phankao:MandyMummy:Hi phankao, you got translator? Does it work for the article?
Urgh, I thot to use Google translator but need to copy it in. Doesn't seem to translate KSparents webpage
Hi Phankao,
Taken directly off Google Translator, so pardon the grammatical errors.
Education Ministry to revise regulations to be more open and transparent (2011-12-31)
Peng Yuquan
PSLE distribute the dust settles, but this year it appeared to many parents and students are injured administrative error, the Ministry of Education to be open to the public an explanation.
Simply put, in the past in direct admission scheme (DSA) are under the early admission to the secondary students, is by virtue of results in the HKCEE after further the ideal school to another school made an application (appeal), the school itself can also taking appropriate circumstances and conditions. But this year the Ministry of Education has not announced to the public in advance, in that many parents and children change schools can also be made to apply in the case, stringent requirements of high school at the last moment to stop this practice, so many efforts to achieve good results and look forward to making the application children and parents stunned admiration error was deeply confused and opaque decision-making process at the expense, aroused strong criticism on the network.
Sign DSA in consent before the child's primary school had asked and was told in the examinations, the virtue of achievements of the school transfer application before signing DSA admission consent. At the same time, many parents and students understand and can apply to change schools are, and we signed the documents as well as primary in May this year to provide students with the file on DSA, DSA were not acceptable after the Ordinance shall not be marked applying for transfer. However, the Ministry of Education actually ignore all secondary schools in previous years, after examination of the \"grab a top student,\" the fact that the presence of DSA in the parents signed a consent form in late October after the ban was hastily sent to all secondary school transfer e-mail.
Past cases show, DSA change schools after the application for admission and not expressly prohibited, or even the Ministry of Education is permitted. Part of the school year, parents are told not to accept the application for transfer was very surprised, turned to ask the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Education, yet the responsibility to the school, said the decision by the schools themselves, the Ministry of Education can not interfere, but private schools are not allowed to accept demands application. If you start to not accept, why some top schools also allow parents to apply and be charged 20 yuan fee? Is it blatant cheating? However, some schools, some do not accept just the extreme confusion!
In clarifying the context, we find that the Ministry of Education is the key decision-making process of hasty and irresponsible for parents and children. This relationship between the large interests of the child's future and a major shift, reasonable and mature decision-making process should be the first to obtain the consensus of all schools (in the past school independently, apparently there is no consensus on whether or not to accept applications for the Ministry of Education is not strictly prohibited), and through the mass media and schools clearly communicated to all parents and students, and then formally implemented in the next year, more appropriate.
But sad to find that such a major change in the decision, the Ministry of Education is a private email to the end of October after the school principal that counts, once implemented, parents and students all kept in the dark, the current performance of the students do well full of hope Transfer application has been made, even by an executive order issued by a piece of paper hastily frustrated. Death of a student's future education policy, even so \"the secret is not leaked,\" it was incredible.
Must be emphasized that our children attend the schools do not end prejudice. Ministry of Education to fight for an account to the public, so that students from non-transparent decision-making after the pain. An experienced, emphasizing meritocracy Ministry of Education, why would commit such a rough decision-making errors? School students and parents are confused and even in the case, change a practice for years, ignoring the interests of graduates and parents rushing their hard work? Why? Now a done deal, graduates interests to be sacrificed, and how to restore? Wrong decision-making process leading to damage the public interest, is a major problem, the Government should in-depth investigation, be held accountable.
