* Eunoia JC (EJC)
-
obm\" post_id=\"1900989\" time=\"1551669708\" user_id=\"162988:
Thank you all for answering my question.
It is likely to be left skewed distribution or negative skew for NJC, based on that pathetic bit of info provided by the school. There were 35% H2As and the Math & Science depts did pretty well according to one table compiled by a member in the Alevel 2018 megathread.
NJC's '1 in 2 scored As for H3' cannot be counted as it's not part of UAS. I hazard a guess its Mode is on the right side. But as to how flat the curve is, we need its full set of data to determine how big the margin is between its Mean and Median. For negative skews, the Median is higher than Mean, hence the preference by its Principal to present the Median.
https://postimg.cc/dkvrbBmH
So its right to say Mean can be higher or lower than Median.
Regard to NJC Mean, yes fair enough to say its Mean likely negative skewed as Principal didnt share much abt its cohort scores.
How about NYJC?
Principal shared \"More than 5 out of 10 in you got more than 85 pt\".
So can say its Median is slightly > 85.X?
Skewed towards? -
Grandyma:
Be careful, with above vague, ambiguous statement, because Principal of Nanyang Junior College did not state explicitly nor clearly, what exactly is this \"more than 5 out of 10 in you ? This \" in you\" being refered to, actually constitute what ? P of NYJC didn't define explicitly, is it
How about NYJC?
Principal shared \"More than 5 out of 10 in you scored More than 85 points\".
A) more than 5 out of 10, who had taken all H2 subjects, or
B) more than 5 out of 10, who had taken all H1 subjects, or
C) more than 5 out of 10, who had taken either H1 or H2 subjects ?
As you know, playing of words around, do have an impact, on the hearers.
For example
The meaning of
\"5 out of 10 in you, who had ALL taken H2 subjects\"
Is very different, from say,
\"5 out of 10 in you : out of which 4 had taken H1 subjects, while one taking H2 subject\"
See the impact (difference), after you read ? -
phtthp\" post_id=\"1901035\" time=\"1551680107\" user_id=\"35251:
Be careful, with above vague, ambiguous statement, because Principal of Nanyang Junior College did not state explicitly nor clearly, what exactly is this \"more than 5 out of 10 in you. This \" in you\" refering to, P of NYJC didn't define explicitly, is itHow about NYJC?
Principal shared \"More than 5 out of 10 in you scored More than 85 points\".
A) more than 5 out of 10, who had taken all H2 subjects, or
B) more than 5 out of 10, who had taken all H1 subjects, or
C) more than 5 out of 10, who had taken either H1 or H2 subjects ?[/quote]Ah..if he was addressing the cohort, it refers to the whole cohort mah.
Just like other JCs put up slides in front of cohort eg 7 in 10 got A in H2 Chem- this 10 refers to all taking this H2 Chem.
To get 85 pts above, that is to add up all RP ( 3 H2 + H1+GP+PW). Otherwise how to get 85pt if just add only H2 or H1 subjects? -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1901033\" time=\"1551679512\" user_id=\"153793:
If you take principal's comment at face value, median > 85 (however, we also know 5 in 10 could also mean 45%
Thank you all for answering my question.
So its right to say Mean can be higher or lower than Median.
Regard to NJC Mean, yes fair enough to say its Mean likely negative skewed as Principal didnt share much abt its cohort scores.
How about NYJC?
Principal shared \"More than 5 out of 10 in you got more than 85 pt\".
So can say its Median is slightly > 85.X?
Skewed towards?
).
If 50% of the students score between 85 and 90, an equal amount would have to score between 80 and 85 to have mean = median, or a better ratio for mean > median, which are very unlikely to be the case. Chances are, there will be a handful scoring in the 70s or lower. Hence, NYJC mean should also be in the low 80s. How low? Insufficient data to know. -
Err…rvhs had mean UAS 83.75rp with 57% scoring 85-90rp. Gp, one of the hardest subject to score, was closed to 40%dist for rv. Rv also had mean bcme/pcme h2 subject distinction rate of >50% or if not in 60% range. Even that, their mean UAS is not >85. For hci n ri, mean UAS is just ~ 85. If a non ipjc is able to produce mean UAS of >85 to become the no.1 jc in Singapore, then the implication is very big. I SERIOUSLY think moe needs to adjust on the direction in grooming students in ipjc to be very fair to jae students to reduce the inequality of resources allocation and special programs opportunities.
-
thsheng99\" post_id=\"1900543\" time=\"1551425407\" user_id=\"37400:
Given that there are 25 %JAE, and if the 75% of the IP kids really performed above-expectation (say >=85 UAS), I can conclude that the JAE kids would have performed below expectation for the mean UAS to be 82.4.
Are you saying the rest of the IP JCs have no IP kids? Furthermore, there is still a substantial 25% that came in through JAE in EJC. Please look at the COP at 2017Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900412\" time=\"1551397436\" user_id=\"153793:
EJC value adding...you mean with 75% IP kids in this 2018 A level cohort ( its P6 intake that yr i think was COP 252-257 and higher) , you didnt expect this cohort to churn out Mean RP of 82.4 results regardless its pioneer batch or not. From info shared, RP 82.4 is not better than some other JCs.
Which single digit JCs are you refering that they didnt produce the so called ' value adding' results and that EJC has more 'value added' results??
