TC’s computer & financial system

[concern2]

pirate:

concern2:

Question is - is CPIB smelling anything from all these?

Not unless some boyfriend or girlfriend makes a report.

[AC_Power]

Honestly, if PAP gets no kick back from appointing AIM and WP gets no cuts from appointing FMSS, there is no case for CPIB. Cos it is still a contract for service rendered and if the vendor overcharged because PAP or WP did no due diligence to ensure getting the best deal, it will be more of a procedural mistake. Will never be a corrupted practice.

[concern2]

winchester:

concern2:

Not trying to side WP, but based on the time period when HG had to find a contractor to do Town Council work, who would dare to have anything to do with THE OPPOSITIONS? There would have been so many questions of 'what if'...correct me if I am wrong.

true. only big companies like cpg, or wp-linked companies like fmss. fmss got $26 million in contracts, not bad for being loyal supporters to wp.

WP-linked means company owned by WP supporter is it? So what does one call a Party-member-owned company? Wah seh, if so, that would be multiple times the advantage that opposition supporters are getting, man... not to include PAP-supporters owned companies ..how many times more? 80% ? Multiplied by the number of years in the contract...? Or number of months? :siam:

[concern2]

AC_Power:

Honestly, if PAP gets no kick back from appointing AIM and WP gets no cuts from appointing FMSS, there is no case for CPIB. Cos it is still a contract for service rendered and if the vendor overcharged because PAP or WP did no due diligence to ensure getting the best deal, it will be more of a procedural mistake. Will never be a corrupted practice.

You sure or not, AC, no kick - spend $2 to buy toto also got some kick lah..
BTW, CPIB involved only when there is sex and $$ involved is it? :scratchhead:

[pirate]

concern2:

WP-linked means company owned by WP supporter is it? So what does one call a Party-member-owned company? Wah seh, if so, that would be multiple times the advantage that opposition supporters are getting, man... not to include PAP-supporters owned companies ..how many times more? 80% ? Multiplied by the number of years in the contract...? Or number of months? :siam:

Company owned by WP supporter = WP-linked company.

Company owned by PAP supporter = Independent third party company.

Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters = Independent third party company with a good track record.

Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters and beneficially owned by PAP controlled government = Independent third party company with a good track record and strong financial backing.

[ChiefKiasu]

pirate:

Company owned by WP supporter = WP-linked company.


Company owned by PAP supporter = Independent third party company.

Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters = Independent third party company with a good track record.

Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters and beneficially owned by PAP controlled government = Independent third party company with a good track record and strong financial backing.

OK... so what do you call a company co-owned by both PAP and WP supporters? :evil:

[pirate]

ChiefKiasu:

pirate:

Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters and beneficially owned by PAP controlled government = Independent third party company with a good track record and strong financial backing.

OK... so what do you call a company co-owned by both PAP and WP supporters? :evil:

See above.

[Irrelevant]

pirate:

Company owned by WP supporter = WP-linked company.

Company owned by PAP supporter = Independent third party company.

Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters = Independent third party company with a good track record.

Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters and beneficially owned by PAP controlled government = Independent third party company with a good track record and strong financial backing.

I LIKE!!!

One heck of a slippery slope our MIW are getting into.