In the recent open house, it was shared that MJC had hit near 80 points and some of top 5 JC did not hit this score. It was a very convincing statement which kept many of us thinking ‘really’…


It is certainly a young JC with a lot of determination to do well. The campus is Wifi connected, classrooms are air-condition, it gives us an impression that they will do well and very focused. The fact is they had done well in 2009 and could this be sustained? We should look out for their A level performance for 2010 releasing in April.

On the other hand, TJC is no doubt a good JC, but the campus structure is rather dated, it seems to be a little crowded considering they are going to start their IP for Sec 1 in 2012(it took yr 3 now). Impressive HOD as there were mini lectures given during the last open house.

It was difficult choice for us and in the end, we had made the selection based on travelling time.

It is rather interesting to hear the bonus point will be considered in the event when the net L1R5 are similar. I have rung up MOE this morning to clarify some questions and thought it may be good info to share.


Student Zac (with 9-2= 7) chooses JC A as choice #2 and
Student Sam (with 11-4= 7) chooses JC A as choice #1 and
Student Marc (with 9-0 = 9) chooses JC A as choice #1

Who will be admitted to JC A if Zac is not successful with his choice #1.

Answer provided by the MOE: It will be Zac and Sam and next criteria will be ‘citizenship’. If both are Singaporean, it will be computerised-selection but is it not based on the bonus points or gross L1R5!

I am done with JAE selection and we are eager to receive the result posting.





[/b]