Net rumour that Yaw Shin Leong having extra-maritial affair

[verykiasu2010]

Dawnie:

I am always enlighten to read threads in KSP, but some of the postings here is really an eyesore. I better :siam:

need some eye shade ? :rotflmao:

[Lshawn]

any photo?

[buds]

verykiasu2010:

concern2:

[quote=\"znzyzyzx\"]i find it strange that people keep saying that ltk must know what his subordinates are up to. Hello, even your own kids, you may not know what they are up to outside. If he wants to know, then he pronably need to employ PI.

:rotflmao: Good point, znzyzyzx.

\"...even in the best of systems, no one can guarantee that corruption or wrong-doing can entirely be eradicated and that there will never be cases of misconduct, as there will always be human failings, human weaknesses which we may discover later.\"

- DPM Teo said in Parliament on 13th Feb 2012.

even Hilary in the White House did not know what Clinton was doing with Lewensky ........ \"I have got nothing to do with that woman\" ..... women are real woe to man[/quote]Hard for Hilary to know since it was \"under\" table.
Vk2010.. mebbe he meant whoa! the entire time.

[raysusan]

[quote]Translated Text of the letter to Lianhe Zaobao dated 18 Feb 2012

To: The Editor of the Lianhe Zaobao Forum Page
I thank Mr He Jialiang for his Zaobao forum letter (“My interpretation of the matters regarding Yaw Shin Leong”, 18 Feb 2012), showing his concern for the Workers’ Party (WP). Mr He was of the opinion that the WP’s decision was a rash and hurried one.
Firstly, almost a month had passed between the first media allegations and the WP’s decision to expel Mr Yaw Shin Leong. Mr Yaw continued to remain silent on the matter, and refused to account to the WP Central Executive Council (CEC). The WP had no choice but to invoke clause 22(a) of the WP Constitution to expel him. In what way was this decision rash and hurried?
Secondly, although I have worked with Mr Yaw for many years, the members of the Party’s election committee and I had no knowledge of the allegations about him. As I said during the media conference, “The Workers’ Party has a system to select its candidates, and my relationship with Mr Yaw is basically a working relationship within the Party.” (16 Feb 2012, Zaobao page 4.) Although I know Mr Yaw’s background, have met his family, and attended the wedding ceremonies of his two marriages, I have neither the means nor the right to investigate his private matters and private life. I am a Member of Parliament, not a private investigator! Mr He said that I should take responsibility for the matters regarding Mr Yaw. May I know how he thinks I should take responsibility?
Thirdly, I agree that an election is a serious matter, and it “expends a large amount of money, manpower and resources”. If the WP has “abused the democratic system” by causing a by-election, as a result of expelling Mr Yaw due to his failure to account to the Party and loss of public trust, then consider the events of 1992, when the then-Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong voluntarily resigned and caused a by-election in Marine Parade GRC. May I ask Mr He how would he interpret the matter of a Prime Minister resigning from his Parliamentary seat after being elected in the 1991 General Elections to trigger a by-election?
Low Thia Khiang
Secretary-General, Workers’ Party
MP for Aljunied GRC
Note: It was later revealed in Shin Min Daily News report on 20 Feb 2012, that the writer He Jialiang is the former Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Mr Ho Kah Leong[/quote]http://wp.sg/2012/02/mr-low-thiang-kiangs-response-to-forum-letter-on-lianhe-zaobao-%E5%88%98%E7%A8%8B%E5%BC%BA%E7%AD%94%E8%A6%86%E6%97%A9%E6%8A%A5%E8%AF%BB%E8%80%85%E6%9D%A5%E4%BF%A1/

is this the guy?
http://www.parl.gov.sg/mp/ho-kah-leong
http://www.parl.gov.sg/sites/default/files/hokahleong.gif\">

[Strparent]

buds:

verykiasu2010:

[quote=\"znzyzyzx\"]i find it strange that people keep saying that ltk must know what his subordinates are up to. Hello, even your own kids, you may not know what they are up to outside. If he wants to know, then he pronably need to employ PI.

even Hilary in the White House did not know what Clinton was doing with Lewensky ........ \"I have got nothing to do with that woman\" ..... women are real woe to man

Hard for Hilary to know since it was \"under\" table. [/quote]Buds :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :evil:

Vote PAP:

Points taken, insider. .....
.......
I find it amusing it escaped the notice of your learned alter-ego...? Very telling....

:scared: :shock: :yikes: :scratchhead: :scratchhead:

do tell :oops:

[limlim]

HVR:

CSM and Sylvia Lim look promising but you have to really worry when someone wish and express their desire to see some pretty opposition faces in the parliament.

TPL TPL........ go go go...... :evil:

not opp also can do..

[3Boys]

concern2:

BTW, were you referring to me in the first place? LOL! sorry, I missed it! I thought you were on my side when you said the name was irritating

Not in particular. But I do find the innuendo and side conversations about posters to be tiresome, I am singularly unused to that form of engagement.

[schweppes]

buds:

verykiasu2010:

even Hilary in the White House did not know what Clinton was doing with Lewensky ........ \"I have got nothing to do with that woman\" ..... women are real woe to man

Hard for Hilary to know since it was \"under\" table.

Vk2010.. mebbe he meant whoa! the entire time.

buds... buds... buds... :rotflmao: :rotflmao:

even in a serious and heated topic such as this, trust u to see the lighter side of things

[concern2]

3Boys:

concern2:

BTW, were you referring to me in the first place? LOL! sorry, I missed it! I thought you were on my side when you said the name was irritating

Not in particular. But I do find the innuendo and side conversations about posters to be tiresome, I am singularly unused to that form of engagement.

Actually, it makes my hands shake every time I do it - but I was actually just shaking the warning bell (warning of a spark that might turn into a fire), not the ice-cream bell. Or perhaps I was using the ice-cream bell as the warning bell. Sorry guys, no more bells then. :censored:

[limlim]

Vote PAP:

I'm a firm believer that \" if it ain't broke, don't fix it \", period.

Not broke yet.. juz falling apart only....




gosh.. SMRT was so reliable.. before it was privatized.. few days ago.. was taking the MRT.. it was so crowded and then the door closed when pple are still moving in and the door \"kiap\" the person!.. then I was wondering.. this is Singapore?! Oh....... the \"new \" Singapore...... cannot expect too much.. Gone was the days when things Singapore was a pride..

Anyway.. I was a firm supporter of MIW before.. everything they do just seems so right (influenced by MSM?) until I joined the workforce.. then.. as I watched more and observed more.. I realised the truth..

\"Stop at 2\" was a brilliant plan.. or so I believed.. what the MSM said.. then now? citizenship and PR on lelong?.. then I realized.. it was nothing more than a lack of foresight.. not a mistake really.. just.. not a very brilliant move..

Times have changed.. like the govt always says.. so the same applies to politics.. Absolute power is not attractive to the electorate anymore.

Pple no longer \"blindly\" listen to the MSM anymore..

Anyway, as a matter of fact, new generation don't really want a change of ruling party.. most probably just wanted a stronger Opp presence.. so the talk about \"risk of change of govt\" etc.. are really almost non-existent..

A few Opp in parliament and pple worry abt change of Govt..? what a joke.. a bit like Orchard road \"ponded\" only and pple worry about SG sinking.....