* Nanyang JC (NYJC)

[ilovelaksa]

Crester:

https://s21.postimg.org/vr3lud587/16904592_1456264094386860_6860179130845709507_o.jpg\">


The class of 2016 gave a fantastic performance in the A Level exam.
:congrats:

:congrats: to Nanyang JC. Looks like the JCs hv good report cards this yr!

[Crester]

ilovelaksa:

Crester:

https://s21.postimg.org/vr3lud587/16904592_1456264094386860_6860179130845709507_o.jpg\">


The class of 2016 gave a fantastic performance in the A Level exam.
:congrats:

:congrats: to Nanyang JC. Looks like the JCs hv good report cards this yr!

Thanks, ilovelaksa.
VJC gave outstanding performance too. :xedfingers:

[ilovelaksa]

Crester:

ilovelaksa:

[quote=\"Crester\"]https://s21.postimg.org/vr3lud587/16904592_1456264094386860_6860179130845709507_o.jpg\">


The class of 2016 gave a fantastic performance in the A Level exam.
:congrats:

:congrats: to Nanyang JC. Looks like the JCs hv good report cards this yr!

Thanks, ilovelaksa.
VJC gave outstanding performance too. :xedfingers:[/quote]There are others who didnt do well or performed below expectations accordg to my son. It was rather heartbreaking to see their reaction especially when there are so many happy ones. They put in their best, so I think it is more than enough.
May Nanyang JC continue to soar new heights next year!

[thsheng99]

UBKmom:

Anyone know the A level results for NYJC? I only see from their website saying that their have a happy problem of not having a stage large enough to contain all their Honour Roll awardees but no detail of their result......after so much discussions taken place here, I guess alot of people is interested to know the facts.

Yes. don't know why they are so secretive in publishing their result, especially when they claimed its good. Somebody posted here that you need to schedule a meeting with the principal to know the detailed performance of the school :shock:

[Crester]

thsheng99:

UBKmom:

Anyone know the A level results for NYJC? I only see from their website saying that their have a happy problem of not having a stage large enough to contain all their Honour Roll awardees but no detail of their result......after so much discussions taken place here, I guess alot of people is interested to know the facts.

Yes. don't know why they are so secretive in publishing their result, especially when they claimed its good. Somebody posted here that you need to schedule a meeting with the principal to know the detailed performance of the school :shock:

I was referring to detailed performance like subjects grades. Not all jcs here post their individual subjects grades performance.
Its just my suggestion if you really have an interest in Nyjc.
The college has the right not to divulge its results.
Nyjc has posted photos of their Top Honours students is 1 way of its fantastic A Level performance.

[phtthp]

thsheng99:

UBKmom:

Anyone know the A level results for NYJC? I only see from their website saying that their have a happy problem of not having a stage large enough to contain all their Honour Roll awardees but no detail of their result......after so much discussions taken place here, I guess alot of people is interested to know the facts.

Yes. don't know why they are so secretive in publishing their result, especially when they claimed its good. Somebody posted here that you need to schedule a meeting with the principal to know the detailed performance of the school :shock:

parents, students are more interested in the individual subject H2 grades performance, esp. when combination like BCME (Bio, Chem, Maths, Econs) or PCME (Physics, Chem, Maths, Econs) are very popular subject combination, taken by A level students.

not sure why this JC is secretive, over detailed subjects' performance breakdown.

[UBKmom]

phtthp:

thsheng99:

Yes. don't know why they are so secretive in publishing their result, especially when they claimed its good. Somebody posted here that you need to schedule a meeting with the principal to know the detailed performance of the school :shock:

parents, students are more interested in the individual subject H2 grades performance, esp. when combination like BCME (Bio, Chem, Maths, Econs) or PCME (Physics, Chem, Maths, Econs) are very popular subject combination, taken by A level students.

not sure why this JC is secretive, over detailed subjects' performance breakdown.

There is zero information released from NYJC on their A level performance, not even general one like mean/median UAS, % of 3As, 3H2 pass w pass in GP/KI etc...I don't think they will ever release individual subject performance..

I am quite puzzle...NYJC is one of the top JC and they already said they have performed well...why their reluctance to release even one bit of info...

[zbear]

UBKmom:

I am quite puzzle...NYJC is one of the top JC and they already said they have performed well...why their reluctance to release even one bit of info...

I didn't know NYJC is one of the top JCs. I only know NYJC is a popular JC based on O level COP.

[mjl]

I do not have any kid with NYJC, but I think we should really respect the NYJC school management for their decision to release or not to release their A level results, or how much to release.


You know, a certain JC gives description like "close to 8 out of 10" score distinctions for some H2 subjects, clearly to their advantage. How do you know, the "close to 8" may be 7.5? And these top JCs tend to publish only subjects/statistics which they did well, not those they fared not so well. For fair comparison, every JC should follow a standard template. Else, you really should just take these with a pinch of salt.

Do respect any JC’s choice whether to publish any results, or how much to publish. And don’t compare them.

[Crester]

mjl:

I do not have any kid with NYJC, but I think we should really respect the NYJC school management for their decision to release or not to release their A level results, or how much to release.


You know, a certain JC gives description like \"close to 8 out of 10\" score distinctions for some H2 subjects, clearly to their advantage. How do you know, the \"close to 8\" may be 7.5? And these top JCs tend to publish only subjects/statistics which they did well, not those they fared not so well. For fair comparison, every JC should follow a standard template. Else, you really should just take these with a pinch of salt.

Do respect any JC's choice whether to publish any results, or how much to publish. And don't compare them.

:goodpost: