MPM Maths - Discussion

[catsu91]

Jelic : 10-session per term @ $380, only 1 hr 15 min per session per week

(approx. $38/session)

MPM : 12-session per tern @ $440, 2 hr per week
(approx. $36.70/session)

Obviously, based on the the amount of time versus the price, any biz. person would strongly recommend J. and not M.

[Giggler1]

Hi,


Any of you have feedback for the Jurong West and Pioneer branch?

How are the teachers at these 2 branches?

Thank you in advance.

[octoberbaby]

catsu91:

Jelic : 10-session per term @ $380, only 1 hr 15 min per session per week

(approx. $38/session)

MPM : 12-session per tern @ $440, 2 hr per week
(approx. $36.70/session)

Obviously, based on the the amount of time versus the price, any biz. person would strongly recommend J. and not M.

Not necessary 2 hrs. I saw some kids perhaps intelligent and discipline type, within one hr can even do 1 complete book and half complete. 2 hrs is just guidelines, depend on each centre.
Fee $440 is also depend on each centre. Those operated in CC or RC will charge on monthly basis as required by PA auditor.

[octoberbaby]

catsu91:

After I knew of the mummy's encounterment, I fear to approach to those centres with Jelic and MPMmath programmes so as to avoid being push to the non-preferred programme.

How old is the kid? 4 years old still can do jelic. 5 years old can do MPM liao. Did that centre actually explain the diff between jelic and MPM or not.

[totoro]

Any feedback on mpm at AMK ?

[catsu91]

Her daughter is 6 years old, K2 this year. Understand from her it’s the Tampines branch. At CPF building.

[catsu91]

I tried google from the mpmmath website but can’t get information regarding which branch with and without Jelic. Anyone know to share, please…? Thank you.

[catsu91]

Can’t from Year 2012 SA2 Results。

[catsu91]

Suggest to_tag_the centre’s_branch_next_to_the Results—and of_Good_Performance award. This can help parents to make decision in choosing a centre for their child.

[catsu91]

Only Year 2011 results is posted on the website.

Maybe it’s also good to publish Year 2010 results in the website.