Are you ready for 7 million people on tiny Singapore?

[Harlequin]

limlim:

Only the rich pple support a large population bcoz they benefit most from it while peasants suffers.

Yap! Shall we turn the nation into peasants?

[Harlequin]

JannettLee:

Harlequin:

現在は、滅私奉公ではなく、滅公奉私の時代だと言われています。

これに明確にしてください、それは人々が滅私奉公を要求し、またそれが人々が崇拝しているパブリック点滅の時代ではない、多くのではありません。それが今では彼らの経験だ。

I think your electronic translator might have got you misunderstood the meaning....

What I actually wrote was:-

In the old days people valued selflessness. But this generation seems to make a virtue out of selfishness.

[wonderm]

limlim:

Only the rich pple support a large population bcoz they benefit most from it while peasants suffers.

Since there are more peasants than rich people and PAP needs votes to stay in power. Why are they doing this? Are they crazy? :?

[Harlequin]

wonderm:

limlim:

Only the rich pple support a large population bcoz they benefit most from it while peasants suffers.

Since there are more peasants than rich people and PAP needs votes to stay in power. Why are they doing this? Are they crazy? :?

Even crazier to try to make our children study like superman-to-be, enhance our flat value etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etceteras.... please just leave us as peasants, we are happy and contented with dirt roads... And we will vote for you PAP.

[pirate]

mum_sugoku:

The whole model seems to bank on the presumption that foreigners will always flock to Singapore as and when our govt wants them to..


What if, in 10-20 years' time, there are other far more attractive cities for them to emigrate to? Would they still want to come here?

And after getting all ready for that supposed \"worst case scenario\" of 6.9m, immigrant doesn't flock here--as they've anticipated, then how? What are we gonna do with the presumed \"Singaporean PMET\" core then?

If they can lack forsight few years ago, there's no reason why the same batch of policy-makers wouldn't lack forsight yet again, is there?

So much for \"preparing for the worst\".

Then Singaporeans don't have to worry about overcrowding lor. There will be lots of space and a laid back life. Isn't that what a lot of people are asking for? :evil:

[limlim]

Harlequin:

limlim:

Only the rich pple support a large population bcoz they benefit most from it while peasants suffers.

Yap! Shall we turn the nation into peasants?

What has your question got to do with my comment?

[limlim]

wonderm:

limlim:

Only the rich pple support a large population bcoz they benefit most from it while peasants suffers.

Since there are more peasants than rich people and PAP needs votes to stay in power. Why are they doing this? Are they crazy? :?

I am not interested to speculate whoever's intention.

But, say, IF I am a selfish person. If I were currently in control of a company and I foresee that my control may not be sustainable in the long run, I would implement policies in my best interests regardless of the other individual's protest in preparation of the inevitable. Till then, I build up my golden nest :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: When it is time to handover, I gladly give up the control and enjoy my retirement in maybe Sentosa clove and my offsprings are well taken care of.. :evil: Leave the mess to those taking over..

http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=8321
[quote]
When the bubble eventually bursts and the economy sours, the scheme spirals downward with higher unemployment, depressed wages, falling incomes, more people sinking into debt, more homeless families — and more men, women and children on public assistance.

That is the stage when the advocates of Ponzi demography — notably enterprises in construction, manufacturing, finance, agriculture and food processing — consolidate their excess profits and gains. That leaves the general public to pick up the tab for the mounting costs from increased population growth (e.g., education, health, housing and basic public services).
[/quote]

[pirate]

I'm still waiting for people to say what they want leh. :scratchhead:


Shall we have 0.00% population growth between now and 2030? :evil:

[Harlequin]

limlim:

wonderm:

[quote=\"limlim\"]Only the rich pple support a large population bcoz they benefit most from it while peasants suffers.

Since there are more peasants than rich people and PAP needs votes to stay in power. Why are they doing this? Are they crazy? :?

I am not interested to speculate whoever's intention.

But, say, IF I am a selfish person. If I were currently in control of a company and I foresee that my control may not be sustainable in the long run, I would implement policies in my best interests regardless of the other individual's protest in preparation of the inevitable. Till then, I build up my golden nest :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: When it is time to handover, I gladly give up the control and enjoy my retirement in maybe Sentosa clove and my offsprings are well taken care of.. :evil: Leave the mess to those taking over..

http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=8321
[quote]
When the bubble eventually bursts and the economy sours, the scheme spirals downward with higher unemployment, depressed wages, falling incomes, more people sinking into debt, more homeless families — and more men, women and children on public assistance.

That is the stage when the advocates of Ponzi demography — notably enterprises in construction, manufacturing, finance, agriculture and food processing — consolidate their excess profits and gains. That leaves the general public to pick up the tab for the mounting costs from increased population growth (e.g., education, health, housing and basic public services).
[/quote][/quote]Is that the opposition party/ies that you would vote for? To let the old guns run away with their loots?

Then you should standby another group of opposition, to ensure your voted oppo wu chor kang :evil: just like now.

[Harlequin]

limlim:

Harlequin:

[quote=\"limlim\"]Only the rich pple support a large population bcoz they benefit most from it while peasants suffers.

Yap! Shall we turn the nation into peasants?

What has your question got to do with my comment?[/quote]Just seeking your opinion, since you have concluded that the large population is beneficial only to the rich.... cos I am as lost as you! :evil: