Logo
    • Education
      • Pre-School
      • Primary Schools Directory
      • Primary Schools Articles
      • P1 Registration
      • DSA
      • PSLE
      • Secondary
      • Tertiary
      • Special Needs
    • Lifestyle
      • Well-being
    • Activities
      • Events
    • Enrichment & Services
      • Find A Service Provider
      • Enrichment Articles
      • Enrichment Services
      • Tuition Centre/Private Tutor
      • Infant Care/ Childcare / Student Care Centre
      • Kindergarten/Preschool
      • Private Institutions and International Schools
      • Special Needs
      • Indoor & Outdoor Playgrounds
      • Paediatrics
      • Neonatal Care
    • Forum
    • ASKQ
    • Register
    • Login

    [PSLE MT] PSLE less weightage in Chinese / Mother Tongue

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Secondary Schools - Selection
    1.0k Posts 91 Posters 350.8k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • MMMM Offline
      MMM
      last edited by

      Did everyone read the news on ST today. It had a coverage of views from both camps. It does appear that based on feedback to the forum. Around 80% are against lowering of MT.


      I also found it heartening to know that those against the lowering of MT are young professionals who had benefitted from the bilingual system.

      Another interesting observation was the 1991 GE results where due to CL decision at that point, it cost the ruling party 4 seats. Is our GE round the corner???

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        tamarind
        last edited by

        dimsum:
        ksi:


        Tamarind, I suppose the main data point is LKY. He stood up to say that it was a feat from a bio point for some people. For LKY to make such statements, it would be assumed that he had done his research sufficiently to make the statements. Of course there is a possibilty of error but let's give him some benefit of doubt.

        Ermmm.. he made those statements based on his own personal learning experience (but he learned at an old age) and what her neurologist daughter said. So, I won't say it's based on some solid, scientific research.

        That's right. We should only listen to experts in education who have conducted extensive research on a huge number of kids. These people must also be experts in Chinese. Not just based on personal experiences only. LKY was a lawyer and politician, not an educator, and he is certainly not an expert in the Chinese language. A chinese teacher in primary school is more qualified than him to make any comments about this issue, because the teacher has taught hundreds of children, LKY has not.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          HyperKiasu
          last edited by

          If there is no scientific evidence of MT disability, then ATTITUDE is the only explanation of why one can be tortured by MT given same good MT exposure at early age.

          Perhaps those 10% are fully loaded thus able to afford giving up MT. they always have backup plan…

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V Offline
            verykiasu2010
            last edited by

            tamarind:
            That's right. We should only listen to experts in education who have conducted extensive research on a huge number of kids. These people must also be experts in Chinese. Not just based on personal experiences only. LKY was a lawyer and politician, not an educator, and he is certainly not an expert in the Chinese language. A chinese teacher in primary school is more qualified than him to make any comments about this issue, because the teacher has taught hundreds of children, LKY has not.


            The fact is, LKY in his adulthood can make it in learning mandarin, why the young kids with all the teachers' help, cannot ? The ultimate analysis conclusion : attitude and will / determination. If the parents day in day out say it is difficult, the kids will find it so. If the parents say it is not difficult but is achievable, it can be achieved.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N Offline
              nan.014182nan
              last edited by

              http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Ts9SsiA


              A more meaningful thing to do, really is to set up a \"It is not too late to learn MT/CL\" foundation, to take care of people like 3Boys. Like he said, no stick. Use carrot.

              I will volunteer my service. Anyone ? We can start a facebook page.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • corneyAmberC Offline
                corneyAmber
                last edited by

                Everyone, please bear in mind that LKY learned spoken Mandarin and what the children need to do in school is of higher proficiency than just spoken Mandarin. Also, for LKY, he has a political need to do so, so he has a strong motivation behind him and being an adult, he has also the maturity to understand why he needs to do so. For his Mandarin speeches, they were prepared for him, he only needed to learn the HYPY to deliver them. Can he script it himself? I doubt so but I give him alot of credit for learning spoken Mandarin at his age like all of you.


                Children only know about fun, they don’t understand everything that LKY can understand as an adult, so the motivation is weak as long as the lesson is not engaging for them.

                With that, I like to caution that while we are passionately putting across our reasons on MT should not be lowered, we should refrain from overcondemning why people cannot learn. They are people who really cannot and it is really an aptitude issue, we should leave it at that as they are, in any case, minority, no point moving the opposition up the creek and all things go irrational. There is no benefit to all.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V Offline
                  verykiasu2010
                  last edited by

                  we do not condemn people who does not want to learn MT


                  what we are saying is that it is unfair to lower the weightage of any subject just to suit certain group of people

                  it is simply unfair

                  either abolish it or make it equal weightage

                  a pupil who can master all 4 subjects is simply more capable and more deserving than one who can only master 3 subjects

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    sleepy
                    last edited by

                    Say hypothetically weightage is lowered to 20%


                    If some feel that lowering Chinese weightage can allow children to concentrate on the bigger slice of cake, I think their Maths is not right. 20% is still substantial! To be top of cohort, every tiny % counts, isn't it?



                    As for my personal stand, I'm pretty neutral whether MOE remain or reduce weightage.

                    Will simply tell my kids to garner any marks they can :ugogirl: :boogie:

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      shine
                      last edited by

                      sleepy:
                      Say hypothetically weightage is lowered to 20%
                      Don't think it can be 20%. It'll be difficult to divide the remaining 80% into 3 equally for the other 3 subjects. More likely 22% or 19%. If not, then one other subject need to reduce weightage too. So become 20,20 30,30. Easier to calculate.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S Offline
                        sleepy
                        last edited by

                        shine:
                        sleepy:

                        Say hypothetically weightage is lowered to 20%

                        Don't think it can be 20%. It'll be difficult to divide the remaining 80% into 3 equally for the other 3 subjects. More likely 22% or 19%. If not, then one other subject need to reduce weightage too. So become 20,20 30,30. Easier to calculate.

                        Regardless of 22% or 19%, it is still a substantial %

                        Unless it is reduced to some negligible % (unlikely) I don't think it's wise to pay lesser attention to Chinese subject

                        My strategy remains the same - garner any marks within reach 😄

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 65
                        • 66
                        • 67
                        • 68
                        • 69
                        • 103
                        • 104
                        • 67 / 104
                        • First post
                          Last post



                        Online Users

                        Statistics

                        3

                        Online

                        210.8k

                        Users

                        34.3k

                        Topics

                        1.8m

                        Posts
                        Popular Topics
                        New to the KiasuParents forum? Tips and Tricks!
                        Choosing and Evaluating Primary Schools
                        DSA 2026
                        PSLE Discussions and Strategies
                        How much do you spend on the kids' tuition/enrichments?
                        SkillsFuture + anything related to upskilling/learning something new!

                          About Us Contact Us forum Terms of Service Privacy Policy