lee_yl\" post_id=\"2018089\" time=\"1616303347\" user_id=\"17023:Do you know what you are talking about? And you are also underestimating JAE students due to your own obsessive bias.Perhaps moe should place IP students into mid tier JCs, monitor their performance.Kimm\" post_id=\"2018085\" time=\"1616301575\" user_id=\"191983:[quote=doodbug post_id=2018081 time=1616297283 user_id=13281]
The school management of the JCs all know the results profile of their students - but this is not disclosed, even to the wider teacher group. I would say, unless you have heard from a JC principal/ VP/ school leader, none of us actually authoritatively know the difference in level of performance between JAEs and IP students within each school.
What is a fact is that there is a very large degree of overlap and there will be many JAE students who outperform IP students, and vice versa. If the distinction was so clear cut and PSLE is such a definitive indicator of subsequent performance, then what is the point of JAE. I totally agree that in RI, HCI and all other IP JCs, the top classes will have a mix of JAE and IP students.
Im sure these JCs stds sure shoot up.
Maybe should inject IP students into NYJC. Else forever NYJC dares not disclose NYJC’s 4H2 performance. Or can help NYJC clinch a couple of PSC Scholarships?[/quote]Yes, should inject IP into NYJC mainly so can improve its std even more n to mid tier JCs. Gd idea.
Also, inject instead 80% IP students into EJC, you hoping?
So EJC can clinch PSC Scholarships to satisfy ur own obsessive bias.