All Schools are GOOD Schools
-
limlim:
I rather they ban tuition center first..Singfrench:
how about doing away with PSLE??? No more crazy t-scores...schools evaluate kids throughout the year without numbered scores like in the european/some international school systems.
SG is based on meritocracy.. If you remove PSLE, how are you going to set the admission requirement for Sec Sch?
For P1, there is no choice but to consider other factors bcoz there is no reason to test the kids if they never received any formal education. And already many feedback that the criteria is not fair.
If you set admission criteria for Sec sch to be other than PSLE results.. you're going to open another can of worms for MOE..
If no PSLE but other evaluation, how to ensure that it is fair and on equal standing between different schools?
I definitely would advocate banning tuition centers too...
but if (and when) all primary schools are good, all secondary schools will be good too. So then no one will care which school their children go to as long as they have attained the required skills-set to enter a secondary school. Teachers obviously have to be very competent and of course the MOE will have to ensure that teachers and schools are doing their jobs.
Perhaps it is human nature to want to know how our child if faring as compared to their cohort and that is why we have so much kiasu-ness. To me having a numbered grade does not tell me in which area my children are good or weak in.
In my kids' previous school system, the report card was several pages long consisting of a list of all the skills a child need to know to pass his level and each skill is graded into 4 categories (\"acquired\", \"to be reinforced\", \"in the process of being acquired\", \"not acquired\" sorry translation might be poor from french). Teachers worked very hard to ensure that the kids have the necessary skills to move on. Maybe i've come from a very different system to this SG system where exams are so segregating** and it irks me that i have no choice but to put my kids through this competition. Playdates and sleepovers are a thing of the past for my kids and I feel sorry for them that they cannot have the same level of friendship as they had before.
**Despite being very anti-segregation, i believe gifted kids, learning disabled kids should be given special attention during certain academic periods. -
Chenonceau:
Wow... this thread has moved!! Welcome back Singfrench! I missed you.
hi chenonceau, missed you too...
-
limlim:
:goodpost:
The poison is too deep liao.. \"I don't know what to say...........\"janet_lee88:
You mean ban tuition centre ? How will our kids pass exams if tuition centers/tuition is banned ? Schools are not teaching our kids sufficient to even pass exams. Not every parent is able to coach given the high standard/difficulty level now. I can still coach my p2 daughter in the meantime, but don't know for how long more.
Since when is passing exam the duty of the tuition centers..?? IT is the responsibility of the schools!
If there is no tuition centers and the passing rate is 5%.. The school must do something about it! Like adjusting the examination questions OR conduct remedial classes for the students.. Not throw them at tuition centers!
w/o tuition centers, the school will do something, must do something.. with tuition centers, the school may not see the problem or do anything about it.. and that, is the problem NOW.
yes, that is my point about education now being gradually integrated and accepted in the mindset of many parents, no offence intended. The issue here is due to all these bandings, and enrichment centres, parents are getting pressurised to go along that direction. The schools MAY then NOT see the need to improve themselves and their system to improve the educating of all the children.
This is not a personal matter, it is a national one, one that we citizens must get the MOE to address quickly. No longer should we accept the system and improvise... at least not all the way. In the end, those who are not able to catch up , or afford, will be left further and futher behind.
Have you not noticed that the delinquent teens in many of the 3rd tier, 4th tier secondary schools are rapidly increasing ? These teens are largely left out of the meritocracy system and as teens , they know it, and they react instinctively to be rebellious. My personal opinion of course, but I have seen my niece turned from a sweet smart girl to someone totally different from 12yrs old to 15 yo. And there are many more. We see the Darren Ngs, the Aaron Tans, etc, ... perhaps things would be different if they are given more opportunities, more attention, more help.
Focus should not be only on the top certain percentage of all cohorts. -
if they ban tuition centres, maybe a lot of mums will drop out of the workforce to personally coach their kids.
-
Strparent:
:goodpost:
The poison is too deep liao.. \"I don't know what to say...........\"limlim:
[quote=\"janet_lee88\"]
You mean ban tuition centre ? How will our kids pass exams if tuition centers/tuition is banned ? Schools are not teaching our kids sufficient to even pass exams. Not every parent is able to coach given the high standard/difficulty level now. I can still coach my p2 daughter in the meantime, but don't know for how long more.
Since when is passing exam the duty of the tuition centers..?? IT is the responsibility of the schools!
If there is no tuition centers and the passing rate is 5%.. The school must do something about it! Like adjusting the examination questions OR conduct remedial classes for the students.. Not throw them at tuition centers!
w/o tuition centers, the school will do something, must do something.. with tuition centers, the school may not see the problem or do anything about it.. and that, is the problem NOW.
yes, that is my point about education now being gradually integrated and accepted in the mindset of many parents, no offence intended. The issue here is due to all these bandings, and enrichment centres, parents are getting pressurised to go along that direction. The schools MAY then NOT see the need to improve themselves and their system to improve the educating of all the children.
