2019 PSLE Discussions and Strategies (Children born in 2007)
-
Frankly , 2 marks lost in LC is equivalent to 1 mark . Will it really differentiate A vs A*.
I think the losing of one mark can get it back from Paper II and composition. -
jj_1808\" post_id=\"1936783\" time=\"1569292640\" user_id=\"31403:
a bit early to assume,
Frankly , 2 marks lost in LC is equivalent to 1 mark . Will it really differentiate A vs A*.
I think the losing of one mark can get it back from Paper II and composition.
there are other components - oral ( u dunno how much will get) , compo, written paper etc -
Ellybelly\" post_id=\"1936781\" time=\"1569292403\" user_id=\"179810:
Wow u mean the kids remembers all the answer numbers for the qns they put down???? li hai leh.......
Hi, thanks for sharing. Can I check if there's typo for the Chinese LC?Kiasu everyday\" post_id=\"1936753\" time=\"1569257006\" user_id=\"180930:[quote=\"Kiasu everyday\" post_id=1936753 time=1569257006 user_id=180930]Hi everyone! So I'm here to just share the answers for Chinese LC and English LC. All answers are ACCURATE, feel free to ask me anytime if you have any doubts. Multiple debates have been taken.
____Chinese LC_______
Q1. 1. Q8. 2
Q2. 2. Q9. 3
Q3. 2. Q10. 1
Q4. 2
Q5. 3
Q6. 1
Q7. 3
_____English LC_______
( For now, I will only type out answers from q8 - q20, aka the questions without pictures for referring answer, because I need time to remember the answers before q8 lol)
Q8. 1. Q17.3
Q9. 3. Q18.2
Q10.1. Q19.3
Q11. 2. Q20.1
Q12.3
Q13.3
Q14. 3
Q15. 2
Q16.( I don't remember the number
but it's the answer that days the queen wants to admire the flowers with her people)
Cos Q7, Q8 are different (hers in a swopped order for Q7/8) from a previous answer scheme given by PandaPanda DD's teacher.
Cos there are a few kids who have the same answers to answers by PandaPanda n Q7 n 8 are I think not an issue ....most kids don't remember these as tricky.
Only q1.
Thanks .[/quote] -
lee_yl\" post_id=\"1936760\" time=\"1569284245\" user_id=\"17023:Yeah, thus in a way it's not really bad news or disadvantage to majority of the students. Instead, it's just slight advantage to the (supposedly) cream of the crop (or the lucky ones who guessed correctly
The cruel reality is every mark is important. There's always the possibility that you were 1 mark away from a different grade (although of course, ultimately it's the total aggregate score than matters most) or from being eligible for another stream.
). MyPillow\" post_id=\"1936784\" time=\"1569292988\" user_id=\"70594:
a bit early to assume,jj_1808\" post_id=\"1936783\" time=\"1569292640\" user_id=\"31403:[quote=jj_1808 post_id=1936783 time=1569292640 user_id=31403]Frankly , 2 marks lost in LC is equivalent to 1 mark . Will it really differentiate A vs A*.
I think the losing of one mark can get it back from Paper II and composition.
there are other components - oral ( u dunno how much will get) , compo, written paper etc
That said, it's definitely time to move on to the written papers beginning this Thursday. :rahrah:
Yup, this won't be the only tricky question. Another way to sieve out the A*s from the As is via marking scheme. It will be tweaked according to difficulty of the components/papers.
For example, in separate years when I was involved in the marking, there was a difference in how the below was graded/penalized -->
Q) 为什么小明... ...?
A) 因为他... ...。
0.5 marks was deducted in certain years because start of answer did not state who the 他 is, whereas for some years, students who wrote such answers were \"let off\". -
chenlaoshi\" post_id=\"1936789\" time=\"1569293802\" user_id=\"162894:
but schools have been teaching that its ok to write ying wei ta cos its understood its referring to xiao ming. That means schools have been wrong?
The cruel reality is every mark is important. There's always the possibility that you were 1 mark away from a different grade (although of course, ultimately it's the total aggregate score than matters most) or from being eligible for another stream. That said, it's definitely time to move on to the written papers beginning this Thursday. :rahrah:
Yup, this won't be the only tricky question. Another to sieve out the A*s from the As is via marking scheme. It will be tweaked according to difficulty of the components/papers.
For example, in separate years when I was involved in the marking, there was a difference in how the below was graded/penalized -->
Q) 为什么小明... ...?
A) 因为他... ...。
0.5 marks was deducted in certain years because start of answer did not state who the 他 is, whereas for some years, students who wrote such answers were \"let off\". -
Dino\" post_id=\"1936790\" time=\"1569293994\" user_id=\"6726:
The answer is separate from the question. Thus, we ought to mention his name right at the start before using 他. (因为小明... ...他... ... 他... ...)。
but schools have been teaching that its ok to write ying wei ta cos its understood its referring to xiao ming. That means schools have been wrong?chenlaoshi\" post_id=\"1936789\" time=\"1569293802\" user_id=\"162894:
The cruel reality is every mark is important. There's always the possibility that you were 1 mark away from a different grade (although of course, ultimately it's the total aggregate score than matters most) or from being eligible for another stream. That said, it's definitely time to move on to the written papers beginning this Thursday. :rahrah:
Yup, this won't be the only tricky question. Another to sieve out the A*s from the As is via marking scheme. It will be tweaked according to difficulty of the components/papers.
For example, in separate years when I was involved in the marking, there was a difference in how the below was graded/penalized -->
Q) 为什么小明... ...?
A) 因为他... ...。
0.5 marks was deducted in certain years because start of answer did not state who the 他 is, whereas for some years, students who wrote such answers were \"let off\".
I think you will notice that different schools and different teachers have different 'demands' or advise. From my students and the kids who attended my workshops, I have heard different feedbacks - some must copy entire question before adding 因为，some can begin with 因为 directly, some were taught to use 这是因为 (and then some were told not too) - similarly like compo, some teachers forbid the use of flashback, and for compre the 从哪里可以看出 question, some were taught not to use 从\"... ...\"可以看出 while others were told that they must stick to that style.
For PSLE marking, the HOD will attend meeting with SEAB before sharing in department briefing the marking scheme (this is usually towards end of Term 2/start of Term 3). During the PSLE marking days, if certain trends were noticed, they will be raised, decisions will then be made and info on how to grade/penalize will be disseminated across the marking centres. -
chenlaoshi\" post_id=\"1936794\" time=\"1569294692\" user_id=\"162894:
The answer is separate from the question. Thus, we ought to mention his name right at the start before using 他. (因为小明... ...他... ... 他... ...)。Dino\" post_id=\"1936790\" time=\"1569293994\" user_id=\"6726:
[quote=chenlaoshi post_id=1936789 time=1569293802 user_id=162894]
The cruel reality is every mark is important. There's always the possibility that you were 1 mark away from a different grade (although of course, ultimately it's the total aggregate score than matters most) or from being eligible for another stream. That said, it's definitely time to move on to the written papers beginning this Thursday. :rahrah:
Yup, this won't be the only tricky question. Another to sieve out the A*s from the As is via marking scheme. It will be tweaked according to difficulty of the components/papers.
For example, in separate years when I was involved in the marking, there was a difference in how the below was graded/penalized -->
Q) 为什么小明... ...?
A) 因为他... ...。
0.5 marks was deducted in certain years because start of answer did not state who the 他 is, whereas for some years, students who wrote such answers were \"let off\".
but schools have been teaching that its ok to write ying wei ta cos its understood its referring to xiao ming. That means schools have been wrong?
I think you will notice that different schools and different teachers have different 'demands' or advise. From my students and the kids who attended my workshops, I have heard different feedbacks - some must copy entire question before adding 因为，some can begin with 因为 directly, some were taught to use 这是因为 (and then some were told not too) - similarly like compo, some teachers forbid the use of flashback, and for compre the 从哪里可以看出 question, some were taught not to use 从\"... ...\"可以看出 while others were told that they must stick to that style.
For PSLE marking, the HOD will attend meeting with SEAB before sharing in department briefing the marking scheme (this is usually towards end of Term 2/start of Term 3). During the PSLE marking days, if certain trends were noticed, they will be raised, decisions will then be made and info on how to grade/penalize will be disseminated across the marking centres.[/quote]Omg..... like that jialat leh..... -
Dino\" post_id=\"1936802\" time=\"1569295709\" user_id=\"6726:
Omg..... like that jialat leh.....[/quote]Just need to subscribe to the mentality of \"not leaving things to chance\". No harm in writing a few words more if it helps to avoid the possibility of being deducted marks.
The answer is separate from the question. Thus, we ought to mention his name right at the start before using 他. (因为小明... ...他... ... 他... ...)。chenlaoshi\" post_id=\"1936794\" time=\"1569294692\" user_id=\"162894:
[quote=Dino post_id=1936790 time=1569293994 user_id=6726]
but schools have been teaching that its ok to write ying wei ta cos its understood its referring to xiao ming. That means schools have been wrong?
I think you will notice that different schools and different teachers have different 'demands' or advise. From my students and the kids who attended my workshops, I have heard different feedbacks - some must copy entire question before adding 因为，some can begin with 因为 directly, some were taught to use 这是因为 (and then some were told not too) - similarly like compo, some teachers forbid the use of flashback, and for compre the 从哪里可以看出 question, some were taught not to use 从\"... ...\"可以看出 while others were told that they must stick to that style.
For PSLE marking, the HOD will attend meeting with SEAB before sharing in department briefing the marking scheme (this is usually towards end of Term 2/start of Term 3). During the PSLE marking days, if certain trends were noticed, they will be raised, decisions will then be made and info on how to grade/penalize will be disseminated across the marking centres.
For example, if the answer involve 2 characters of the same gender (such as 女儿 and 妈妈), then avoid using 她 throughout the answer, just state their name/identity - in fact, even if it's different gender, as long as it involves 2 or more characters, should also do that, because they are cases where 他 became 她 and vice versa.
Another example, 从哪里可以看出小明不愿意帮妈妈的忙？
从“... ...”可以看出。 vs 从“... ...”可以看出小明不愿意帮妈妈的忙。 -
[/quote]
Wow u mean the kids remembers all the answer numbers for the qns they put down??? li hai leh…
[/quote]
Dino i asked mine they couldnt remember all. Only Qn1 can remember haha…those kids can remember all the answers…li hai!! -
patlsy79\" post_id=\"1936806\" time=\"1569296252\" user_id=\"65743:
haha same same here.......
Dino i asked mine they couldnt remember all. Only Qn1 can remember haha...those kids can remember all the answers..li hai!!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login