Any Updates As To When PSLE T-Scores Will Be Scrapped?

[jetsetter]

They also need to equalise the scores of those who’ve been exempted from Mother Tongue.


3 subjects vs 4 subjects.

[pirate]

jetsetter:

They also need to equalise the scores of those who've been exempted from Mother Tongue.


3 subjects vs 4 subjects.

Make it L1R2. :scared: :siam:

[pirate]

3Boys:

...then affiliation priority how?

I copy from P1 registration last time...

Give them 2 ballot tickets instead of one. :evil:

[Pen88n]

pirate:

jetsetter:

They also need to equalise the scores of those who've been exempted from Mother Tongue.


3 subjects vs 4 subjects.

Make it L1R2. :scared: :siam:

Then might as well drop MT then - since it is a 2nd language and not featured in your proposed equation :yikes: :faint: :siam:

[jetsetter]

Pen88n:

pirate:

[quote=\"jetsetter\"]They also need to equalise the scores of those who've been exempted from Mother Tongue.


3 subjects vs 4 subjects.

Make it L1R2. :scared: :siam:

Then might as well drop MT then - since it is a 2nd language and not featured in your proposed equation :yikes: :faint: :siam:[/quote] :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:

[Pen88n]

Are you sure having many p6ers having same score banding and then ended up balloting for schools will be less stressful for kids and parents than the current T-score system? :scratchhead:


In future, even if the kid score well and have good results, the family will still have to worry about his / her luck in getting into whichever school they want (can be distance, school culture, etc.) :nailbite:

[pirate]

Pen88n:

pirate:

[quote=\"jetsetter\"]They also need to equalise the scores of those who've been exempted from Mother Tongue.


3 subjects vs 4 subjects.

Make it L1R2. :scared: :siam:

Then might as well drop MT then - since it is a 2nd language and not featured in your proposed equation :yikes: :faint: :siam:[/quote] :imanangel:

[sleepy]

MyPillow:

lee_yl:

T-score is straight forward, objective and transparent, worked well for us for the past 30 years, albeit with some negative points. Parents complained and asked for something else, what if the new process is now more subjective and opaque? Blame who?

i thought majority of parents hope for a lighter syllabus for pri kids, to have more happi learning culture , true joy of learning, more excursions, less tests/exams etc this type of holistic/ new chg is never in my radar .in fact i was caught by surprise - by the way the authority is adding more ingredients to the not so simple psle

这情况算不算 '求仁反不得仁'? :nailbite:

[zulu]

Pen88n:

Are you sure having many p6ers having same score banding and then ended up balloting for schools will be less stressful for kids and parents than the current T-score system? :scratchhead:


In future, even if the kid score well and have good results, the family will still have to worry about his / her luck in getting into whichever school they want (can be distance, school culture, etc.) :nailbite:

Those parents whose kids are expected to be high scorers would definitely not think that balloting is such a good idea. Conversely those parents whose kids are above average but not right at the top might find the idea of balloting more palatable.

[dimsum]

pirate:

Pen88n:

[quote=\"pirate\"]
Make it L1R2. :scared: :siam:

Then might as well drop MT then - since it is a 2nd language and not featured in your proposed equation :yikes: :faint: :siam:

:imanangel:[/quote]If it is gg to be L1R2, first thing i will do is to drop my child\"s Chinese enrichment. His maths and science are stronger than Chinese and he probably spends 60% of his study time on Chinese alone.