MOE to stop publishing names of top students?
-
Freesia:
You say it as though academic excellence and humanity, compassion, kindness, humility etc are mutually exclusive. That is insulting to all who achieved high academic honour in the past.Do our children strive to do well just to be the top and be honoured?
What is the purpose of education? What about other character values?
I have seen top students in my DD's school who does not allow the weaker students to join their group. Top student who does not want to share their secret to success for fear that someone will overtake them.
As it is for all leadership position in school; academic takes precedence over character. To these junior top scorer, academic is the ultimate power to success and they think they are a motch on top of others just because they do well academically. I cannot imagine their arrogance in the event they are being honoured as a top scorer.
Why should we held a young child in such high honour based on one's academic excellence? Education is more than academic excellence.
PSLE is only part of the game and not the end of the race. Who would remember the face of the top scorer in time to come? As such, if there is no value add why have it in the 1st place?
Should we not honour and celeberate humanity, compassion, kindness, humility etc ?
If those top students exhibit the kind of behaviour and tendency you described, the fault lies squarely with their parents and teachers. Feel free to name and shame the school. -
I am only referring to one of the post that the top scorer deserve to be recognized and honour for their hardwork.
One strive towards academic excellence for one’s own goal and purpose, no?
To be a doctor or lawyer to help people, to be a teacher to make a difference to someone’s life. How does honouring these top scorer help to emphaisze and meet the social objectives?
Why the need for recognition and honour for academic excellence? Am sure many past high PSLE achiever’s objective to do well to meet their own goals and purpose and did not expect to be honoured?
With recognition and honouring the top student; many will become the product of the society like what Dr Richard Teo said in his eulogy. I am positive that his parents did not make him what he is but savouring in recognition delivering what society deem succeesful helps to make him temporarily forget humanity.
Academic prowess is nothing to be ashamed of but academic prowess is nothing to be proud of too. At the end of the chess game, be it the King, Queen, Knight or Pawn; it goes into the same box. -
Freesia:
I agree. We should celebrate humanity, compassion, kindness, etc. Except that there are no exams to take for these and it is difficult to say who is more compassionate than others. These are socio-cultural qualities, highly desirable, but difficult to define and measure. It would also be awkward to give awards for these qualities, because they are usually committed out of the kindness of one's soul and not for some material recognition. I, for one, would feel weird receiving a Samaritan of the Year award from MOE.... Why should we held a young child in such high honour based on one's academic excellence? Education is more than academic excellence.
PSLE is only part of the game and not the end of the race. Who would remember the face of the top scorer in time to come? As such, if there is no value add why have it in the 1st place?
Should we not honour and celeberate humanity, compassion, kindness, humility etc ?
...
But I would love to read more stories about the human spirit happening in good old Singapore, how people selflessly helped others in times of difficulty. Because these are the stories that give me hope and build faith in my fellow citizens.
Academic excellence, on the other hand, is measurable by virtue of the common examination. It's a technical excellence, a \"know-how\". While it is perfectly good for MOE to say that we should re-balance the emphasis on technical excellence with socio-cultural excellence, it may not be right to say that we should stop celebrating technical excellence just because we have no way of measuring and celebrating socio-cultural excellence.
The fact remains that technical excellence is still the primary means of determining the paths that our children will take. That is the basis of meritocracy, upon which our society is built. -
Was watching a jap cartoon. Suddenly I thought so strange of us adults to feel pity for the top scorers, their name not published this year. But what if the top scorers don't care :rotflmao: of course not knowing that they are the national top scorers, assuming no one investigate and then with absolute certainty told them that they are, they might not feel it's unfair to them that now MOE don't announce their name.
Heehee -
Freesia:
... Academic prowess is nothing to be ashamed of but academic prowess is nothing to be proud of too. At the end of the chess game, be it the King, Queen, Knight or Pawn; it goes into the same box.
Why not? I would be lying if I say that I won't be proud of my son if he tops his class. I would be equally proud of my son if he tells me he shared his lunch with a less well-to-do classmate during recess time. -
SAHM_TAN:
I don't think the issue is whether it is fair or not fair for top scorers' names to be published. I am more concerned with the innuendo that MOE feels that publishing names of top scorers actually creates an \"over-emphasis on academic results\". If that is the case, then we should stop going for International academic competitions, Math Olympiads, etc because they promote unhealthy celebration of academic prowess amongst students.Was watching a jap cartoon. Suddenly I thought so strange of us adults to feel pity for the top scorers, their name not published this year. But what if the top scorers don't care :rotflmao: of course not knowing that they are the national top scorers, assuming no one investigate and then with absolute certainty told them that they are, they might not feel it's unfair to them that now MOE don't announce their name.
Heehee -
But there is no other prize or honour apart from being named. It does not come with a cash prize. It does not come with a scholarship. It does not come with a job offer. You don’t even get a medal. How does being named amonst the top scorers in itself lead to the child "temporarily forgetting humanity"?
By not recognizing those who top the batch, we are impliedly sending our children the message that once they are capable of hitting a certain score (ie. enough to get into their ‘dream’ school), there is no reason to work harder. In other words, merely being ‘excellent’ is good enough, there is no reason to work harder because what you can achieve beyond that does not meet ‘social objective’ or has ‘no value add’.
To me, that sounds even more mercenary and materialistic. -
Talk about knee-jerk reactions. Just because the noise about PSLE being stressful is getting louder, they are now going into overdrive to avoid all possible contribution to that stress.
Whatever the press prints, people will read and thereafter, who can remember who was top scorer from which school in what year. Spend more time beefing up the syllabus and getting the teachers up to par. All these thing about reporting about top student and whatever are inconsequential. -
Is there someone tracking the development of all our psle top scores how they are doing in schools, boy-girl relationship, marriage, work etc? I do not see the reason why not releasing names to celebrate the joy of the kid achievement.
-
MOE is still celebrating and encouraging academic excellence; it is done more subtly thru scholarship and other grants and maybe through the school’s own prize giving. I know ACS does have ceremony to honour their top scorer.
Just that the recognition does not come publicly.
PSLE score does not even need to be included in your resume, no?
If A level is cert is required for resume and yet the A level top scorer is not publicised; So why the need to honour PSLE top scorer ?
As such, in my opinion; there is not so much of a difference whether or not PSLE top scorer is publicised.
Technical excellence is not the determining paths our child will take as many do not end up pursuing a career related to their field of study. How many bankers are business grads? How many chemistry graduates actually went on to become a chemist?
Many at the top management may not excel academically when young. They are only those with average grades. If so, why the need to glorify the top scorer?
Even if you want to compete for your country be it academic or sports; it is because of your passion not because you expect to be recognized and honour.
If one is humble and rich in soul, one does not need recognition and honour and your country to rejoice and celebrate your achievements,
just like you do charity out of your own goodwill; you do not need the recognition.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login