[PSLE MT] PSLE less weightage in Chinese / Mother Tongue
-
joconde:
Singapore's Primary Maths and Science are top in the world, I don't think it is wise to risk the prestigious world placing by having Maths and Science as \"optional\" per the L1R5 style of system. More likely, this top in the world placing will be further strengthened to keep us at the top in the world every year.
This makes sense to students who are weak in MT but strong in math/sci. However, it would be unfair to students who are strong in MT and not math/sci-inclined. They will be greatly disadvantaged when it comes to sec 1 posting.James Ang:
Education Minister Ng Eng Hen says his ministry is studying whether it is educationally sound for mother tongue language performance to count for so much at the Primary 6 level.
'The worry is whether it could exclude someone from progressing in his educational pathway even if he did well in other subjects,' said Dr Ng in an interview with The Straits Times and Lianhe Zaobao.
Wouldn't it be fairer to have a system like L1R5 ? That is, student can choose to place the lower weightage on either mother tongue or math/sci, depending on his weak area.
-
MMM:
As I have written above :Is there a avenue that we can get our feedback to the MOE/ the Minister in charge on this issue ?
We are already losing our dialect speaking ability in our kiddos.... Are we going to lose Chinese too? :!:
Please use this feedback form and send your comments to MOE.
http://www.moe.gov.sg/feedback/ -
watmekiasu:
I totally agree with you too. I want my kids to enjoy learning Chinese, because of the wonderful language and culture. I don't understand why parents say that learning Chinese is a torture. Both my kids are very happy reading our wonderful Chinese picture books every night. Parents only have to make an effort to expose their kids to Chinese books from as young as possible. The best age to learn Chinese is from 3 to 6 years old. It is sad that because parents have prejudice towards the Chinese language, they influence their kids in a negative way.As a parent, it doesn't make any difference to me the weightage of Chinese in an exam. My daughter is learning Chinese for the language itself. No doubt with less weightage, there will be less stress on her as she spends an inordinate amount of time (70%) on that one subject alone. With less weightage, she can learn it at a more leisurely and enjoyable pace. I believe in the long run, because Chinese was not such a torture, it will bear fruits.
The PRC do well in English here because there is a total English immersion here. Try sending your child to China and you will see their Mandarin improve heaps.
One billion people in China are able to learn Chinese. It is totally not logical to say that there are kids who are excellent in English and Maths, but do not have the ability to do well in Chinese. The only problem is that the parents started to let them learn Chinese too late.
For example, if parents only read English books to kids before the age of 5, and only teach them ABCs and phonics, then kids will certainly be more comfortable with English and refuse to learn any other languages that is different from English.
In the case of my kids, I teach them to read English, while my mother reads many Chinese story books to them every night, since they were babies. That is why my kids enjoy reading both English and Chinese books, so long as the books are good. -
tamarind:
Thanks for the linkverykiasu2010:
need to combine some effort to present our views to the MOE on Chn ? I know some will shoot me down now .....lol
Please use this feedback form and send your comments to MOE.
http://www.moe.gov.sg/feedback/
I have written to them a few times on other matters, they do get the relevant officer to send a proper reply. We need thousands of parents to send in their comments in order for something to be done.
This is the best way to get our views heard. The gahmen do not care about comments in the internet forums. They want to hear comments from real people.
Yah, they are worried about \"astroturfing\" ... -
my first impression: WT…
unfair to those non-english speaking family, should cut english weighting.
same apply to those weak at Math, Science -
tamarind:
don't think that it is easy for the people in PRC to learn and teach chinese language too, they have at least 56 major language groups & tribes ....and if you notice their money, the Rmb, at least has 4 languages printed on it ......
I totally agree with you too. I want my kids to enjoy learning Chinese, because of the wonderful language and culture. I don't understand why parents say that learning Chinese is a torture. Both my kids are very happy reading our wonderful Chinese picture books every night. Parents only have to make an effort to expose their kids to Chinese books from as young as possible. The best age to learn Chinese is from 3 to 6 years old. It is sad that because parents have prejudice towards the Chinese language, they influence their kids in a negative way.watmekiasu:
As a parent, it doesn't make any difference to me the weightage of Chinese in an exam. My daughter is learning Chinese for the language itself. No doubt with less weightage, there will be less stress on her as she spends an inordinate amount of time (70%) on that one subject alone. With less weightage, she can learn it at a more leisurely and enjoyable pace. I believe in the long run, because Chinese was not such a torture, it will bear fruits.
The PRC do well in English here because there is a total English immersion here. Try sending your child to China and you will see their Mandarin improve heaps.
One billion people in China are able to learn Chinese. It is totally not logical to say that there are kids who are excellent in English and Maths, but do not have the ability to do well in Chinese. The only problem is that the parents started to let them learn Chinese too late.
we are just taking the easy way out -
Frankly speaking, I think that nowadays the Chinese is tougher compared to my times. Just look at their comprehension/cloze passages, and the type of phrases that the teachers expect to see in the student’s compo. Even when you look at the composition guidebooks, they are filled with bombastic phrases, which I think is definitely beyond the kids ability. Lowering the weightage maybe a good thing cos MOE got to be realistic about the fact that most kids come from English-speaking family background. As a Chinese, I have always stressed to my kids that they must know how to read, write and speak Chinese fluently. However, the local environment says otherwise when almost every subject is taught in English.
-
money9090:
yah men, if they want to cut chn weighting, then must cut weighting for math / science / engl too....certain races always being mentioned weaker in math, and certain people group always weaker in engl, and many students are weak in science too .... lower the standard overall lar, or make the marking scheme easier la...make 50% of the cohort each get 4 A* la.....then i can tell you, the secondary school will set their own entrance exams.....isn't some of them already doing so via DSA ?my first impression: WT...
unfair to those non-english speaking family, should cut english weighting.
same apply to those weak at Math, Science -
I have been reading these books, written by 2 mommies in China :
好妈妈胜过好老师
尹建莉
http://product.dangdang.com/product.aspx?product_id=20464285&ref=order-2-A
四五快读
http://tamarindvillage.blogspot.com/2009/12/teaching-chinese-at-home.html
The first author taught her daughter to be able to read long Chinese novels by 8 years old. She said that her daughter is by no means gifted, all she did was to read many Chinese story books with her. The second author taught her daughter to read thick Chinese books before the age of 5. It didn't take a lot of effort, and both girls enjoyed learning very much. All it takes are effective methods, and start very young. Both mommies taught their daughters to read without hanyu pinyin.
I have often heard of exceptionally bright kids in Singapore who are able to read long English novels by 5 years old. These same kids can be taught to read long Chinese novels by the same age too, if only parents make an effort to read Chinese story books to them. -
Pen88n:
:goodpost:Learning languages should be a positive experience for kids to love and appreciate the language. Based on Singapore's Chinese standard, it is not that high and by lowering it further, I dread to think what will the Chinese learning in Singapore education becomes.
If it is just because Chinese is not a compulsory in points computation in secondary as mentioned in the papers, shouldn't the same apply to Maths and Science? No subject is compulsory in secondary points except English, I think. Why the biasness towards Chinese only? Just because some kids and parents complain about Chinese being difficult to learn? what about Maths - didn't enough parents and kids complain about the high maths standard in PSLE and is MOE doing anything about it?
Can't agree more with you.
What about kids who are strong in MT, Maths and Science but weak in EL? Wouldn't it be unfair too if they can't get into top schools because of that?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login