Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary

[Trapwithin]

verykiasu2010:

6 years is quite risky ..... hopefully the VP is allowed to take over of the P if she is transferred

High profile school usually get P from externally posting.

[verykiasu2010]

Trapwithin:

verykiasu2010:

6 years is quite risky ..... hopefully the VP is allowed to take over of the P if she is transferred

High profile school usually get P from externally posting.

not necessary. VP could be promoted to P. Best is promote the VP for the sake of continuity especially in the area of culture and practises, systems and processes.....

existing parents of PH kids would have vested interested in this area, unless the VP is not up to standard ...... politically wrong for me to say it here ... but..

[dyh]

Mum1113:

Not sure what I heard was true plus looking at 100% eligibility to secondary school per 2010 posting results, just make me wonder what I heard was true..........heard there is one P6 retainee this year, is this true ? Anyone heard or know about this ?

Am curious as thought that MOE has revamped the system such that there is no more retainees but rather there is ITE for poor performance students . Those days of retainees were gone isnt it true ? Or am just not up-to-date ?!

I think I saw in the chart that the 100% was referring to students who take the 4 normal subjects. this means it does not take into account pupils who take foundation subject or less than 4 subjects.

[IJJ]

I am totally impressed by last year PSLE results. Very impressive! I think this year, PH will be very hot for P1 registration. Aren’t we glad we are over it?

[dyh]

verykiasu2010:

Trapwithin:

[quote=\"verykiasu2010\"]6 years is quite risky ..... hopefully the VP is allowed to take over of the P if she is transferred

High profile school usually get P from externally posting.

not necessary. VP could be promoted to P. Best is promote the VP for the sake of continuity especially in the area of culture and practises, systems and processes.....

existing parents of PH kids would have vested interested in this area, unless the VP is not up to standard ...... politically wrong for me to say it here ... but..[/quote]Anyway, I heard that P regards VP very highly. If i am not wrong, VP was brought in by P from the same GEP school she came from.

[IJJ]

dyh:

Mum1113:

Not sure what I heard was true plus looking at 100% eligibility to secondary school per 2010 posting results, just make me wonder what I heard was true..........heard there is one P6 retainee this year, is this true ? Anyone heard or know about this ?

Am curious as thought that MOE has revamped the system such that there is no more retainees but rather there is ITE for poor performance students . Those days of retainees were gone isnt it true ? Or am just not up-to-date ?!

I think I saw in the chart that the 100% was referring to students who take the 4 normal subjects. this means it does not take into account pupils who take foundation subject or less than 4 subjects.

Year 2009, the chart shows 1 student under foundation programme. Year 2010, there is none indicated, hence, the 100% eligilibility for secondary school, I understand as 100% of the entire cohort. I could be wrong... :?

Edited to add : My child just told me she heard one student failed PSLE too??? But the result did not reflect? Or they rounded off?

[IJJ]

dyh:

Anyway, I heard that P regards VP very highly. If i am not wrong, VP was brought in by P from the same GEP school she came from.

May I know they came from which GEP school?

[Trapwithin]

IJJ:

dyh:

Anyway, I heard that P regards VP very highly. If i am not wrong, VP was brought in by P from the same GEP school she came from.

May I know they came from which GEP school?

St Hilda

[Trapwithin]

Just read the stats. Science is still the weakest link.

[IJJ]

Trapwithin:

St Hilda

Thanks, Trapwithin!