This is not a personal matter, it is a national one, one that we citizens must get the MOE to address quickly. No longer should we accept the system and improvise... at least not all the way. In the end, those who are not able to catch up , or afford, will be left further and futher behind.
Have you not noticed that the delinquent teens in many of the 3rd tier, 4th tier secondary schools are rapidly increasing ? These teens are largely left out of the meritocracy system and as teens , they know it, and they react instinctively to be rebellious. My personal opinion of course, but I have seen my niece turned from a sweet smart girl to someone totally different from 12yrs old to 15 yo. And there are many more. We see the Darren Ngs, the Aaron Tans, etc, ... perhaps things would be different if they are given more opportunities, more attention, more help.
Focus should not be only on the top certain percentage of all cohorts.[/quote]where's the 'like' button?? -
What about banning better students from attending tuition, haha, get rid of the kiasu mentality in parents and students. Students must show poor school results ( say below 65) to be eligible to attend tuition. In that case, the good ones learn to be independent learners and the weaker ones have more help to improve on their weaker subjects. No more tuition centers accept good ones and boast abt their excellent results.
-
PiggyLalala:
What about banning better students from attending tuition, haha, get rid of the kiasu mentality in parents and students. Students must show poor school results ( say below 65) to be eligible to attend tuition. In that case, the good ones learn to be independent learners and the weaker ones have more help to improve on their weaker subjects. No more tuition centers accept good ones and boast abt their excellent results.
Parents being parents is concern and want the best for their child...
Adjust PARENTS mentality FIRST........be less anxious
There is many path to success .....
This is faster to save the situation.....
MOE sleeping :spank: .....by the time they wake up we lost a few good children to IMH,deinquent or
-
beware of what you guys are asking for ...... this ksp website may get banned, terminated, chief ks got jailed, forumers get interrogated and jailed for sharing ks tips ....... we are in for cultural revolution .....ooops, anyone spying me being ks ? :evil: :evil: :evil:
-
PiggyLalala:
What about banning better students from attending tuition, haha, get rid of the kiasu mentality in parents and students. Students must show poor school results ( say below 65) to be eligible to attend tuition. In that case, the good ones learn to be independent learners and the weaker ones have more help to improve on their weaker subjects. No more tuition centers accept good ones and boast abt their excellent results.
unlikely to happen, but I LIKED THE IDEA :celebrate:
in the past, tuition as for children who fall behind, who couldn't catch-up.
Now the re-branding is called enrichment, normally associated with eca like music, etc. Now it is learning ahead, and staying ahead, me, myself, self-focus, etc.
Please do not get sensitive, nothing wrong with parents wanting the best for their kids, and for sure those who can afford, has the right to do so. But the issue is NATIONAL education for all, or at least most and majority of, our children in Singapore.
imho, eg LL is becoming too brand conscious, they already doing intake tests to qualify, next time how ? Only top tier sch students allowed ? only household income above 10k allowed ? only GEP allowed ? what happened to the learning ? more like elitist, imho.
I have to hand it to their management though, they learnt well from our govt, and they are reaping good financial returns as well as brand bragging rights. maybe in future GEP education will be outsourced to them as well ? :scared: -
Strparent:
this is the result of the information and internet agePiggyLalala:
What about banning better students from attending tuition, haha, get rid of the kiasu mentality in parents and students. Students must show poor school results ( say below 65) to be eligible to attend tuition. In that case, the good ones learn to be independent learners and the weaker ones have more help to improve on their weaker subjects. No more tuition centers accept good ones and boast abt their excellent results.
unlikely to happen, but I LIKED THE IDEA :celebrate:
in the past, tuition as for children who fall behind, who couldn't catch-up.
Now the re-branding is called enrichment, normally associated with eca like music, etc. Now it is learning ahead, and staying ahead, me, myself, self-focus, etc.
Please do not get sensitive, nothing wrong with parents wanting the best for their kids, and for sure those who can afford, has the right to do so. But the issue is NATIONAL education for all, or at least most and majority of, our children in Singapore.
eg. Learning Lab is becoming too brand conscious, they already doing intake tests to qualify, next time how ? Only top tier sch students allowed ? only household income above 10k allowed ? only GEP allowed ? what happened to the learning ? more like elitist, imho.
I have to hand it to their management though, they learnt well from our govt, and they are reaping good financial returns as well as brand bragging rights. maybe in future GEP education will be outsourced to them as well ? :scared:
it is the same phenomena every major city in the world
you are left behind if you are not forging ahead
however, normal distribution curve still prevails; so, fret not
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login