Club KSP Photography

[ZacK]

schweppes:

:thankyou: Zack.

Am looking for something that is less complicated and expensive than the DSLR but one that can take fast-action shots (sporting events?), panorama, far and near shots, etc....Thought I read somewhere that a hybrid camera has such functions.

Oh dear.... sounds like I want it all and must be affordable too. Haha... living up to my kiasuparent name

Not sure what is a \"cheap\" price to you... <$1000 or >$1000?

Anyway try to play around at dpreview... I like their camera side-by-side comparision... So that you can view the specs and compare them side-side

E.g. http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_ep3&products=nikon_d5100

[schweppes]

ZacK:

Not sure what is a \"cheap\" price to you... <$1000 or >$1000?

Anyway try to play around at dpreview... I like their camera side-by-side comparision... So that you can view the specs and compare them side-side

E.g. http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_ep3&products=nikon_d5100

aiyoh... definitely <$1,000. Otherwise... :moneyflies: :moneyflies:

Thanks Zack, for recommending the website. Had a quick peek and it looks very useful.

[Intermezzo]

Thanks ZacK ~


i'm trying to make a photo collection of quaint old buildings that i can find in Singapore.. but they are disappearing much too fast..

[ZacK]

schweppes:

ZacK:

Not sure what is a \"cheap\" price to you... <$1000 or >$1000?

Anyway try to play around at dpreview... I like their camera side-by-side comparision... So that you can view the specs and compare them side-side

E.g. http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_ep3&products=nikon_d5100

aiyoh... definitely <$1,000. Otherwise... :moneyflies: :moneyflies:

Thanks Zack, for recommending the website. Had a quick peek and it looks very useful.

Not sure if you can find mirrorless cam for <$1000... I read in some forum that E-P3 is retailing abt $1190 :oops:

[ZacK]

Intermezzo:

Thanks ZacK ~


i'm trying to make a photo collection of quaint old buildings that i can find in Singapore.. but they are disappearing much too fast..

Wow if you can build up this collection it will be very valuable in future... In that it is something that money will not be able to buy as these old buildings are making way for newer and modern designed architecture.

[cimman]

schweppes:

ZacK:

Not sure what is a \"cheap\" price to you... <$1000 or >$1000?

Anyway try to play around at dpreview... I like their camera side-by-side comparision... So that you can view the specs and compare them side-side

E.g. http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_ep3&products=nikon_d5100

aiyoh... definitely <$1,000. Otherwise... :moneyflies: :moneyflies:

Thanks Zack, for recommending the website. Had a quick peek and it looks very useful.

you can have the Olympus E-PL1 for slightly less than $498
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-iQDvAO6DOnk/Tltbex8hEvI/AAAAAAAAMAc/56qMfx7i4pc/s640/Olympus-COMEX-6pp-Brochure-25_2.jpg

it's available at Comex 2011, at Suntec from Sep 1- to Sep 4.
The Olympus E-PL1 is the first generation of Micro Four Thirds camera from Olympus.
The current version is E-PL3, which is $998
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-tHeXfZXNAhQ/TltbiAg4kdI/AAAAAAAAMAc/UWYAChjAJ5w/s640/Olympus-COMEX-6pp-Brochure-25.jpg

if you're just starting out, E-PL1 is good enough to play around with and get familiar with the system. It's weak point is in slow focusing. This is not an issue in most cases, except if you're planning on sports photography, or candids. Still a very good camera at that price point. Just remember to budget another $1500 for additional lens and batteries. So, don't spend too much on the body.

Or you can get a Sony NEX C3 for $1099
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-vHjDQi2OAUk/Tl4PvYQeSsI/AAAAAAAAL7Y/c7CaIXbOrUQ/s640/COMEX_Sony_Digital-Imaging-3.jpg

The Sony camer has a slightly bigger sensor than the Olympus and this gives you a better picture in low light situations. The down side of the Sony is that they don't have as many lenses to offer as the Olympus. The Sony also has in camera Panorama stitching, which means you can take Panoramic pictures easily by just pressing the shutter button and sweeping the camera around. The Olympus does not have this feature and you need to stitch the pics in a photo editor software. If I were to take a lot of Panoramic pics, I'll take the Sony NEX system anytime. A lot less hassle. The NEX lens are larger and heavier than the Olympus lens, not as light or portable as the Olympus.

