* Nanyang JC (NYJC)
-
25MOM, ParkYuni, please leave this NYJC Forum.
You have presented your views. So just leave.
Both of you are creating havoc in here. People reading these forum can see both of you are out to debate pertaining to any NYJC stuff.
What’s that got to do with both of you.
Can both of you don’t be afraid potential students will be sway after reading the formation given here.
matured parents and even students have the clear mind to be able to decide which JC to choose.
Both of you please dont be scare they choose wrongly and get cheated into a JC not worth.
Parents and students can go Open House, find out from seniors etc.
both of you always appear in the same Forum.
Very scare of both of you too.
As parents, we should not be behaving this way. Even if you think its wrong to state this or that with or w/out facts, its all right lah.
Still cannot be so fierce.
So just leave, please.
I won’t reply to any of you. -
Chip n Dale:
There are 2 types of debaters here:25MOM, ParkYuni, please leave this NYJC Forum.
You have presented your views. So just leave.
Both of you are creating havoc in here. People reading these forum can see both of you are out to debate pertaining to any NYJC stuff.
What's that got to do with both of you.
Can both of you don't be afraid potential students will be sway after reading the formation given here.
matured parents and even students have the clear mind to be able to decide which JC to choose.
Both of you please dont be scare they choose wrongly and get cheated into a JC not worth.
Parents and students can go Open House, find out from seniors etc.
both of you always appear in the same Forum.
Very scare of both of you too.
As parents, we should not be behaving this way. Even if you think its wrong to state this or that with or w/out facts, its all right lah.
Still cannot be so fierce.
So just leave, please.
I won't reply to any of you.
Type 1: Those who are safeguarding the COP of NYJC and fearful that any information detrimental to NYJC may decrease its chance of further escalating up its ranking ladder. They are enjoying its success and do not wish to see its success being shattered by their competitors. They will try to silence its competitors and shoo away unwelcomed guests. They may also be people who do not like ACJC & TJC & are using NYJC to beat these JCs.
Type 2: Those who feel that NYJC improved COP is not justifiable and will affect ACJC & TJC rankings in the future which they have an interest in. They want others to learn more about NYJC as compared with other JCs and make comparisons and hence better decisions.
I won't say they are immatured parents but they are cleverly working their ways out to satisfy their personal agenda.
Hence I won't interfere with arguments like these. Leave the forum if you genuinely do not have any interest in it. I am doing so now.
:siam: -
Chip n Dale:
Oh Chip N Dale, you are back in action. I knew that when Crester leave, you will take over for obvious reasons. Both of you will not appear together here but in SNGS's thread in the past.25MOM, ParkYuni, please leave this NYJC Forum.
You have presented your views. So just leave.
Both of you are creating havoc in here. People reading these forum can see both of you are out to debate pertaining to any NYJC stuff.
What's that got to do with both of you.
Can both of you don't be afraid potential students will be sway after reading the formation given here.
matured parents and even students have the clear mind to be able to decide which JC to choose.
Both of you please dont be scare they choose wrongly and get cheated into a JC not worth.
Parents and students can go Open House, find out from seniors etc.
both of you always appear in the same Forum.
Very scare of both of you too.
As parents, we should not be behaving this way. Even if you think its wrong to state this or that with or w/out facts, its all right lah.
Still cannot be so fierce.
So just leave, please.
I won't reply to any of you.
Presently, Crester is being used to promote NYJC in SNGS thread. Nothing wrong to sell it to your DD's juniors and it's noble to spread good news.
Didn't you say you visited VJC with your DD? So are you feeling very bitter now that you had not chosen VJC over NYJC as the latter's results were a disappointment to your belief of its superior 'value-addedness'?
Well, all is not lost because NYJC has many other plus points that are worth considering when making a choice. Please do not be afraid that our sharing of other JCs stats will affect NYJC's ranking.
We are debating as we had been challenged to debate by mindays.
Aren't you doing the same by trying to oust us so that others won't sway in their decisions?
Didn't you, aka Crester, tried desperately to rank NYJC above ACJC & TJC. See who's calling another immatured and as a parent, you should not display such kiasu example to your DD.
You should advise mindays not to be so fierce as an action will only result in a reaction. Get your facts right. -
mindays:
I agree that there is no difference between the standards of teaching for nyjc, acjc and tjc.25HMOM:
[quote=\"KTKS\"]
Thank you for sharing. For sure there are many parents who like their kids jcs to be flexible although I am an exception.
I was just a little disappointed as I had expected NYJC results to be better and closer to VJC based on its recent COP:
2014 COP of JC for 2015 JC1 admission:
NYJC (7/8) VJC (5/6) ACJC (6/7) TJC (7/8)
2015 COP of JC for 2016 JC1 admission:
NYJC(6/7) VJC (5/6) ACJC (7/7) TJC (9/9)
However, 2015 A level results are similar between NYJC, ACJC and TJC but all differ much from that of VJC.
