* Eunoia JC (EJC)
-
Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017927\" time=\"1616079700\" user_id=\"191857:
Hci obviously have 70% ip kids as shared.
Top 1 or 2 JCs must have more IP kids?lee_yl\" post_id=\"2017926\" time=\"1616078339\" user_id=\"17023:
[quote=Whyyhw post_id=2017923 time=1616076595 user_id=191857]
So moe has always wanted HCI/RI to be top 1 or 2 by having more ip kids?
Dhs and Rv have 80% ip kids inside but this time results plunged.
Moe also plan to maintain Ejc std by maintaining its 60% ip kids.
Are you insulting NYJC which has zero IP kids?
What is the point of your your question?
But then Dhs/Rv which have more ip , didnt do well.
Point is Moe controls num of ip kids cohort, thus hoping ip jcs can do well.
Hci and maybe RI will always be num 1, 2.
Ejc , still need to ascertain for a few years more, but its expected to do fairly ok as has more ip kids too.
The issue discussed is ip jcs only.
Out of context on jae jcs.
Generally ip jcs tend to outshine more with moe support except Dhs, Rv, Njc, Tjc.[/quote]You seem obsessed with the idea that DHS/RV didn’t do well. I think you should discuss this in the DHS or RV home thread, not here.
RI/HCI? Pls post your questions in the respective threads.
Earlier you even insinuated that EJC wants to maintain its standard so despite a large campus, it only accepts 40% JAE students. One parent here already pointed out that the students enrollment is controlled by MOE, not by the school! Please get your facts right and stop trying to hijack the thread here for your own selfish purposes.This is EJC home thread and it’s meant for EJC parents to network and share, not a platform for your obsessive rants! -
True to certain extend if w/out ip students, ip JCs wont able to sustain their A level stds.
Even Ejc latest results, if not for its big ip cohort, its jae results alone wont match top tier jcs.
My kakis Ejc jae divluge Ejc jae results average.
But ip commendable results helped pulled up overall results. -
gentlemaski\" post_id=\"2017974\" time=\"1616137626\" user_id=\"191959:
Your kakis got say “go Google” or not?
...
My kakis Ejc jae divluge Ejc jae results average.
But ip commendable results helped pulled up overall results.
:rotflmao: -
It’s callous to label JAE students (w/o offering any concrete proof but pure conjecture I must add) as 2nd class citizens in our IP JC.
Even in the top classes in RJC (e.g. those offering double RA), there were JAE students who qualified and IP students who didn’t. -
floppy\" post_id=\"2017978\" time=\"1616143321\" user_id=\"97579:
Ur joke kinda of Lame.
Your kakis got say “go Google” or not?gentlemaski\" post_id=\"2017974\" time=\"1616137626\" user_id=\"191959:
...
My kakis Ejc jae divluge Ejc jae results average.
But ip commendable results helped pulled up overall results.
:rotflmao: -
iRabbit\" post_id=\"2018011\" time=\"1616200250\" user_id=\"51587:
The school management of the JCs all know the results profile of their students - but this is not disclosed, even to the wider teacher group. I would say, unless you have heard from a JC principal/ VP/ school leader, none of us actually authoritatively know the difference in level of performance between JAEs and IP students within each school.
It's callous to label JAE students (w/o offering any concrete proof but pure conjecture I must add) as 2nd class citizens in our IP JC.
Even in the top classes in RJC (e.g. those offering double RA), there were JAE students who qualified and IP students who didn't.
What is a fact is that there is a very large degree of overlap and there will be many JAE students who outperform IP students, and vice versa. If the distinction was so clear cut and PSLE is such a definitive indicator of subsequent performance, then what is the point of JAE. I totally agree that in RI, HCI and all other IP JCs, the top classes will have a mix of JAE and IP students. -
doodbug\" post_id=\"2018081\" time=\"1616297283\" user_id=\"13281:
IP JCs ( EJC n a few JCs) that hv their feeder students from another sec schools prove to be more successful than JCs that hv sec level inside ( TJC, NJC, DHS, RV ). The latter stds are declining, latest being DHS.
The school management of the JCs all know the results profile of their students - but this is not disclosed, even to the wider teacher group. I would say, unless you have heard from a JC principal/ VP/ school leader, none of us actually authoritatively know the difference in level of performance between JAEs and IP students within each school.iRabbit\" post_id=\"2018011\" time=\"1616200250\" user_id=\"51587:
It's callous to label JAE students (w/o offering any concrete proof but pure conjecture I must add) as 2nd class citizens in our IP JC.
Even in the top classes in RJC (e.g. those offering double RA), there were JAE students who qualified and IP students who didn't.
What is a fact is that there is a very large degree of overlap and there will be many JAE students who outperform IP students, and vice versa. If the distinction was so clear cut and PSLE is such a definitive indicator of subsequent performance, then what is the point of JAE. I totally agree that in RI, HCI and all other IP JCs, the top classes will have a mix of JAE and IP students.
Ejc is lucky to hv 3 renowned sec schs as its feeder partner. With 60% IP cohort inside, expectation to do well is there.
Cant can go wrong rite. -
I certainly hope so as I have a child moving on to EJC!! But it doesn’t have a track record lor, so I just have to wait and see. And I also wonder if there is a difference being in an independent school, or not.
-
doodbug\" post_id=\"2018321\" time=\"1616556465\" user_id=\"13281:
No track record
I certainly hope so as I have a child moving on to EJC!! But it doesn't have a track record lor, so I just have to wait and see. And I also wonder if there is a difference being in an independent school, or not.
Why yr child isnt looking forward to Ejc?
Her IP cliques/ peers all thr train to Ejc, rite. -
She’s so comfortable in her Sec Sch and likes it so much she doesn’t look forward to having to move to a new school. My DD was not from the affiliated the primary school and entered the Sec Sch IP programme; her CCA also doesn’t have many O Level programme girls. Hence most of her friends are in the IP programme. In her case, she was considering the O Level programme strongly because she didn’t know which JC she would like to go to. However, after weighing it against having to sit for the O levels, she just decided she would rather forgo the O level exam instead hahahahah! She chose the Sec Sch not because of the IP-JC partner - at that time she and we knew nothing about EJC. Since then, we’ve had a couple of church friends who graduated from EJC - 1 O level and 1 IP - both enjoyed EJC.
Don’t need to say her - my son in an IP programme, also not looking forward to Year 5. Very happy with high school life.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login