Hi snow123, any idea how many students in RVHS IP? Thanks

Think dhs has 10 classes from A to J & 339 students. It is in the portal right hand side.

Dandelion76:

To be fair, I don't think he is aware. I have written to him to give feedback on this.

It is even scarier if he is not aware. If you do hear from him, please share what he has to say.[/quote]


He appreciates the feedback and will share it with his colleagues.[/quote]

Thanks zzz parent,

Hopefully he dun give standard answer like next time they will do it better etc etc...n move on.
I would like to see that he face the issue upfront and take immediate action, this batch of student are affected he owe us an explanation n action.[/quote]

I have referred him to this forum page and let him/moe team read by themselves. I do believe that there will always be cop for the TOP schools. It is not possible to pull everyone in just because everyone wants to get in. Moreover it may not be good for our kids if they are off cop by more than 2 points. Think the implementation of such change should be carefully considered and executed though.

Anyway, we have decided to move on and go for dhs last Saturday after seeing the different postings and info here. My Son's first choice was HCI and he was really disappointed when he knew he missed by one point. Maybe dhs is more suitable for him and a blessing in disguise

voltes5:

Zzzparent:

[quote=\"PlatypusAsia\"]Hello Voltes5, 25HMOM, onlyling,


I have heard that SJIJ announced to their boys at PSLE results collection day that SJI will not be able to accept any appeals from their own affiliated boys who did not meet affiliation COP.

Sometime before S1 posting on 22 Dec, I made enquiries about this piece of 'info' at SJIJ thread but no one there could confirm it.

It now looks like SJIJ had done the right thing by telling their boys about this MOE directive before the boys made their sec sch selection. It is then logical to conclude that all schools would have know this MOE directive before PSLE results were released. But many schools chose NOT to disclose this critical piece of information. So I do applaud SJIJ for standing up and being open to their boys about such a not-so-positive piece of info. If only all schools had done that. If only MOE had directed all primary schools to inform their pupils of this new directive. I find it hard to believe that MOE can be so myopic about this. Is it because our new acting minister in education is not experienced in dealing with such hot button public policies.

To be fair, I don't think he is aware. I have written to him to give feedback on this.

It is even scarier if he is not aware. If you do hear from him, please share what he has to say.[/quote]
He appreciates the feedback and will share it with his colleagues.

PlatypusAsia:

Hello Voltes5, 25HMOM, onlyling,


I have heard that SJIJ announced to their boys at PSLE results collection day that SJI will not be able to accept any appeals from their own affiliated boys who did not meet affiliation COP.

Sometime before S1 posting on 22 Dec, I made enquiries about this piece of 'info' at SJIJ thread but no one there could confirm it.

It now looks like SJIJ had done the right thing by telling their boys about this MOE directive before the boys made their sec sch selection. It is then logical to conclude that all schools would have know this MOE directive before PSLE results were released. But many schools chose NOT to disclose this critical piece of information. So I do applaud SJIJ for standing up and being open to their boys about such a not-so-positive piece of info. If only all schools had done that. If only MOE had directed all primary schools to inform their pupils of this new directive. I find it hard to believe that MOE can be so myopic about this. Is it because our new acting minister in education is not experienced in dealing with such hot button public policies.

To be fair, I don't think he is aware. I have written to him to give feedback on this.