Q&A - PSLE English
-
meimeitan:
(1) It was my mother who reported the matter to the police, not my aunt.(1) My mother reported the matter to the police. My aunt did not report it.
It ________________________________________________________
(2) The boy took some money from the drawer. His mother walked in.
No sooner __________________________________________________
(2) No sooner had the boy taken some money from the drawer than his mother walked in
Rgds
R -
anneshirleygilbert:
Answer is (1).Question : \"Did you eat my cake?\" Jane asked Tom.
Should it be (1) : Jane asked Tom if he had eaten her cake.
Or should it be (2) : Jane asked Tom if he ate her cake.
Normally when we rewrite from direct to indirect speech, we push the verb one step into the past. Thus:
If direct speech is in the present tense, then indirect speech becomes past simple.
If direct speech is in the past simple, then indirect speech becomes past perfect.
If direct speech is in the past perfect, then indirect speech remains past perfect because we cannot push back further.
Rgds
R -
Kloggy:
This answer is preferable to the 'correct' answer. It captures the notion that each student, with the exception of Jason, was given one goodie bag.1. Everyone was given a free goodie bag at the opening ceremony except Jason.
All _______________________________________
Correct answer is :All but Jason were given free goodie bags at the opening ceremony.
Is the following acceptable ?
All but Jason were given a free goodie bag at the opening ceremony.
The 'correct' answer is ambiguous in that it implies that each student, with the exception of Jason, was given more than one goodie bag.Kloggy:
No. Combined sentences should retain antecedents and referents unless these are repeated.2. I did not realise how difficult the course was. That was why I signed up.
Had ________________
Ans given : Had I realised how difficult the course was, I would not have signed up for it.
Qn : is the 'for it' at the end needed ? Can the answer just be :
Had I realised how difficult the course was, I would not have signed up.Kloggy:
Still grammatically correct. The use of the comma here is one of style, not grammar.3. The children were amazed. The magician pulled a rabbit out of an empty hat.
_____________________ much to __________________
My qn here is on punctuation. In the following answer, if the comma was omitted, is it still grammatically correct :
The magician pulled a rabbit out of an empty hat, much to the children's amazement.
Rgds
R -
jamestancx997:
Wrong. All of them, with the exception of Jason, were indeed given just one goodie bag each: look at the source sentences.1. It is acceptable but not the best answer, because of ambiguity. It could also be taken to mean all of them were given just one goodie bag, without the word \"each\" at the end of the phrase. Since you don't need to stretch it so far from the original, just pluralize \"goodie bags\".
jamestancx997:
True that 'sign up' is informal, but wrong about referents. See my answer to the original poster.2. Acceptable. \"Sign up\" is terminology in common parlance. No reason why \"for it\" should be absolutely compulsory.
jamestancx997:
Possibly true, but are you sure that 'much to the children's amazement' is a clause?3. For clarity of clausal separation a comma is strongly recommended.
Hope you feel more enlightened.
Rgds
R -
definitely more enlightened, thank you!
-
Thank you, meimeitan and Ridcully.
-
ridcully:
1. You are mistaken about the meaning of my sentences. I mean the same thing as you: that everyone was given 1 goodie bag, so for clarity it should read \"one goodie bag each\", failing which it is perfectly acceptable to say they were collectively given goodie bags.
Wrong. All of them, with the exception of Jason, were indeed given just one goodie bag each: look at the source sentences.jamestancx997:
1. It is acceptable but not the best answer, because of ambiguity. It could also be taken to mean all of them were given just one goodie bag, without the word \"each\" at the end of the phrase. Since you don't need to stretch it so far from the original, just pluralize \"goodie bags\".
jamestancx997:
True that 'sign up' is informal, but wrong about referents. See my answer to the original poster.2. Acceptable. \"Sign up\" is terminology in common parlance. No reason why \"for it\" should be absolutely compulsory.
jamestancx997:
Possibly true, but are you sure that 'much to the children's amazement' is a clause?3. For clarity of clausal separation a comma is strongly recommended.
Hope you feel more enlightened.
Rgds
R
2. I didn't say anything about referents or antecedents. My response was concerned with practical usage.
3. My mistake here. I meant phrasal, not clausal.
See, instead of making strange comments like \"I leave it to everyone decide whose answer was more helpful,\" I own up to mistakes when I make them. Nobody is perfect, and it should be a cooperative effort on all our parts to arrive at the best answers.
Since I sense that I am conspicuously omitted from acknowledgement lists on a pretty consistent basis so far, I think I shall just leave this roost to forum old-timers.
-
jamestancx997:
In that case, you need to tidy up your written expression.1. You are mistaken about the meaning of my sentences. I mean the same thing as you...
jamestancx997:
Depending on how flexible you wish the concept of 'practical usage' to be, the PSLE is not a test of practical usage.2. I didn't say anything about referents or antecedents. My response was concerned with practical usage.
jamestancx997:
Glad to hear it. You previously admitted to self-promotion, so I see hope for you.It should be a cooperative effort on all our parts to arrive at the best answers.
jamestancx997:
You are worried about popularity? If you wish to help others, do not be concerned with lack of acknowledgement.Since I sense that I am conspicuously omitted from acknowledgement lists on a pretty consistent basis so far, I think I shall just leave this roost to forum old-timers.
I acknowledge your effort.
Rgds
R -
-
I have some S&T questions, would appreciate some help.
1) I took my medicine. I went to bed.
After
Which answer is correct ?
(a) After I took my medicine, I went to bed.
(b) After I have taken my medicine, I went to bed.
After I had taken my medicine, I went to bed.
The teacher says, but why is (b) or (a) wrong ?
2) Grandmother still stays at Marine Parade. Grandmother stayed there from 1983.
_ since ___________________________
Are both the below acceptable :
(a) Grandmother has been staying at Marine Parade since 1983.
(b) Grandmother has stayed at Marine Parade since 1983.
3) Tom won the contract. He was confident and sincere.
Owing to _______________________________________
Are both the below acceptable :
(a) Owing to Tom’s confidence and sincerity, the contract was won.
(b) Owing to his confidence and sincerity, Tom won the contract.
4) Sherry does not return until she has bought all she needs for the party.
Not until __________________________________________
Is this correct?
Not until Sherry has bought all she needs for the party, she will not return.
5) Mr Wong was short. He could reach the shelf.
Despite ___________________________
Which is correct ?
(a) Despite Mr Wong’s shortness, he could reach the shelf.
(b) Despite Mr Wong’s short height, he could reach the shelf.
Many thanks!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login