Junior College\tArts\tScience / IB
Raffles Institution, RI\t4\t4
Hwa Chong Institution, HCI\t4\t4
Victoria Junior College, VJC\t7\t5
Anglo-Chinese School (Independent), ACSi\t–\t5
National Junior College, NJC\t7\t6
Nanyang Junior College, NYJC\t7\t6
Anglo-Chinese Junior College, ACJC\t8\t7
St. Joseph’s Institution, SJI\t–\t7
Eunoia Junior College, EJC\t9\t9
There are at least 8 schools with better COP than EJC. With a UAS of 82.4 is close to or similar to the likes of NJC and VJC ( who has COP of 5-7)
Furthermore, given that it is a pioneer year ( with no proven record) with presumably many teething problems and that it is operating from a temporary campus in remote Mt Sinai where transportation links are not that good, would you not think that they have been \"value-adding\"?
You are just being over-critical. I am glad that my grandma is more reasonable -
floppy\" post_id=\"1901081\" time=\"1551693609\" user_id=\"97579:
Mean must be = Median?
If you take principal's comment at face value, median > 85 (however, we also know 5 in 10 could also mean 45%Grandyma\" post_id=\"1901033\" time=\"1551679512\" user_id=\"153793:
Thank you all for answering my question.
So its right to say Mean can be higher or lower than Median.
Regard to NJC Mean, yes fair enough to say its Mean likely negative skewed as Principal didnt share much abt its cohort scores.
How about NYJC?
Principal shared \"More than 5 out of 10 in you got more than 85 pt\".
So can say its Median is slightly > 85.X?
Skewed towards? ).
If 50% of the students score between 85 and 90, an equal amount would have to score between 80 and 85 to have mean = median, or a better ratio for mean > median, which are very unlikely to be the case. Chances are, there will be a handful scoring in the 70s or lower. Hence, NYJC mean should also be in the low 80s. How low? Insufficient data to know.
Principal said ' MORE than 5 in 10' not 5 in 10
Dont understand yr login....hahaa but thanks. -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1901033\" time=\"1551679512\" user_id=\"153793:
Seen no response for the question I posted.
Thank you all for answering my question.obm\" post_id=\"1900989\" time=\"1551669708\" user_id=\"162988:
It is likely to be left skewed distribution or negative skew for NJC, based on that pathetic bit of info provided by the school. There were 35% H2As and the Math & Science depts did pretty well according to one table compiled by a member in the Alevel 2018 megathread.
NJC's '1 in 2 scored As for H3' cannot be counted as it's not part of UAS. I hazard a guess its Mode is on the right side. But as to how flat the curve is, we need its full set of data to determine how big the margin is between its Mean and Median. For negative skews, the Median is higher than Mean, hence the preference by its Principal to present the Median.
https://postimg.cc/dkvrbBmH
So its right to say Mean can be higher or lower than Median.
Regard to NJC Mean, yes fair enough to say its Mean likely negative skewed as Principal didnt share much abt its cohort scores.
How about NYJC?
Principal shared \"More than 5 out of 10 in you got more than 85 pt\".
So can say its Median is slightly > 85.X?
Skewed towards?
Its ok I have gotten the answer. -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1901151\" time=\"1551748738\" user_id=\"153793:
Mean must be = Median?
If you take principal's comment at face value, median > 85 (however, we also know 5 in 10 could also mean 45%floppy\" post_id=\"1901081\" time=\"1551693609\" user_id=\"97579:
[quote=Grandyma post_id=1901033 time=1551679512 user_id=153793]Thank you all for answering my question.
So its right to say Mean can be higher or lower than Median.
Regard to NJC Mean, yes fair enough to say its Mean likely negative skewed as Principal didnt share much abt its cohort scores.
How about NYJC?
Principal shared \"More than 5 out of 10 in you got more than 85 pt\".
So can say its Median is slightly > 85.X?
Skewed towards? ).
If 50% of the students score between 85 and 90, an equal amount would have to score between 80 and 85 to have mean = median, or a better ratio for mean > median, which are very unlikely to be the case. Chances are, there will be a handful scoring in the 70s or lower. Hence, NYJC mean should also be in the low 80s. How low? Insufficient data to know.
Principal said ' MORE than 5 in 10' not 5 in 10
Dont understand yr login....hahaa but thanks.[/quote]If you don’t understand, I cannot help you. As lee_yl says, it’s statistics 101. I understand a crash course in statistics can be overwhelming for some elderly folks. Perhaps your grandchild who has gotten an A in Maths (I hope) has a better way of explaining to you (I hope again). -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1901151\" time=\"1551748738\" user_id=\"153793:
Mean must be = Median?
If you take principal's comment at face value, median > 85 (however, we also know 5 in 10 could also mean 45%floppy\" post_id=\"1901081\" time=\"1551693609\" user_id=\"97579:
[quote=Grandyma post_id=1901033 time=1551679512 user_id=153793]Thank you all for answering my question.
So its right to say Mean can be higher or lower than Median.
Regard to NJC Mean, yes fair enough to say its Mean likely negative skewed as Principal didnt share much abt its cohort scores.
How about NYJC?
Principal shared \"More than 5 out of 10 in you got more than 85 pt\".
So can say its Median is slightly > 85.X?
Skewed towards? ).
If 50% of the students score between 85 and 90, an equal amount would have to score between 80 and 85 to have mean = median, or a better ratio for mean > median, which are very unlikely to be the case. Chances are, there will be a handful scoring in the 70s or lower. Hence, NYJC mean should also be in the low 80s. How low? Insufficient data to know.
Principal said ' MORE than 5 in 10' not 5 in 10
Dont understand yr login...out of context....hahaa...its ok...but thanks.[/quote]
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login