* Nanyang JC (NYJC)

[winsomelosesomee]

lee_yl\" post_id=\"1964540\" time=\"1582451589\" user_id=\"17023:

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964531\" time=\"1582449002\" user_id=\"183607:

[quote=Grandypa post_id=1964514 time=1582438621 user_id=154562]Why never reveal UAS? Not good?

Fyi, Nyjc never shares its UAS all these while , in case u dk, even with gd results.
In Conference Vid to 2018 cohort, he announced result was excellent showing.
Thats gd.

I see. So it’s true that NYJC NEVER shares its UAS all these while.

I recall recently when I asked, “Wow, NYJC UAS is 85? Higher than RI?” Some NYJC supporter ask me don’t gey gey lah, how can I not know that!

So all these while, the alleged NYJC’s UAS 85 in 2019 is just 往自己脸上贴金？[/quote]I dk who u PR with recently.
It was shared > 50% got > 85 RP which was true.
So Median > 85 for 2018 results.
This Median you alrdy kn so dont bring up.
Move on.

[winsomelosesomee]

Grandypa\" post_id=\"1964562\" time=\"1582466433\" user_id=\"154562:

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964531\" time=\"1582449002\" user_id=\"183607:

[quote=Grandypa post_id=1964514 time=1582438621 user_id=154562]Why never reveal UAS? Not good?

Fyi, Nyjc never shares its UAS all these while , in case u dk, even with gd results.
In Conference Vid to 2018 cohort, he announced result was excellent showing.
Thats gd.

So last year the median UAS of 80+ is fake ?[/quote]Median > 85 rp, you kn as last yr was shared.
U can find its u tube vid for 2018 result thr internet . Or u saw the vid liao, still bring up.
Move on.

2019 results, alrdy shared in vid.

[Parent]

lee_yl\" post_id=\"1964540\" time=\"1582451589\" user_id=\"17023:

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964531\" time=\"1582449002\" user_id=\"183607:

[quote=Grandypa post_id=1964514 time=1582438621 user_id=154562]Why never reveal UAS? Not good?

Fyi, Nyjc never shares its UAS all these while , in case u dk, even with gd results.
In Conference Vid to 2018 cohort, he announced result was excellent showing.
Thats gd.

I see. So it’s true that NYJC NEVER shares its UAS all these while.

I recall recently when I asked, “Wow, NYJC UAS is 85? Higher than RI?” Some NYJC supporter ask me don’t gey gey lah, how can I not know that!

So all these while, the alleged NYJC’s UAS 85 in 2019 is just 往自己脸上贴金？[/quote]I doubt 85 is UAS Mean. Probably Median.

[lee_yl]

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964566\" time=\"1582471620\" user_id=\"183607:

lee_yl\" post_id=\"1964540\" time=\"1582451589\" user_id=\"17023:

[quote=winsomelosesomee post_id=1964531 time=1582449002 user_id=183607]

Fyi, Nyjc never shares its UAS all these while , in case u dk, even with gd results.
In Conference Vid to 2018 cohort, he announced result was excellent showing.
Thats gd.

I see. So it’s true that NYJC NEVER shares its UAS all these while.

I recall recently when I asked, “Wow, NYJC UAS is 85? Higher than RI?” Some NYJC supporter ask me don’t gey gey lah, how can I not know that!

So all these while, the alleged NYJC’s UAS 85 in 2019 is just 往自己脸上贴金？

I dk who u PR with recently.
It was shared > 50% got > 85 RP which was true.
So Median > 85 for 2018 results.
This Median you alrdy kn so dont bring up.
Move on.[/quote]PR with Winsomelosesome. Not sure if you know him/her.

NYJC never shares mean/median UAS all these while. So last year’s UAS 85 was you ownself concocted and not officially announced. As a Singlish Beng would say, 自己讲，自己爽

[winsomelosesomee]

Parent\" post_id=\"1964584\" time=\"1582509861\" user_id=\"2348:

lee_yl\" post_id=\"1964540\" time=\"1582451589\" user_id=\"17023:

[quote=winsomelosesomee post_id=1964531 time=1582449002 user_id=183607]

Fyi, Nyjc never shares its UAS all these while , in case u dk, even with gd results.
In Conference Vid to 2018 cohort, he announced result was excellent showing.
Thats gd.

I see. So it’s true that NYJC NEVER shares its UAS all these while.

I recall recently when I asked, “Wow, NYJC UAS is 85? Higher than RI?” Some NYJC supporter ask me don’t gey gey lah, how can I not know that!