Due to the latest cop of 6, 7 and 9 for nyjc, acjc and tjc science stream, respectively, speculation has it that nyjc has higher value-added into its jc and hence its surge in popularity. Now it is proven to be untrue.
I would like to add that the batch of 2015 'A' Level graduates are students who were from:
2013 COP of JC for 2014 JC1 Admission
It is clearly not 2014 COP of JC for 2015 JC1 admission
Please do not create unnecessary confusion that misleads other people.[/quote]I apologise for my blunder in providing the 2014 COPS instead of 2013's that had sparked the misunderstandings and debates in this thread. I have no intention to mislead others.
NYJC has many good points worth considering but I am a practical person who is result-orientated and also the jc's environment must be a good fit for my ds. I will be monitoring this jc and some others for ds.
Imho, by collecting more info does help one in making better decision so I am selfishly thankful for the debates here that have benefited me and widen my perspectives of things.
However, I wish they can be conveyed more amicably.
Thank you, everyone. -
ParkYuni:
And SOME people do not understand the intention of my post. It is of great regrets that we have a fellow here. To the other people who are reading this thread, maintain your objectivity and judge for yourself. Am I trying to downplay any JCs? Have I ever said that NYJC's popularity is not due solely to its academic results? So you see, the power of our dear forummer's interpretation of posts. This is what I mean by substandard views that confuse the population at KP.2013 cop for 2014 jc1 admission to:
nyjc - 8/8
acjc - 6/7
tjc - 7/7
2015 cop for 2016 jc1 admission to :
nyjc - 6/7
acjc - 7/7
tjc - 9/9
A level classes of 2013 batch UAP results:
nyjc - 81 (someone said cannot report that it could be 80.xx, must be whole number as per P)
acjc - 81.9 (a supporter of nyjc said cannot be true, it was hearsay 80 only, whole number)
tjc - around 80 (someone suggested must be 80, not 80.xx or 81, must ignore the word around)
Hence the 3 jcs results differ very greatly in uap and A level results, as someone who declared to be fair and objective suggested and the forummer who said they are similar must apologise to public for misleading. :yikes:
and the same person thinks that the one who downplayed acjc and tjc results need not apologise for misleading. :evil:
Speculation has it that nyjc has continued to achieve sustained high value-addedness that is the main reason for its improvement of cop. However, ex-nyjc pupils attributed this improvement in cop to other factors other than its academic achievements.
Some people just refused to accept that nyjc popularity is NOT due solely to its academic results.
Show me the evidence and quote, if otherwise. -
25HMOM:
Wow we have a sweeping statement there! So, I am ill-informed? Let the others decide and see who has the greatest empty joke. I would agree that non-academic factors may have influenced the students more than academic factors like (credible and proven record). BUT, it is wrong for you to over generalise to say EVERYONE! Moreover, I am sure students and parents will look out for the academic results of NY too.
Everyone is aware that NYJC improvement in COP is not due to its proven and credible record but due to its environment such as jc culture, flexibility and the father-figure Principal it has. These are feedback from the seniors of NYJC. You are so ill-informed and yet made such a big hoo-haa here. Joke of the millenium indeed.mindays:
NY has seen gradual improvement in L1R5 score (6 (Science) in 2016's JAE). Why the drop? It must be the proven and credible records that NY has produced over the years. Scorers of AT LEAST a minimum 8 RAW L1r5 score are believed to be rational and to have enough sense to do their due diligence and homework before deciding on a JC. They chose NY out of the 19JCs (not including SJI and ACS(I)) because they trust NY. They believe in NY. They know their potential in NY. I would wish to continue further but time does not permit.
Furthermore, how does one do his homework if NYJC is not publishing their academic achievements? It is through us forummers who take the pain to gather as much facts as possible to lay on the table.
We are not forcing anyone to accept our opinions as our target audience are 'scorers of AT LEAST a minimum 8 RAW L1r5 score are believed to be rational and to have enough sense to do their due diligence and homework before deciding on a JC', mind you, mindays. Think before you leap.
P/s: There are 10 pointers in NYJC currently too
Quoted from NYJC's website as a reason why one should go to NYJC:
\"We are serious in our work and we are constantly looking for ways to enhance our programmes, to upgrade our facilities and to strenghten our relationships so that we are not just providers of a curriculum but also fellow partners in our students’ success in their lives. The college has been a proud recipient of the Value-Added Awards for both academic and non-academic achievements every year since 2007.\"
So you are making a hullabaloo. (hoo-haa is not English, what's that?) You are trying to confuse the others, so stop.
You don't just not do your homework when you can't find the source from the internet. This just shows you have no vested interest to want to find out more from other sources. You basically think that the only source to get information is INTERNET and have neglected other useful sources. You are not thinking critically, often jumping the gun, which misleads so many people who are reading your posts. Don't you think you should be more responsible to vet what you post? You don't get what I mean? Think critically...
Yes, I may have missed out 10 pointers too. I am sure that the majority of this year's cohort is 8 RAW as some other forummers have pointed out in other threads that their dd and ds who got 10-4 couldn't get in.
