Opinions of the Primary School Registration System

[verykiasu2010]

Pen88n:

I know there are some schools that practise that - limit the number of PVs for \"mutual benefits\". The school also prefers to give the PVs their priority as they have contributed to the school, and not create \"disappointment\". But then again, the next question of how PVs are chosen - how to ensure fairness then?

I also know of cases whereby PVs having chalked the hours but could not get the place. They were put on priority when vacancies arises during the school term. I've friends whose kids transferred to their school of choice once there were vacancies.

if parents are kiasu or better informed, they should have earlier on enquired with the target school when is the earliest enrollment time for PV and which types of duties are available, and go cheong for it. that would avoid lots of disappointment

if a parent knows the school is hot, they should expect the PV slots to be filled up fast too. MOE guideline is just guideline on PV time frame. if the school is hot then parents who are keen to do PV there should not wait till last minute to find out no more slot liao....and then come here and complain 'unfair', 'not transparent'....bla bla bla.....if they want it, go get it - EARLY. if they miss it - don't complain. blame their complacency, or blame their lack of resourcefulness.

and so it is reported that some schools PV slots have long waiting list. just like some kindy, waiting list starts a few months after child birth, perhaps even before end of confinement month.

for those schools that give out almost hundred or more PV slots a year, that is being plain irresponsible on the part of the school principal, when they can't fulfill it.

[dorisp]

THC:

Only fairness is entrance exam for Primary school, which might be possible down the road

I certainly hope not as it defeats the purpose of schools doing away with exams for P1 and P2 children. But then again, this method was used widely in HK where slots in hot schools were highly contested.

Will we follow HK's footsteps? Looking down the road, if there are more and more complaints about the unfairness of the PV selection system, the ministry or the school might just consider adopting this school extrance exam system for the 6 year old.............. :!:

[janet88]

dorisp:

THC:

Only fairness is entrance exam for Primary school, which might be possible down the road

I certainly hope not as it defeats the purpose of schools doing away with exams for P1 and P2 children. But then again, this method was used widely in HK where slots in hot schools were highly contested.

Will we follow HK's footsteps? Looking down the road, if there are more and more complaints about the unfairness of the PV selection system, the ministry or the school might just consider adopting this school extrance exam system for the 6 year old.............. :!:

Yes, HongKongers also buy houses near school of choice...no different from us. But we have done away with exams for P1/2. If MOE sets entrance exam, that is really contradicting what they have mentioned earlier. If parents are not happy with PV, I guess this whole thing would be removed one day...leaving Phase 2B with grassroots and church in that category.

[verykiasu2010]

janet_lee88:

Yes, HongKongers also buy houses near school of choice...no different from us. But we have done away with exams for P1/2. If MOE sets entrance exam, that is really contradicting what they have mentioned earlier. If parents are not happy with PV, I guess this whole thing would be removed one day...leaving Phase 2B with grassroots and church in that category.

not only in HK. it is also in Paris, London, Lyon, Sri Lanka, New York City, Shanghai, Beijing, Vienna, Budapest, etc - they all buy houses near to hot / popular schools. Nothing special about Singapore.

exams to enter popular primary school ? might as well introduce a national KLE - Kindergarten Leaving Exam - to rank the kids for placement in primary one. make it the same as PSLE for sec one placement. xiao liao.

[dorisp]

verykiasu2010:

not only in HK. it is also in Paris, London, Lyon, Sri Lanka, New York City, Shanghai, Beijing, Vienna, Budapest, etc - they all buy houses near to hot / popular schools. Nothing special about Singapore.


exams to enter popular primary school ? might as well introduce a national KLE - Kindergarten Leaving Exam - to rank the kids for placement in primary one. make it the same as PSLE for sec one placement. xiao liao.

:udawoman:

[janet88]

verykiasu2010:

not only in HK. it is also in Paris, London, Lyon, Sri Lanka, New York City, Shanghai, Beijing, Vienna, Budapest, etc - they all buy houses near to hot / popular schools. Nothing special about Singapore.


exams to enter popular primary school ? might as well introduce a national KLE - Kindergarten Leaving Exam - to rank the kids for placement in primary one. make it the same as PSLE for sec one placement. xiao liao.

You kidding me. No way man. Then I guarantee you people won't give birth.

[dorisp]

janet_lee88:

Yes, HongKongers also buy houses near school of choice...no different from us. But we have done away with exams for P1/2. If MOE sets entrance exam, that is really contradicting what they have mentioned earlier. If parents are not happy with PV, I guess this whole thing would be removed one day...leaving Phase 2B with grassroots and church in that category.

Instead of doing away with PV, there has been discussion here that the system could be improvised.

One of the main unhappiness arises from the selection process. The other is underutilising of time and skills of parents that are \"professionals\".

Possible ways to address the above could be:

1) tansparent selection such as balloting
2) Not sure if should segregate distance for balloting at this stage
3) once balloted, those \"professionals\" has the option to give up if they think the jobs assigned undermine their professionalism and hence give the opportunity to another parent on reserve list
4) to limit to small number of PV so they are assured of a slot during registration

For friendly discussion.

[qms]

dorisp:

:udawoman:

Errrr.....dorisp, verykiasu2010 is a daddy (unless he changed it over the CNY. :evil: :siam: ).

[janet88]

dorisp:

Instead of doing away with PV, there has been discussion here that the system could be improvised...

If professionals are chosen to be PVs, what 'jobs' would they want to take on that do not undermine their professional status ? Offer medical or legal advice to the school ?
Parents have written into ST to voice their unhappiness of PV to register their kids in the school. Selection of PVs is done by higher authority in the school. Is it possible to be transparent ?

[mummy168]

The whole Pri school registration sy begs review…

1.\tHome-school proximity…Is it logical for children living just next to sch not to secure a place under P2C and for another living at the other end of the island getting in under 2A?
2.\tPV…Seriousy how many PVs are blue collared workers? Do these parents not care for their children education? More likely they are working hard to feed the family, where to find time for PV?
Then wouldn’t the playing field for PV ony the professionals?
3.\tPopular schools …TUR till 2A already so high and 2B filled by kids with professional parents/assoc to clans. Where do this leave the kids with working class parents? Are they just condemn to study in neighbourhood schools? Does popular school then equate to elitist schools?