So all these while, the alleged NYJC’s UAS 85 in 2019 is just 往自己脸上贴金？

I doubt 85 is UAS Mean. Probably Median.[/quote]Yup.
They know its Median > 85 rp, as shared by Ny Head last yr.
Thats why i dk why they still brought this up. :scratchhead:
But nevermind them.

[Grandypa]

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964567\" time=\"1582472019\" user_id=\"183607:

Grandypa\" post_id=\"1964562\" time=\"1582466433\" user_id=\"154562:

[quote=winsomelosesomee post_id=1964531 time=1582449002 user_id=183607]

Fyi, Nyjc never shares its UAS all these while , in case u dk, even with gd results.
In Conference Vid to 2018 cohort, he announced result was excellent showing.
Thats gd.

So last year the median UAS of 80+ is fake ?

Median > 85 rp, you kn as last yr was shared.
U can find its u tube vid for 2018 result thr internet . Or u saw the vid liao, still bring up.
Move on.

2019 results, alrdy shared in vid.[/quote]But u said NYJC never share UAS? So you are wrong?

So NYJC share UAS when it is good and dont share when it is bad?

[winsomelosesomee]

Grandypa\" post_id=\"1964592\" time=\"1582511556\" user_id=\"154562:

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964567\" time=\"1582472019\" user_id=\"183607:

[quote=Grandypa post_id=1964562 time=1582466433 user_id=154562]

So last year the median UAS of 80+ is fake ?

Median > 85 rp, you kn as last yr was shared.
U can find its u tube vid for 2018 result thr internet . Or u saw the vid liao, still bring up.
Move on.

2019 results, alrdy shared in vid.

But u said NYJC never share UAS? So you are wrong?

So NYJC share UAS when it is good and dont share when it is bad?[/quote]I meant Mean UAS not shared by Ny.
1 forummer might hve gotten from insider news abt its Mean though.
U know Median was > 85 last yr, so u know its Median I was referring.

I dun wish to continue with u.

As long Ny Head aldry shared class 2019 excellent showing results, then :xedfingers:
If you think not, so be it.

[lee_yl]

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964595\" time=\"1582512342\" user_id=\"183607:

Grandypa\" post_id=\"1964592\" time=\"1582511556\" user_id=\"154562:

[quote=winsomelosesomee post_id=1964567 time=1582472019 user_id=183607]

Median > 85 rp, you kn as last yr was shared.
U can find its u tube vid for 2018 result thr internet . Or u saw the vid liao, still bring up.
Move on.

2019 results, alrdy shared in vid.

But u said NYJC never share UAS? So you are wrong?

So NYJC share UAS when it is good and dont share when it is bad?

I meant Mean UAS not shared by Ny.
1 forummer might hve gotten from insider news abt its Mean though.
U know Median was > 85 last yr, so u know its Median I was referring.

I dun wish to continue with u.

As long Ny Head aldry shared class 2019 excellent showing results, then :xedfingers:
If you think not, so be it.[/quote]Who was that 1 forummer who might have gotten insider news? Winsomelosesome?

[stetan]

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964465\" time=\"1582363913\" user_id=\"183607:

Ny excellent showing 2019 A level results:
1) 4 in 10 attained at least 3 H2 distinctions,

2) 1 in 4 attained distinctions in all h2 Subjects,

3) more than 50% Student Leaders got > 85 rp.

https://youtu.be/vz5W0DKHgY8

How can you conclude it is \"excellent\" when the cohort performance - UAS is not even revealed ??

Many JCs such as RI and EJC has revealed theirs.

[Grandypa]

winsomelosesomee\" post_id=\"1964595\" time=\"1582512342\" user_id=\"183607:

Grandypa\" post_id=\"1964592\" time=\"1582511556\" user_id=\"154562:

[quote=winsomelosesomee post_id=1964567 time=1582472019 user_id=183607]

Median > 85 rp, you kn as last yr was shared.
U can find its u tube vid for 2018 result thr internet . Or u saw the vid liao, still bring up.
Move on.

2019 results, alrdy shared in vid.

But u said NYJC never share UAS? So you are wrong?

So NYJC share UAS when it is good and dont share when it is bad?

I meant Mean UAS not shared by Ny.
1 forummer might hve gotten from insider news abt its Mean though.
U know Median was > 85 last yr, so u know its Median I was referring.

I dun wish to continue with u.

As long Ny Head aldry shared class 2019 excellent showing results, then :xedfingers:
If you think not, so be it.[/quote]
Oh. So you saying even last year median of 85 was not official? It was some rumour from some forummer?

It may even be fake news