharing forum. If you think you don't belief, then don't.
Don't need to be uptight.
Try to 'listen' and understand the contents of my post, and in future other posts, before jumping to conclusion in order to make yourself more credible in future.
Hint: Check our contents in bold blue and figure out what you had misinterpreted. -
candyfan:
Please don't put words into my mouth. You should be the one to cool down. Try to 'listen' and understand the contents of my post, and in future anybody's posts, before commenting to make yourself credible.
I put 31-32% now as I realized NYJC cohort is usually 700. This batch can be 700 or lesser( have retain people so lesser)Crester:
[quote=\"candyfan\"]
Hi Crester, in the link below, you had deleted the % of pupils with at least 3H2 and a pass in GP of 31% for NYJC. Why did you do so after others had posted better results such as RVHS 32.6%, DHS 39.5% and NJC 46% and VJC approx 50%?
Now you claimed NYJC's to be 31-32%. According to my niece who was present in the hall, this figure wasn't announced to them at all. Morever, the UAP of 81 is probably an estimate as no JC would have a perfect whole number as its UAP. If it is more than 81, it will be announced as 81.xx and hence her take is NYJC UAP is 80.xx.
http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum ... &start=230
If its about 700, then can be 31.5....%
If its about 690.., then can be 32%. I'm not sure of the exact cohort size.
But the number of students with pass in GP is as it is, I don't wish to elaborate..
If you don't belief, please don't.
I delected earlier as only stating the UAP will do.
Here I stated as its NYJC forum. NYJC forum I can state more.
If you don't belief the figure, then please don't.
Your niece was there.You said UAP not mentioned by the P.
I'm going to say that I heard the Principal say its 81. Just 81 he said.
If all of you choose not to belief, then don't.
I don't know about the whole number or decimal point number.
P said only 1 whole number.
Ok, please ask your niece who was the teacher/ teachers involved in the released of A results inside the hall addressing the students before P went up stage?
Your niece should know if she inside hall. Please ask her.
I don't wish to pursue but I want people to know I was really inside hall.
I feel this is just for sharing forum. If you think you don't belief, then don't.
Don't need to be uptight.
Hint: Check our contents in bold blue and figure out what you had misinterpreted.[/quote]Im not upset, i just to tell you guys i was in the hall.
Ok, you said the figure not announced to them right. Wish to add on by saying the announcer of the result is by the P , no one else, so I said earlier ' the UAP not mentioned by P' even though you never said it.
So can you ask your niece who the teacher/teachers involved?
Also, ask her what was the First presentation on the stage when the event started?
Ok ok, I listened to your advice of 'understanding the contents of people's post' in future...
So please ask your niece. -
It seems like you still do not get it. My niece said the 3H2 distinctions % wasn’t mentioned. You had already admitted it was an estimation on your part as you do not know the cohort size too. I did not say my niece did not hear about the UAP. She interpreted the UAP as a round-off figure. The actual UAP could be 80.xx. Do you understand now?
-
Crester, to put it bluntly, I have no doubt you were present in NYJC on the day the A level results were released although your kid is still in JC1 only. Why? Because you give me the impression of a very very super kiasu parent that is almost out of control.
:rotflmao: -
candyfan:
It seems like you still do not get it. My niece said the 3H2 distinctions % wasn't mentioned. You had already admitted it was an estimation on your part as you do not know the cohort size too. I did not say my niece did not hear about the UAP. She interpreted the UAP as a round-off figure. The actual UAP could be 80.xx. Do you understand now?
Oh, I can get you.
So your niece heard the 81 UAP right? I didn't say wrongly right.
If she or others choose to take it as 80.. , then take it that way. What I wanted to say was the P announced 81. That's it.
Whether its 80.. or can 81... then P round off to whole num I really don't
I was there. I calculated the figures.
So please ask your niece about my questions to her. Thanks. -
ParkYuni:
Crester, to put it bluntly, I have no doubt you were present in NYJC on the day the A level results were released although your kid is still in JC1 only. Why? Because you give me the impression of a very very super kiasu parent that is almost out of control.
:rotflmao:
Finally, you belief I was there.
Well, Im super ks. Its ok.
This is NYJC forum.
Lets not be like that. -
mookata:
I understand your concerns as a parent about the discipline issue, but flexibility isn't always a bad thing. Hope I gave a clear big picture about nyjc though!
Thank you for sharing. For sure there are many parents who like their kids jcs to be flexible although I am an exception.
I was just a little disappointed as I had expected NYJC results to be better and closer to VJC based on its recent COP:
2014 COP of JC for 2015 JC1 admission:
NYJC (7/8) VJC (5/6) ACJC (6/7) TJC (7/8)
2015 COP of JC for 2016 JC1 admission:
NYJC(6/7) VJC (5/6) ACJC (7/7) TJC (9/9)
However, 2015 A level results are similar between NYJC, ACJC and TJC but all differ much from that of VJC. -
Crester:
Have I ever mentioned you were not 'there'? Being there and reporting the correct figures are separate issues. You seem to have problems with numbers and interpreting forummers' comments correctly. As someone had highlighted to you, read carefully before you conclude. You are representing NYJC in this forum.ParkYuni:
Crester, to put it bluntly, I have no doubt you were present in NYJC on the day the A level results were released although your kid is still in JC1 only. Why? Because you give me the impression of a very very super kiasu parent that is almost out of control.
:rotflmao:
Finally, you belief I was there.
Well, Im super ks. Its ok.
This is NYJC forum.
Lets not be like that.
Refer link first post:
http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum ... &start=350 -
Crester:
You are a strange person. I am speechless. :yikes:
So please ask your niece about my questions to her. Thanks. -
KTKS:
I agree that there is no difference between the standards of teaching for nyjc, acjc and tjc.mookata:
I understand your concerns as a parent about the discipline issue, but flexibility isn't always a bad thing. Hope I gave a clear big picture about nyjc though!
Thank you for sharing. For sure there are many parents who like their kids jcs to be flexible although I am an exception.
I was just a little disappointed as I had expected NYJC results to be better and closer to VJC based on its recent COP:
2014 COP of JC for 2015 JC1 admission:
NYJC (7/8) VJC (5/6) ACJC (6/7) TJC (7/8)
2015 COP of JC for 2016 JC1 admission:
NYJC(6/7) VJC (5/6) ACJC (7/7) TJC (9/9)
However, 2015 A level results are similar between NYJC, ACJC and TJC but all differ much from that of VJC.
Due to the latest cop of 6, 7 and 9 for nyjc, acjc and tjc science stream, respectively, speculation has it that nyjc has higher value-added into its jc and hence its surge in popularity. Now it is proven to be untrue.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login