bbbay\" post_id=\"2125996\" time=\"1703941425\" user_id=\"175278:Hi, since one parent mentioned that NJC is ranked 2nd last amongst IP JCs, hence I am trying to explain where are the possible disparities. Intake is quite good for PSLE (almost the same as COP for HCI for example) but apparently A level output is not as good. It could possibly be due to the JAE intake which is the majority and the COP of NJC for JAE is definitely worse off than HCI for example. Hence, what I am trying to say is that we can't really say that NJC is not value adding to the IP students who entered in Sec 1. What NJC form teachers told us (parents) is that since sec 1, their main objective to is work our kids towards the end goal A Levels and pacing students to it.
100% of NYJC students intake are from JAE yet its A level results have been consistently better than many IP JCs. According to the A level results published there, NJC A level result slided only last year and prior years results were not as bad.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SGExams/comments/11551sg/a_level_results_2023_compilation/
As you rightfully pointed out, NYJC is up and coming JC, there was also one article about this school this year. This JC is like the 3rd JC in the rank after RI and HCI. Their JAE COP is also catching up RI and HCI. I do have friends' kids who qualified for IP but rather go to CCH for the affiliation to NYJC. Different students choose their paths differently for various reasons.
Anyway, as our minister says, all schools are good schools. How our kids turn out is also very much dependable on them. One at the \"best\" school can also turn out worse off than another one at the \"worst\" school.
I believe culture is equally, if not more important than results, it will help to shape our kids.