Logo
    • Education
      • Pre-School
      • Primary Schools Directory
      • Primary Schools Articles
      • P1 Registration
      • DSA
      • PSLE
      • Secondary
      • Tertiary
      • Special Needs
    • Lifestyle
      • Well-being
    • Activities
      • Events
    • Enrichment & Services
      • Find A Service Provider
      • Enrichment Articles
      • Enrichment Services
      • Tuition Centre/Private Tutor
      • Infant Care/ Childcare / Student Care Centre
      • Kindergarten/Preschool
      • Private Institutions and International Schools
      • Special Needs
      • Indoor & Outdoor Playgrounds
      • Paediatrics
      • Neonatal Care
    • Forum
    • ASKQ
    • Register
    • Login

    Population woes

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Recess Time
    539 Posts 34 Posters 105.6k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • 3 Offline
      3Boys
      last edited by

      mum_sugoku:
      3Boys:

      [quote=\"WeiHan\"]If I may, I'll say that sustaining economic growth by increasing population is another form of kicking the can down the road. Just like how the present quantitative easings are kicking the can down the road for US (and European Union joining the party soon) financial problems. The only difference is that altering population density artificially creates a more permanent negative impact that may not be able to reverse at all.


      There is scale, and there is scale. What is the optimal size for a country? Is it 2 people? 2000? 2 million?

      Up to a point, size doesn't matter. No country can grow its population infinitely, and you will see that I have not argued that population be the end all and be all of economic growth, but rather, that we ought to be at a certain scale.

      The more pertinent point is the availability of talent (foreign, if you will) to drive growth.

      Haha. If we have not enough \"talents\" at 3 millions; we have not enough \"talents\" at 4 millions, and we still have not enough \"talents\" at 5 millions, what's the likelihood that we would have enough \"talents\" at 6.. or 6.5 millions?

      (When asked about the \"ideal\" population size, too bad that our PM had not said what you have said.. Instead, he said,\"We're gradually increasing our land area, and if we rebuild our older towns, then we can accommodate more people,\", \"Today our population is over five million. In the future, six million or so should not be a problem. Beyond that, we'll have to think more carefully\"..)[/quote]He has said exactly what I said. We can increase the population to the point that we have some scale. When a city like Shanghai is 20 million, being a city of 3 million is a disadvantage. Being a city of 6 million is still a disadvantage, but less so. He says beyond 6.5 million we will have to think more carefully, which means we will need to grow much more slowly if at all.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W Offline
        WeiHan
        last edited by

        3Boys:


        He has said exactly what I said. We can increase the population to the point that we have some scale. When a city like Shanghai is 20 million, being a city of 3 million is a disadvantage. Being a city of 6 million is still a disadvantage, but less so. He says beyond 6.5 million we will have to think more carefully, which means we will need to grow much more slowly if at all.
        Aren't we trying to compete on a resource that we naturally has a disadvantage? If increasing population and scale is an advantage, then we are doomed, Taipei, Shanghai, Seoul etc...can all increase scale much more easily than Singapore since their city size can expand easily within a hinterland but we can't.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          mum_sugoku
          last edited by

          3Boys:
          mum_sugoku:


          Haha. If we have not enough \"talents\" at 3 millions; we have not enough \"talents\" at 4 millions, and we still have not enough \"talents\" at 5 millions, what's the likelihood that we would have enough \"talents\" at 6.. or 6.5 millions?

          (When asked about the \"ideal\" population size, too bad that our PM had not said what you have said.. Instead, he said,\"We're gradually increasing our land area, and if we rebuild our older towns, then we can accommodate more people,\", \"Today our population is over five million. In the future, six million or so should not be a problem. Beyond that, we'll have to think more carefully\"..)

          He has said exactly what I said. We can increase the population to the point that we have some scale. When a city like Shanghai is 20 million, being a city of 3 million is a disadvantage. Being a city of 6 million is still a disadvantage, but less so. He says beyond 6.5 million we will have to think more carefully, which means we will need to grow much more slowly if at all.

          \"scale\" = max. capacity????! (Why, do you think, that PM said \"we have to think carefully beyond 6.5million\"?)

          Anyway I share WeiHan's sentiment 😄 .

