usaik881\" post_id=\"2098549\" time=\"1676989496\" user_id=\"199461:
A school is a public institution. This means it has a basic duty to the public, not just to those who are associated with it. As a public institution, future potential students, their parents, have a rightful claim to information from it; even for the curious by-stander.
Re information, we say it is a mistake for NO information to be the case, as some are clamoring. NO information makes everyone stupider.
Information, including frivolous information and even harmful misinformation, adds value. The noisier, the better. Because nobody kicks at a dead dog, when a place is noisy, it means something is cooking at that place. For those with a stake in it, it is only of the essence to give it a careful lookover.
We see names raised in the discussion, kaypoh, gossip. This is rather unfortunate, since these are actually the naturally existing sieving mechanisms the information world needs for correct decision making. Kaypohs, gossips, provide the noise, very necessary noise, for sieving out frivolous information and/or harmful information. (Re kaypohs, gossips, in a pleasanter and better mannered world, the correct word to use is by-stander.)
Information makes everyone smarter.
Let us cite an example: buying online. When we buy online, especially of an unfamiliar product or from an unfamiliar vendor, we always look at their reviews first. We normally won't risk buying when there are no reviews.
Even with a product and/or a vendor we are familiar with, such as a car, we still take a look at their reviews, although these reviews carry less weight in our buying decision.
When we look at these reviews, we always look at the negative comments first. Always. Because the negative comments alert us to unseen things which the eye misses. Granted some reviews can be frivolous. But the higher the stake, the more time we will spend sieving through them before we decide whether to buy or not to buy.
There are so many other information to ask like how’s the school culture, what are their teachers like, start times, what subject combi that can be taken etc.
But to specifically ask for their results and results only and then mention other top JCs revealing their results and kicking up a ruckus with all kinds of accusations about the school for not revealing their results, if this is not trying to compare which JC is better, then what is it?
There are so many other information about the school on their website. So why is there no transparency? Or only because they did not reveal their results for people to compare that they are being accused of hiding information and not being transparent?