Alright, correction: scorers of AT LEAST a minimum 10 RAW L1r5 score are believed to be rational and to have enough sense to do their due diligence and homework before deciding on a JC. -
mindays:
Who are you to keep asking others to feed you with evidence when you have nothing to help others make better decisions?
And SOME people do not understand the intention of my post. It is of great regrets that we have a fellow here. To the other people who are reading this thread, maintain your objectivity and judge for yourself. Am I trying to downplay any JCs? Have I ever said that NYJC's popularity is not due solely to its academic results? So you see, the power of our dear forummer's interpretation of posts. This is what I mean by substandard views that confuse the population at KP.ParkYuni:
2013 cop for 2014 jc1 admission to:
nyjc - 8/8
acjc - 6/7
tjc - 7/7
2015 cop for 2016 jc1 admission to :
nyjc - 6/7
acjc - 7/7
tjc - 9/9
A level classes of 2013 batch UAP results:
nyjc - 81 (someone said cannot report that it could be 80.xx, must be whole number as per P)
acjc - 81.9 (a supporter of nyjc said cannot be true, it was hearsay 80 only, whole number)
tjc - around 80 (someone suggested must be 80, not 80.xx or 81, must ignore the word around)
Hence the 3 jcs results differ very greatly in uap and A level results, as someone who declared to be fair and objective suggested and the forummer who said they are similar must apologise to public for misleading. :yikes:
and the same person thinks that the one who downplayed acjc and tjc results need not apologise for misleading. :evil:
Speculation has it that nyjc has continued to achieve sustained high value-addedness that is the main reason for its improvement of cop. However, ex-nyjc pupils attributed this improvement in cop to other factors other than its academic achievements.
Some people just refused to accept that nyjc popularity is NOT due solely to its academic results.
Show me the evidence and quote, if otherwise.
Did I specify that you are the one who downplayed other JCs? So ignorant. I am referring to crester.
Why bother to argue for the sake of arguing when you have nothing at your end to prove otherwise?
Gather more information before you come back here. -
With such debates, I hope it will give people a clearer picture of NYJC and not be fooled by people who are trying to downplay NYJC (without facts).
NOTE: Please look at all posts with sharp analysis and make a sound judgement. Do not let the majority affect you views. Instead, look out for their agenda and quality of post. By that, I mean how well can they backed up with SOLID evidence.
Thank you all. -
ParkYuni:
Who are you to keep asking others to feed you with evidence when you have nothing to help others make better decisions?
And SOME people do not understand the intention of my post. It is of great regrets that we have a fellow here. To the other people who are reading this thread, maintain your objectivity and judge for yourself. Am I trying to downplay any JCs? Have I ever said that NYJC's popularity is not due solely to its academic results? So you see, the power of our dear forummer's interpretation of posts. This is what I mean by substandard views that confuse the population at KP.mindays:
[quote=\"ParkYuni\"]2013 cop for 2014 jc1 admission to:
nyjc - 8/8
acjc - 6/7
tjc - 7/7
2015 cop for 2016 jc1 admission to :
nyjc - 6/7
acjc - 7/7
tjc - 9/9
A level classes of 2013 batch UAP results:
nyjc - 81 (someone said cannot report that it could be 80.xx, must be whole number as per P)
acjc - 81.9 (a supporter of nyjc said cannot be true, it was hearsay 80 only, whole number)
tjc - around 80 (someone suggested must be 80, not 80.xx or 81, must ignore the word around)
Hence the 3 jcs results differ very greatly in uap and A level results, as someone who declared to be fair and objective suggested and the forummer who said they are similar must apologise to public for misleading. :yikes:
and the same person thinks that the one who downplayed acjc and tjc results need not apologise for misleading. :evil:
Speculation has it that nyjc has continued to achieve sustained high value-addedness that is the main reason for its improvement of cop. However, ex-nyjc pupils attributed this improvement in cop to other factors other than its academic achievements.
Some people just refused to accept that nyjc popularity is NOT due solely to its academic results.
Show me the evidence and quote, if otherwise.
Did I specify that you are the one who downplayed other JCs? So ignorant. I am referring to crester.
Why bother to argue for the sake of arguing when you have nothing at your end to prove otherwise?
Gather more information before you come back here.[/quote]
Now, you see, another poor interpretation from our fellow ParkYuni. Did I specify that you were targeting at me? I merely proposed questions to let others think about it. So ignorant. Look at the substandard response. You are making a useless post indeed.
Do you know what I mean by evidence? Perhaps you don't. You are the opposition while I am the proposition. You are supposed to back up whatever things you post.
Why bother to argue for the sake of arguing when you have nothing at your end to prove otherwise?
Think and read before you come back here. -
mindays, since you are a conceited teenager with nothing to offer but a bunch of harsh words and is treating this thread as your playground to confuse others, I shan’t respond to you until you have gathered useful information to help the viewers here. Till then…farewell!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login