* Eunoia JC (EJC)
-
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900859\" time=\"1551598661\" user_id=\"153793:
NJC median UAS is 84.4 and someone mentioned earlier in the A level thread, historically, median UAS can be anything 1-3 points higher than mean UAS.
eg NJC- NJC RP cant be lowered from 84.4 to below 82.4 mah.
So why can’t be lowered from 84.4 to 82.4? Because your mouth said can’t means can’t? Prove it with data.
I do not want to speculate on what is the mean UAS of NJC because I don’t have the exact figure. -
H2 Econs 48.x % is not too bad for a start. I was expecting 20% only.
I guess one needs to go back to COP of this Class to check the medians. DHS and RV’s highest tscore was over 270 back then. They hadn’t accepted any JAE students yet.
Like it or not (again you don’t have to agree with me), there’s some diff in capability between a 6-pointer versus a 10-pointer. A 10-pointer may have one B3 or B4 in his L1R5, and if that B4 happens to be his EL or Humanities, this candidate’s A level Humanities and GP will not be, erhm you know, …
Of course for 6-7-pointer, his EL and Humanities should be very strong at A1 or A2, so chances of him scoring well in his GP and contrasting Humanities subject (be it H1 or H2) will likely be pretty high.
My school had some 10+ pointers who came in because of sports so they got some point deduction and managed to get into commerce or arts (lower COP). Their final A level output viz the bulk of the remaining 2-6 pointers was quite different. -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900866\" time=\"1551599911\" user_id=\"153793:
I see. Thanks. But that's 'relative' and judged from a grateful parent's perspective. If the parent thinks there's value-add, then there's value add.
Pg 73 , 1 parent said that \"I think EJC did very well\" and the more value added than other single digit JCs.obm\" post_id=\"1900856\" time=\"1551598032\" user_id=\"162988:
Therefore, your comment that 'EJC parents said' 'ALL subjects' were 'very good' is incorrect on 3 counts. No one is boasting here. Cheers.
Ong Ye Kung said if the student thinks his school is good, then that school is good. We've been advised to think the PAP way, so I'm not surprised that parent wrote what he did. -
I went back to read page 73.
Grandyma, ppl said “I think EJC did very well. With a mean UAS of 82.x, taking into account its COP was 10 previously, it is really value-adding compared to the other JCs whose COP was single digit”
I find nothing wrong with the statement. There is a condition attached because EJC took in JAE students with COP 10. You chose to selectively misrepresent that statement and mislead others. Why did you choose to twist the story in your favor? Talking about misleading the public!
As an analogy, I can say that I think my daughter’s primary school did “very well” in nurturing her. The equivalent is you choosing to twist the story into saying, wa, are you saying your daughter primary school is number one ah? -
obm\" post_id=\"1900874\" time=\"1551601206\" user_id=\"162988:
I see. Thanks. But that's 'relative' and judged from a grateful parent's perspective. If the parent thinks there's value-add, then there's value add.
Pg 73 , 1 parent said that \"I think EJC did very well\" and the more value added than other single digit JCs.Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900866\" time=\"1551599911\" user_id=\"153793:
[quote=obm post_id=1900856 time=1551598032 user_id=162988]Therefore, your comment that 'EJC parents said' 'ALL subjects' were 'very good' is incorrect on 3 counts. No one is boasting here. Cheers.
Ong Ye Kung said if the student thinks his school is good, then that school is good. We've been advised to think the PAP way, so I'm not surprised that parent wrote what he did.[/quote]Alright. Thank you you too. -
lee_yl\" post_id=\"1900879\" time=\"1551601779\" user_id=\"17023:
People who read first statement: its telling us that other JCs with single digit COP didnt value add as much when Compared to EJC.
I went back to read page 73.
Grandyma, ppl said “I think EJC did very well. With a mean UAS of 82.x, taking into account its COP was 10 previously, it is really value-adding compared to the other JCs whose COP was single digit”
I find nothing wrong with the statement. There is a condition attached because EJC took in JAE students with COP 10. You chose to selectively misrepresent that statement and mislead others. Why did you choose to twist the story in your favor? Talking about misleading the public!
As an analogy, I can say that I think my daughter’s primary school did “very well” in nurturing her. The equivalent is you choosing to twist the story into saying, wa, are you saying your daughter primary school is number one ah?
Isnt it what this statement mean?
Then you explain 'really value adding compared' mean what?
Unless I misinterpreted but i Didnt mislead the public bc I didnt say \"other single digit JCs really value added Compared to EJC\" such a statement.
From your last statement about \" your daughter Pri School....\" pls dont put words into my mouth...I will interpret and say \" your gal Pri Sch has done a good job\".
What num 1 school? -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900891\" time=\"1551605618\" user_id=\"153793:
What a twisted interpretation! Your logic is simply convoluted. That EJC parent’s simple statement centres on EJC but did not exclude or deny the value-add of other JCs but you, plain jealous that EJC can value-add, chose to interpret that statement in a selfish manner which nobody else thinks this way. The parent is only praising EJC and you must take it that she is insinuating about your granddaughter’s JC? Saying well about EJC doesn’t mean speaking ill of other JCs. Poked your sore point is it?
