* Eunoia JC (EJC)
-
mc_007:
Not only need to find out why eat dead cat also need to find who cause them to walk or ride the 冤枉路 for 2 years so they can be more 心服口服.
What value are we trying to let the young generation know? If govt say something, no need to question, jus eat the dead cat \"吃死猫“？ Don't ask, or fight for your own rights?jetsetter:
At the end of the day, cannot means cannot, even highest authority - Min for Education 都放话出来了: \"I'm not saying that it is ideal when you have a delay, but the truth of the matter is there will be, in life, unforeseen circumstances...\"
So very likely, it'll still go back to square one, which is Mt Sinai!
放话出来了so what? No need to give explanations of what when wrong which are impacting other people's life? How do you know that the other parents of students (RGPS etc) that are forced to go to Mt Sinai are not unhappy? They don't voice out like the parents here do not mean they are happy with the arrangement.
This is year 2015, not the police wear shorts time.. accountability is the key.
Ask yourself, if your company suddenly shift to JB, you can still have a choice to change a job. These students DO NOT have a choice now. -
I am curious, for some mistakes made by MOE, the table has now been turned around to put the blame on these students and their parents and label them as \"strawberries\".
I urge affected parents to discuss this topic and stay focus on the issues on hand. MOE is obviously reading the posts here and have issued information circulars to address some of the issues raised.
With the planned dialogue, good for the affected parents to strategise and decide what needs to be raised in a rational and calm manner to MOE.
Just don't get side-tracked. -
pirated:
cherryc:
I'm impressed with the swift response immediately after my question of what is the exact amount of cost. Seems to me like some official response . Anyway , I'm just asking what is the cost needed for extensive rejunation.
The cost has already been mentioned many times liao. Not an immediate response to you la
Was the cost in dollar and cents quoted anywhere before for this new jc or for the extensive refurbishment ? I probably missed it . Kindly quote it. Was just afraid a repeat of $100 Mio to $300 Mio. Some of the response do have the timing that is different from us who work in min of \"home affairs\"..... -
cherryc:
That's what i have been trying to say. Thousands of them going to walk the extra mile because of some MOE planners sleeping on this projects or what?
Not only need to find out why eat dead cat also need to find who cause them to walk or ride the 冤枉路 for 2 years so they can be more 心服口服. -
For years, different batches have been using the RJC site without much issue, so why is it different this time? What is causing the angst and unhappiness?
It can’t be that all the strawberries are from these 3 schools right? Think harder. There must be something more complex than just designating the affected students as "strawberries".
It is the loss of credibility and mishandling of a simple matter that resulted in this situation today. -
As an affected parent with DD in SCGS, it’s true that the location is not our main concern but it doesn’t mean we feel nothing over the change of holding school site and delays of new IP JCs.
We made our choice of school based on the information available about the new IP JC and we trust MOE in delivering the “plan” and “promises”. While we try to understand unforeseen circumstances do happen but there is nothing wrong to feel disappointed over the lack of transparency in handling this issue and nothing wrong to feel injustice or betrayed by the changes.
Even though we are a minority as pointed out by some and the school is just a “small” school in the eyes of some and probably doesn’t warrant the attention but it also doesn’t mean the minority will just have to accept the ‘final decision’ in silence. We have the right to voice out our opinions as stakeholders.
If one day the company that I am working right now is going to shift from CBD district to Changi, I will consider to change job because I do not want to travel to Changi even though it is just a ‘few’ MRT stations away from CBD. Whatever decision I make, I have a choice. Some people do not mind travelling the longer distance because it is your choice and you make the choice based on your priorities and you are mentally prepared for it when you make the choice. It is totally different from an unexpected situation with no ‘choice’ for us. Because it concerns the critical 2 years in the preparation of A levels for our children and coupled with so many uncertainty and unknowns that we are anxious and worried.
I want to support those parents/students who are affected by distance because I do not see how choosing a school close to proximity which is what MOE is encouraging needs to be penalized with the changes with no options being offered. Why suddenly we are being criticized as being “over-protected” of our children and our kids are made of “paper”. It is MOE who is contradicting themselves over their message. It is indeed hurting to see such insensitive comments.
We went through the hard thinking process before we submitted our 6 choices of secondary school based on a lot of considerations. For whatever decision we made, we certainly hope and want the best for our children. There are a lot of lessons to be learnt from this whole issue and if MOE is not able to handle this issue properly, in my opinion, the implication is not only on affected students but future intakes to this new IP JC. I have another DD taking PSLE in 2 years’ time and if she qualifies for IP, I bet I am going to make my choice very carefully based on what I can see and not just a picture subjected to unforeseen circumstances because I do not want to risk another disappointment.
Last but not least, while I certainly would like to look at things positively, unfortunately I cannot be convinced at this point of time that the change would not turn out to be negative. A positive change will only happen when there is a concerted effort being put in to ensure things happen positively. -
Very well written snowyqueen! This is the kind of reasonable response I expect from any concerned parents or citizens . Without voicing all these concerns out, the matter would be closed with perhaps 2-3 official letters and history will repeat itself in other incidents and probably got worse each time. That’s not the future SG100 anyone wants to see. Especially we are showing examples to the " whatever-fruit-u-want-to-name it " generation . If you call them strawberries , then what about the adults who caused the errors ?
-
pirated:
30-days money back guarantee??
结婚要包生男儿吗？ -
Nebbermind:
Typo ? 300 days more reasonable
30-days money back guarantee??pirated:
结婚要包生男儿吗？ -
pirated:
Typo ? 300 days more reasonable[/quote]Still possible, 买一送一
30-days money back guarantee??Nebbermind:
[quote=\"pirated\"]
结婚要包生男儿吗？
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login