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • 3 Offline
            3Boys
            last edited by

            WeiHan:
            3Boys:



            He has said exactly what I said. We can increase the population to the point that we have some scale. When a city like Shanghai is 20 million, being a city of 3 million is a disadvantage. Being a city of 6 million is still a disadvantage, but less so. He says beyond 6.5 million we will have to think more carefully, which means we will need to grow much more slowly if at all.

            Aren't we trying to compete on a resource that we naturally has a disadvantage? If increasing population and scale is an advantage, then we are doomed, Taipei, Shanghai, Seoul etc...can all increase scale much more easily than Singapore since their city size can expand easily within a hinterland but we can't.

            Chan Chun Sing, and others before him, have already said that not having a hinterland is a BIG disadvantage.

            So who's to say we are not doomed? But I'm not giving up without a fight 😂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 3 Offline
              3Boys
              last edited by

              mum_sugoku:

              Anyway I share WeiHan's sentiment 😄 .
              Which is?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                pirate
                last edited by

                WeiHan:
                Aren't we trying to compete on a resource that we naturally has a disadvantage? If increasing population and scale is an advantage, then we are doomed, Taipei, Shanghai, Seoul etc...can all increase scale much more easily than Singapore since their city size can expand easily within a hinterland but we can't.

                Finally you understand the cards we have been dealt with. There is no resource we naturally have an advantage. What are we going to do about it?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  mum_sugoku
                  last edited by

                  3Boys:
                  mum_sugoku:


                  Anyway I share WeiHan's sentiment 😄 .

                  Which is?

                  This..
                  WeiHan:
                  Aren't we trying to compete on a resource that we naturally has a disadvantage? If increasing population and scale is an advantage, then we are doomed, Taipei, Shanghai, Seoul etc...can all increase scale much more easily than Singapore since their city size can expand easily within a hinterland but we can't.
                  ..and this
                  WeiHan:
                  If I may, I'll say that sustaining economic growth by increasing population is another form of kicking the can down the road. Just like how the present quantitative easings are kicking the can down the road for US (and European Union joining the party soon) financial problems. The only difference is that altering population density artificially creates a more permanent negative impact that may not be able to reverse at all.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    mum_sugoku
                    last edited by

                    pirate:
                    WeiHan:

                    Aren't we trying to compete on a resource that we naturally has a disadvantage? If increasing population and scale is an advantage, then we are doomed, Taipei, Shanghai, Seoul etc...can all increase scale much more easily than Singapore since their city size can expand easily within a hinterland but we can't.


                    Finally you understand the cards we have been dealt with. There is no resource we naturally have an advantage. What are we going to do about it?

                    In other words, they have no solution.. except to keep reacting (yielding) to the situation..

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V Offline
                      verykiasumummy
                      last edited by

                      it is just a vicious cycle… ppl are getting mad with the garment inviting FT and NC, so they oppose them, while on the other hand the garment feels they are losing votes and keep inviting more FT and NC to vote them… so the cycle just continues…


                      if we could, do anything to ease the situation, is to vote our garment by outstanding majority votes so that they could drop or reduce the number of NC coming to sg…

                      if that is ever possible…

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • FunzF Offline
                        Funz
                        last edited by

                        verykiasumummy:
                        it is just a vicious cycle... ppl are getting mad with the garment inviting FT and NC, so they oppose them, while on the other hand the garment feels they are losing votes and keep inviting more FT and NC to vote them... so the cycle just continues...


                        if we could, do anything to ease the situation, is to vote our garment by outstanding majority votes so that they could drop or reduce the number of NC coming to sg...

                        if that is ever possible...
                        FT and NCs have no voting rights. Even PRs cannot vote. And that is definitely not the reason why the govt is importing more foreign labour, be they FW or FT.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 21
                        • 22
                        • 23
                        • 24
                        • 25
                        • 53
                        • 54
                        • 23 / 54
                        • First post
                          Last post



                        Online Users

                        Recent Topics
                        New to the KiasuParents forum? Tips and Tricks!
                        How do you maintain your relationship with your spouse?
                        Budgeting for tougher times ahead. What's yours?
                        SkillsFuture + anything related to upskilling/learning something new!
                        My girl keeps locking her door. And I don't like it
                        How much do you spend on the kids' tuition/enrichments?
                        DSA 2026
                        PSLE Discussions and Strategies

                        Statistics

                        2

                        Online

                        210.5k

                        Users

                        34.1k

                        Topics

                        1.8m

                        Posts
                          About Us Contact Us forum Terms of Service Privacy Policy