phtthp:

mommyNg:

Just the physical building being delayed....

high-rise JC delayed by new LTA requirement

http://news.asiaone.com/news/education/ ... equirement

Yes but this is a breach of commitment by MOE. I understand because our children stay in schools v long hours, many parents take distance as a factor and this is also what moe has always suggested.

These parents and kids had a choice but chose it because of both location and programme. Their frustrations are understandable. We should put ourselves in their shores. Talk is easy but waking up an hour earlier is no joke. And staying late in j c 2 to study is common especially if one does not have a conducive home environment. Don't think we want that for our own children

I empathise with affected parents. I understand even the earlier 2 batches, parents somewhat know that the new jc will be in the vicinity of St Nicks and CHS as some of the parents pointed out.

It appears to be a breach of promise by MOE. I understand this is not the first delay. Also now the holding site is switched. Double whammy!

Some suggestions are: a)provide a nearby alternative site to build b) allow Dsa to other j c. I think switching to o levels is not a good option given that these kids worked hard for their p s l e and qualified for ip, with some even with scores to enter to raffles or nanyang or other academically top schools