People who read first statement: its telling us that other JCs with single digit COP didnt value add as much when Compared to EJC.lee_yl\" post_id=\"1900879\" time=\"1551601779\" user_id=\"17023:
I went back to read page 73.
Grandyma, ppl said “I think EJC did very well. With a mean UAS of 82.x, taking into account its COP was 10 previously, it is really value-adding compared to the other JCs whose COP was single digit”
I find nothing wrong with the statement. There is a condition attached because EJC took in JAE students with COP 10. You chose to selectively misrepresent that statement and mislead others. Why did you choose to twist the story in your favor? Talking about misleading the public!
As an analogy, I can say that I think my daughter’s primary school did “very well” in nurturing her. The equivalent is you choosing to twist the story into saying, wa, are you saying your daughter primary school is number one ah?
Isnt it what this statement mean?
Then you explain 'really value adding compared' mean what?
Unless I misinterpreted but i Didnt mislead the public bc I didnt say \"other single digit JCs really value added Compared to EJC\" such a statement.
From your last statement about \" your daughter Pri School....\" pls dont put words into my mouth...I will interpret and say \" your gal Pri Sch has done a good job\".
What num 1 school?
Stuff words in your mouth? You don’t know what an analogy mean? People mentioned “very well” only, you quickly and selectively dish out academic data of other schools to prove otherwise. No?
You twist and turn until as if EJC parents are claiming EJ to be number 3 (after RI/HCI). If I didn’t go back to re-read page 73, I wouldn’t have known how you actually chop off the other half of ppl’s statement. Given your Ah Ma age, I wonder if you were one of those 红卫兵，so adept at 断章取义。 -
lee_yl\" post_id=\"1900900\" time=\"1551608864\" user_id=\"17023:
What a twisted interpretation! Your logic is simply convoluted. That EJC parent’s simple statement centres on EJC but did not exclude or deny the value-add of other JCs but you, plain jealous that EJC can value-add, chose to interpret that statement in a selfish manner which nobody else thinks this way. The parent is only praising EJC and you must take it that she is insinuating about your granddaughter’s JC? Saying well about EJC doesn’t mean speaking ill of other JCs. Poked your sore point is it?
People who read first statement: its telling us that other JCs with single digit COP didnt value add as much when Compared to EJC.Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900891\" time=\"1551605618\" user_id=\"153793:
[quote=lee_yl post_id=1900879 time=1551601779 user_id=17023]I went back to read page 73.
Grandyma, ppl said “I think EJC did very well. With a mean UAS of 82.x, taking into account its COP was 10 previously, it is really value-adding compared to the other JCs whose COP was single digit”
I find nothing wrong with the statement. There is a condition attached because EJC took in JAE students with COP 10. You chose to selectively misrepresent that statement and mislead others. Why did you choose to twist the story in your favor? Talking about misleading the public!
As an analogy, I can say that I think my daughter’s primary school did “very well” in nurturing her. The equivalent is you choosing to twist the story into saying, wa, are you saying your daughter primary school is number one ah?
Isnt it what this statement mean?
Then you explain 'really value adding compared' mean what?
Unless I misinterpreted but i Didnt mislead the public bc I didnt say \"other single digit JCs really value added Compared to EJC\" such a statement.
From your last statement about \" your daughter Pri School....\" pls dont put words into my mouth...I will interpret and say \" your gal Pri Sch has done a good job\".
What num 1 school?
Stuff words in your mouth? You don’t know what an analogy mean? People mentioned “very well” only, you quickly and selectively dish out academic data of other schools to prove otherwise. No?
You twist and turn until as if EJC parents are claiming EJ to be number 3 (after RI/HCI). If I didn’t go back to re-read page 73, I wouldn’t have known how you actually chop off the other half of ppl’s statement. Given your Ah Ma age, I wonder if you were one of those 红卫兵，so adept at 断章取义。[/quote]Chill lah...
Already told you to read statement 'that used word 'Compared'.
I didnt chop off any half statement.
If you dk, then its ok.
Chill lah...EJC still did well but again not until it \" really value add compared to single digit JCs\"
Peace. -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900863\" time=\"1551599299\" user_id=\"153793:
But you are the one that say school with IP kids must do better lei.
Like that ah...but we dont separate IP schools , semi IP and non IP schools.Grandypa\" post_id=\"1900853\" time=\"1551596833\" user_id=\"154562:
RV, DHS? Not fair lei. 100% IP kids. I thought you always said got IP kids must do v good ?
EJC only 75% IP kids. Can compare like this ah. You quite biased
Then how?
RV and DHS has 100% IP kids definitely will do much better. So how can that prove they are better in Econs than EJC? :siao: -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900868\" time=\"1551600290\" user_id=\"153793:
Wah...try to backtrack now.....
Chill lah...see that you upset..
Did i say other JCs all subjects did better than EJC?
I did praise EJC did well and some subjects scored well.
My point is 1 parent or some said EJC value added more than other single digit JCs which not true as it has subj eg Econ,CSC didnt fare that well.
On page 75 you said \"EJC results didnt do better than the rest of the top tier JCs lei...\"
So when you say results, you are ONLY talking about Econs??
If you are only talking about Econs, than why say resultSs? You could just say Econs unless you are just trying to mislead by telling a half-truth to taint EJC which proves once again you are a consummate liar.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login