* Eunoia JC (EJC)

[Grandyma]

obm\" post_id=\"1901598\" time=\"1551887474\" user_id=\"162988:

Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900792\" time=\"1551576430\" user_id=\"153793:

If EJC can work on its Sciences more and CSC , with its IP students calibre, Im sure it will do \"very well\".
Ah, it did very well for Arts -80% A.

Thanks for letting me know. Indeed, amid all the petty squabblings, we have overlooked an important achievement shared by Ah Ma---EJC's 80% distinctions for Arts/Humanities. It is indeed commendable.

:congrats:

Sorry, wasnt clear enough. I meant the subject, Art. Not the Humanities subject.

[snowyqueen]

[/quote]

Sorry, wasnt clear enough. I meant the subject, Art. Not the Humanities subject.
[/quote]
For Humanities it also did very well if you know the statistics as you claimed. The main core humanities subject like Lit is >75% dist so 8 out of 10 score distinction (as some P like to use this kind of data presentation). For hist, it has the best achievement with >70% dist, is on par and if not better than ri. For geog, it is > 50% dist but this result is only second to ri as compared with other ipjc. For hci, no way to include them in the comparison as i do not hv their data for humanities. So no need to selectively picked on a particular subject to comment. So i hope we are all clear now. I seriously think its meaningless to compare in this way but i also feel you are doing ejc a diservice by highlighting on their weaker dist rate subject and disregard on their strong subjects. So i need to make sure the whole picture on ejc is correct.

[floppy]

snowyqueen\" post_id=\"1901610\" time=\"1551915467\" user_id=\"1510:

...
I seriously think its meaningless to compare in this way but i also feel you are doing ejc a diservice by highlighting on their weaker dist rate subject and disregard on their strong subjects. So i need to make sure the whole picture on ejc is correct.

:udawoman:

[lee_yl]

mindays\" post_id=\"1901586\" time=\"1551882378\" user_id=\"140018:

lee_yl\" post_id=\"1901567\" time=\"1551878297\" user_id=\"17023:

[quote=mindays post_id=1901562 time=1551877516 user_id=140018]

What is your intention when you said \"just use Grandyma all the way lah\"? Obviously kicking a bucket of water and saying why is the water spilled :evil:

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it can go by any other name but it is still a duck.

That is pure over generalisation and I hope not all EJC parents(?) are like you. Might as well say a goose is Donald Duck, waterfowl is Donald Duck, or even mihirungs. Unless you prove it is a duck, you should refrain from insisting it is a duck.[/quote]Sigh. Your over the top response is telling, really a case of 此地无银三百两

[Grandyma]

snowyqueen\" post_id=\"1901610\" time=\"1551915467\" user_id=\"1510:

For Humanities it also did very well if you know the statistics as you claimed. The main core humanities subject like Lit is >75% dist so 8 out of 10 score distinction (as some P like to use this kind of data presentation). For hist, it has the best achievement with >70% dist, is on par and if not better than ri. For geog, it is > 50% dist but this result is only second to ri as compared with other ipjc. For hci, no way to include them in the comparison as i do not hv their data for humanities. So no need to selectively picked on a particular subject to comment. So i hope we are all clear now. I seriously think its meaningless to compare in this way but i also feel you are doing ejc a diservice by highlighting on their weaker dist rate subject and disregard on their strong subjects. So i need to make sure the whole picture on ejc is correct.

I did mention in my much earlier post on 2/3 that Humanities did well but hv to work on Econ plus other subjects...
Looking at its RP, it students population is quite widely varied and prone towards to left.

[stetan]

Grandyma\" post_id=\"1901581\" time=\"1551881467\" user_id=\"153793:

There are actresses who act well, persevere and eventually get recognise. They dont need to be top tier but are A List actresses.

Errr..., to be in A List is Top tier unless you are telling me there is a A* List?

[stetan]

mindays\" post_id=\"1901585\" time=\"1551882087\" user_id=\"140018:

So you can't answer my question(s)? That is why you choose to go back to the old books when we have already closed the chapter. Let's call a spade a spade

I repeat again. These questions have been extensively discussed in the NYJC thread 2 years ago where you insisted that NYJC is a top JC having results that is better than DHS, VJC e.t.c.

Did you not you recall that you had utterly lost that argument, or have you already erased those painfu experiences from your memories ?

[stetan]

mindays\" post_id=\"1901588\" time=\"1551882706\" user_id=\"140018:

Sardonic remark just shows how incapable and insinuating EJC parents are. Shameful :siam:

Sorry. I am not a EJC parent but you have just slam all EJC parents out there

[stetan]

snowyqueen\" post_id=\"1901610\" time=\"1551915467\" user_id=\"1510:

For Humanities it also did very well if you know the statistics as you claimed. The main core humanities subject like Lit is >75% dist so 8 out of 10 score distinction (as some P like to use this kind of data presentation). For hist, it has the best achievement with >70% dist, is on par and if not better than ri. For geog, it is > 50% dist but this result is only second to ri as compared with other ipjc. For hci, no way to include them in the comparison as i do not hv their data for humanities. So no need to selectively picked on a particular subject to comment. So i hope we are all clear now. I seriously think its meaningless to compare in this way but i also feel you are doing ejc a diservice by highlighting on their weaker dist rate subject and disregard on their strong subjects. So i need to make sure the whole picture on ejc is correct.

Thank you for giving the balanced perspective. It's indeed great performance for EJC's virgin A Levels.

[snowyqueen]

Grandyma\" post_id=\"1901619\" time=\"1551919536\" user_id=\"153793:

I did mention in my much earlier post on 2/3 that Humanities did well but hv to work on Econ plus other subjects...
Looking at its RP, it students population is quite widely varied and prone towards to left.

Different jc has different focus and programs to cater to their students. All has strength and weakness. I am sure the relevent dept will work towards their goal but i do not think ejc wants or need to be the top jc to be good in everything. The school is focus on developing the students and as long as the students enjoys their jcs life, we no need to worry abt their distinction rate. Their tutors said they will do well if they are bonded and so they are working hard on bonding, creating condusive environment for students to develop their strength. I want to mention abt David Hoe again in their econs dept, he was mentioned by Mr. NG in Parliament recently. As long as they have such delicated teachers to know how to inspire the students and build resilency, results will come naturally.