Q&A - PSLE Science

[Clairifina]

Please help with this question.


Wheat plant–>Grasshopper–>Sparrow–>Python

A lot of chemical was sprayed on the wheat plants to get rid of weeds at a farm. In the long run, the chemical was found to be the greatest in the python. Explain how this has happened.

[atutor2001]

Clairifina:

Please help with this question.


Wheat plant-->Grasshopper-->Sparrow-->Python

A lot of chemical was sprayed on the wheat plants to get rid of weeds at a farm. In the long run, the chemical was found to be the greatest in the python. Explain how this has happened.

When the grasshopper eat the wheat plant sprayed with chemical, the chemical is passed to the grasshopper. The chemical remains and accumulate in the body of the grasshopper which is the total amount of chemical found on all the leaves that it had eaten.

When the sparrow eats the grasshoppers, the chemical that is accumulated in the grasshoppers is passed to the sparrow. Again, the chemical remains and accumulate in the the body of the sparrow which is the total amount of chemical found in all the grasshoppers that it had eaten.

As a result, the python will have the greatest amount of chemical which is the total amount of chemical found in all the sparrows that it had eaten .

My answer : The chemical on the leaves is passed to the grasshopper when it eats the leaves. Its body system is unable to remove the chemical and the chemical remains and accumulated in its body. The same process occurs down the food chain. As a results the python will have the most chemical because it consumes an accumulation of all the chemical taken in by all the organisms before it in the food chain.

[Clairifina]

Thank you so much!

[kitty2]

Series or parallel circuit is brighter?Circuit with series battery is bright or with parallel battery?Circuit with series bulb is brighter or with parallel bulb?


Please help as my nephew is very confused with the above.

Thanks

[Alarmchain]

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7134/7722111444_208d639f6f_z.jpg\">


Hope someone can help with this.

Attached was a past PSLE question which my daughter did as part of her revision.

For the 2nd reason in part (b) of the attached, I explained to my daughter that she did not elaborate how more friction caused the snake to move over a shorter distance. I suggested to her that she should have added the following: \"As friction creates heat, the snake will gain more heat compared to the lizard. As such, the lizard can move over a longer distance than the snake.\"

I also suggested to her that since part (a) of the question was about heat gain / loss and surface area, she should use that as a clue to answer part (b).

HOWEVER, the answer given by her teacher was:
\" For the lizard, at each time, only 2 of its feet touches the ground but for the snake, the whole body is in contact with the hot sand.\"

Like my daughter, I am confused! How does having only 2 feet help the lizard move a longer distance? If it is about having less surface area in contact, wouldn't that be a repetition of reason 1? Would anyone happen to know how? She is unable to understand her teacher's reasoning, despite asking.

More importantly, would someone let me know if the answer from my daughter and my suggested additions is also an acceptable answer to this question? Or how your child's teacher answered this part of the question.

Thanking you in advance.

[charsen]

Alarmchain:

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7134/7722111444_208d639f6f_z.jpg\">


Hope someone can help with this.

Attached was a past PSLE question which my daughter did as part of her revision.

For the 2nd reason in part (b) of the attached, I explained to my daughter that she did not elaborate how more friction caused the snake to move over a shorter distance. I suggested to her that she should have added the following: \"As friction creates heat, the snake will gain more heat compared to the lizard. As such, the lizard can move over a longer distance than the snake.\"

I also suggested to her that since part (a) of the question was about heat gain / loss and surface area, she should use that as a clue to answer part (b).

HOWEVER, the answer given by her teacher was:
\" For the lizard, at each time, only 2 of its feet touches the ground but for the snake, the whole body is in contact with the hot sand.\"

Like my daughter, I am confused! How does having only 2 feet help the lizard move a longer distance? If it is about having less surface area in contact, wouldn't that be a repetition of reason 1? Would anyone happen to know how? She is unable to understand her teacher's reasoning, despite asking.

More importantly, would someone let me know if the answer from my daughter and my suggested additions is also an acceptable answer to this question? Or how your child's teacher answered this part of the question.

Thanking you in advance.

Hi
Your answer is definetely an acceptable answer.I wrote a similar answer to your acceptable answerand my teacher accepted it.The only thing that your daughter did not do was she did not explain fully the question.The teacher's answer is totally wrong as you have to compare the friction between the snake body and the sand to the lizard.
My answer is this:The friction between the lizard 's legs to the hot sand is smaller than the friction between the snake and the hot sand,causing the lizard to move a longer distance.
cheers

[charsen]

kitty2:

Series or parallel circuit is brighter?Circuit with series battery is bright or with parallel battery?Circuit with series bulb is brighter or with parallel bulb?


Please help as my nephew is very confused with the above.

Thanks

It depends on the arrangement of batteries or the arrangement of bulbs of the circuit.I can tell what the brightness of the bulb is when you say the arrangement of batteries is in series or parallel or the arrangement of bulbs is in series or parallel.
Cheers

[atutor2001]

Alarmchain:

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7134/7722111444_208d639f6f_z.jpg\">

The question :
\"...why this lizard can move over a longer distance on hot sand compared to the snake....\"

Analysis :
There is no time factor involved in the question i.e. it has nothing to do with speed. So friction is unlikely to be a consideration.

The focus is on the hot sand i.e. the distance moved by each animal is limited because of the heat from the sand.

At any one time, different pairs of legs of the lizard are in contact with the hot sand while the same part of the body of the snake is continuously in contact with the sand. When the pair of legs of the lizard is lifted up, it can lose heat to the surrounding air.


My answer :
At any one time, only 2 feet of the lizard is in contact with the hot sand. It also alternates/switches between the 2 pairs of feet to be in contact. As such, given the same duration, each pair of feet of the lizard will only spend half the time in contact with the hot sand while the body of the snake will be in contact with the hot sand for the whole duration. The feet of the lizard can also lose heat when it is not in contact with the sand. Therefore, the total amount of heat gained by the lizard is much lesser than the snake and it can move a longer distance over the hot sand compared to the snake.

[Alarmchain]

Thank you so much to both Charsen and atutor, appreciate your inputs!


To atutor:
I finally understand the reasoning of the teacher, thank you!

However, as friction generates heat, which is how my daughter and I had explained in the answer in my original post, wouldn’t that be similar to your last sentence of "Therefore, the total amount of heat gained by the lizard is much lesser than the snake and it can move a longer distance over the hot sand compared to the snake.", since the snake would have gained more heat generated by friction as well?

If we had explained it as friction being an opposing force and therefore it results in a shorter distance travelled, I will then agree that it may not have fully answered the context of this question.

Appreciate your thoughts on this.

Thanks!

[atutor2001]

Alarmchain:

Thank you so much to both Charsen and atutor, appreciate your inputs!


To atutor:
I finally understand the reasoning of the teacher, thank you!

However, as friction generates heat, which is how my daughter and I had explained in the answer in my original post, wouldn't that be similar to your last sentence of \"Therefore, the total amount of heat gained by the lizard is much lesser than the snake and it can move a longer distance over the hot sand compared to the snake.\", since the snake would have gained more heat generated by friction as well?


My thought :
I have simplified the last sentence just for easier understanding at Pr level. The reason for the snake or the lizard to stop moving and seek for shade from the sun is when the heat gained at the part of the body in contact with the hot sand is so high that they will get burnt.

The heat gained through friction is negligible compared to that by conduction from the hot sand. Therefore, it is a minor factor and will not be accepted as an answer.

If we had explained it as friction being an opposing force and therefore it results in a shorter distance travelled, I will then agree that it may not have fully answered the context of this question.

Appreciate your thoughts on this.

Thanks!