Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary
-
The parent which call me on 18 February is Catherine lo from respect 9 class . She call me 2 times to delete the post. Which made me feel that the school parent network forum is not safe to post .i post is to share only.Regarding who should post here is ex parents,parents and to be parents of school network group not outsiders .
-
Time to chill.
This forum is free for all to chat, not restricted. -
dtck,
First thing first, thanks for the kindness shown in the last sentence of your last post.
Iirc, in that email you posted, I saw names of parents (which I initially assumed you folks don't mind sharing), work details, staff movements and full names of 3 teachers. To a group of us, posting teachers' personal details publicly goes beyond mere sharing. It crosses the line. It's massively disrespectful.
Thus, my response to you your purpose of posting that. Admittedly my response was curt (I was quite upset by then), but that's different from intimidation, otherwise you won't have contacted me. You initated PMs with me (contents I hope will remain private) afterwards and requested that I remove my response which I complied immediately.
I had the chance to communicate with a few other parents in your group as well. I was touched by their sharing. Yes, there's an urgent problem that needs to resolved, bcos P2ers' educational needs are at stake, let's work with the sch and do it constructively. -
dtck3004:
The parent which call me on 18 February is xxx from xxx class . She call me 2 times to delete the post. Which made me feel that the school parent network forum is not safe to post .i post is to share only.Regarding who should post here is ex parents,parents and to be parents of school network group not outsiders .
If you really think it is not safe to post, then go back to your above post to delete the name of the parent n the class.
There is obviously no reason for you to be so transparent with her details (while you uses a name that no one knows who you really are). -
FQW:
Thus, my response to you your purpose of posting that. Admittedly my response was curt (I was quite upset by then), ...
Bro, I did not get to see those posts b4 their deletion.
My sincere advice to you and all other members in this PH thread is never to reply a post when we feel upset. -
Jennifer:
It's difficult to disagree with that!!
If you really think it is not safe to post, then go back to your above post to delete the name of the parent n the class.
There is obviously no reason for you to be so transparent with her details (while you uses a name that no one knows who you really are).
:lovesite: -
Funx3:
hi funx3,
Yoohoo .... Someone Call me?Scary:
Jennifer,
Don't be hurt. We still need old birds like you, Funx3 and many others to share experiences with us. Frankly speaking, not only primary, but also secondary!!!
LONG TIME NO SEE. -
dtck3004:
The parent which call me on 18 February is Catherine lo from respect 9 class . She call me 2 times to delete the post. Which made me feel that the school parent network forum is not safe to post .i post is to share only.Regarding who should post here is ex parents,parents and to be parents of school network group not outsiders .
sharing is fine...after all, we are indeed here to share.
but certainly not sharing what is called 'personal details'. you know something, here at pei hwa thread, there are lots of sharing between parents about everything from ca1 to sa2, cca, bbq etc...never once had there been such a post like yours. when we praise our kids' teachers, there is no need to mention their names publicly. -
Previously, there have been open discussions/talk about the teaching competences (or lack of) of PH teachers, clearly identifiable either by their names/surnames, job title (e.g. Subject HOD), teaching level, or a combination of these identifiers.
The latest case was on 2 Jan 2014, on page 1943.
No objections were raised during those times.
For those parents whose children were/are taught by those teachers (myself included), I believe we appreciate the frank sharing and advice, to take certain pre-emptive measures, to be more involved in our children’s learning.
For the named teachers, they can take the opportunity to improve their teaching competences, for the benefit of the children they teach (ultimately, this is what we parents are concerned about, isn’t it), so much so that parents can turn around to compliment them. -
embel:
Previously, there have been open discussions/talk about the teaching competences (or lack of) of PH teachers, clearly identifiable either by their names/surnames, job title (e.g. Subject HOD), teaching level, or a combination of these identifiers.
The latest case was on 2 Jan 2014, on page 1943.
No objections were raised during those times.
For those parents whose children were/are taught by those teachers (myself included), I believe we appreciate the frank sharing and advice, to take certain pre-emptive measures, to be more involved in our children's learning.
For the named teachers, they can take the opportunity to improve their teaching competences, for the benefit of the children they teach (ultimately, this is what we parents are concerned about, isn't it), so much so that parents can turn around to compliment them.
I re-read the page 1943.
But I do not understand what you meant by No objections were raised during those times.
Kindly please clarify.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login