Property Views
-
starlight1968sg:
Is it possible to buy a condo unit under an owner instead of the usual husband & wife joint name?
yes for private. -
tankee:
What are the pros & cons using a single name ie either husband or wife?starlight1968sg:
Is it possible to buy a condo unit under an owner instead of the usual husband & wife joint name?
yes for private. -
only owner(s)’ CPF can be used to pay the loan if any
other factors
- sudden death or missing
- separation -
tankee:
Wait. Is that a pro or a con?
other factors
- sudden death or missing
- separation
-
pirated:
Actually now that ngl2010 flagged this out, I notice your second statement is irrelevant to our discussion on decoupling to avoid paying the 7% ABSD
Not first time buyer. Is first housing loan borrower without EXISTING housing loan. If previous loan fully paid, new loan is first loanjetsetter:
Not divorce but removal of one occupier's name only. I think it's possible.
http://jkfund.blogspot.sg/2014/06/hdb-decouple-topic-spr-sc-household.html
The impt thing is to get your spouse become a first-time buyer.
Maybe you could explain why you brought in that statement that if the previous loan has been fully paid, new loan becomes first loan? It's immaterial.
Yesterday, we were talking about getting the outgoing owner to complete the part-share sale (in HDB's case, I understand it must be \"transfer by gift\" according to that blogger) with the remaining owner first, so that the outgoing owner no longer owns anything in his name. By removing his name from the previous contract thru selling his 50% share to the remaining owner, he can then proceed to buy the second property like a new buyer (I used \"first time buyer\" loosely), and hence able to take up 80% loan and 'siam' the ABSD.
It doesn't matter if his first property's mortgage has been paid up fully or not. He is already out of that first contract and the remaining owner will have to work out with the bank to refinance the outstanding loan, or he/she can fork out some cash to pay up the loan fully if he/she is an unemployed housewife or retiree (which means some banks might hesitate to extend loan to this remaining owner). -
pirate:
Both are cons.
Wait. Is that a pro or a con?tankee:
other factors
- sudden death or missing
- separation
There are implications involved so decoupling isn't for every couple!
Most of us own properties in joint tenancy. If your spouse dies (touch wood), your joint property goes to your surviving spouse who becomes the sole owner. The latter just gets the lawyer to lodge a Notice of Death and property will be transferred to his/her sole name.
BUT, for tenant-in-common or sole ownership (in the case of Decoupling), you need a grant of probate or grant of letters of administration, etc. very mafan. So it's a con.
And if you divorce or dispute with your spouse in the future, and want to claim back that property you decoupled from...good luck!
But despite all these cons, many couples still consciously decouple because the pros include substantial monetary savings! It's not just saving of the ABSD, but also seller stamp duty for part share sale of the first property and so on. Better consult your financial consultant or banker to calculate the sums before decoupling. And ensure the remaining owner fulfils the TDSR requirement and LTV too. Don't leave the spouse in a lurch! -
jetsetter:
Sounds like a 'pro' to me from the point of view of \"your spouse\".
And if you divorce or dispute with your spouse in the future, and want to claim back that property you decoupled from...good luck!
-
JS -
It is possible that in the decoupling process the out-going owner may still be joint borrower of the mortgage. Hence if he buys a new ppty he may siam the ABSD but cannot take 80% loan because he has an existing housing loan.
Ownership and borrowing need not be mirror image. You can be a borrower but not the owner. Or be the owner but not the borrower. -
pirated:
Ownership and borrowing need not be mirror image. You can be a borrower but not the owner. Or be the owner but not the borrower.
I want to be the owner but not the borrower
-
starlight1968sg:
Yes you can when you have no income, and / or your spouse / joint-owner can single income pay for the mortgages, or you pay cash - no need to borrowpirated:
Ownership and borrowing need not be mirror image. You can be a borrower but not the owner. Or be the owner but not the borrower.
I want to be the owner but not the borrower
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login