They each have their pros and cons. You have to decide what kind of pics you would normally take. If you take a lot of pics indoors with available light, then the Sony camera would give you better quality. Take a trip to Suntec city and check out the cameras. Feel it in your hands and see which feels right. Best do it before the exhibition ends on 4 Sep.

[ZacK]

cimman:

schweppes:

[quote=\"ZacK\"]
Not sure what is a \"cheap\" price to you... <$1000 or >$1000?

Anyway try to play around at dpreview... I like their camera side-by-side comparision... So that you can view the specs and compare them side-side

E.g. http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_ep3&products=nikon_d5100

aiyoh... definitely <$1,000. Otherwise... :moneyflies: :moneyflies:

Thanks Zack, for recommending the website. Had a quick peek and it looks very useful.

you can have the Olympus E-PL1 for slightly less than $498
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-iQDvAO6DOnk/Tltbex8hEvI/AAAAAAAAMAc/56qMfx7i4pc/s640/Olympus-COMEX-6pp-Brochure-25_2.jpg

it's available at Comex 2011, at Suntec from Sep 1- to Sep 4.
The Olympus E-PL1 is the first generation of Micro Four Thirds camera from Olympus.
The current version is E-PL3, which is $998
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-tHeXfZXNAhQ/TltbiAg4kdI/AAAAAAAAMAc/UWYAChjAJ5w/s640/Olympus-COMEX-6pp-Brochure-25.jpg

if you're just starting out, E-PL1 is good enough to play around with and get familiar with the system. It's weak point is in slow focusing. This is not an issue in most cases, except if you're planning on sports photography, or candids. Still a very good camera at that price point. Just remember to budget another $1500 for additional lens and batteries. So, don't spend too much on the body.

Or you can get a Sony NEX C3 for $1099
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-vHjDQi2OAUk/Tl4PvYQeSsI/AAAAAAAAL7Y/c7CaIXbOrUQ/s640/COMEX_Sony_Digital-Imaging-3.jpg

The Sony camer has a slightly bigger sensor than the Olympus and this gives you a better picture in low light situations. The down side of the Sony is that they don't have as many lenses to offer as the Olympus. The Sony also has in camera Panorama stitching, which means you can take Panoramic pictures easily by just pressing the shutter button and sweeping the camera around. The Olympus does not have this feature and you need to stitch the pics in a photo editor software. If I were to take a lot of Panoramic pics, I'll take the Sony NEX system anytime. A lot less hassle. The NEX lens are larger and heavier than the Olympus lens, not as light or portable as the Olympus.

They each have their pros and cons. You have to decide what kind of pics you would normally take. If you take a lot of pics indoors with available light, then the Sony camera would give you better quality. Take a trip to Suntec city and check out the cameras. Feel it in your hands and see which feels right. Best do it before the exhibition ends on 4 Sep.[/quote]Thanks for the update and sharing

Anyway here is the side-side comparison for E-PL1 and Nex C3 for reference:
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_epl1&products=sony_nexc3

[Intermezzo]

Thanks for the great reviews from cimman and ZacK ~ i'm taking notes too kekeke..

as pointed out, the focusing of the olympus e-p1 is a little slow but it's still manageable as i do use it to take candids of my kids.. i don't use it for sports shots tho.

Need some advice here.. i'm thinking of getting a CPL filter for my E-P1. is it ok to keep the CPL on the camera all the time even when taking photos under light situations which actually do NOT need a CPL? thanks in advance ~

(ps. question arised because it seems very troublesome to have to remove / put on the CPL filter frequently.. wonder if i can just keep it on all the time as a kind of protective filter..? )

[Intermezzo]

http://i51.tinypic.com/21eyer5.jpg\">

share another pic of a pretty old Malay house that i like very much ~ :love:

[ZacK]

Intermezzo:

Thanks for the great reviews from cimman and ZacK ~ i'm taking notes too kekeke..

as pointed out, the focusing of the olympus e-p1 is a little slow but it's still manageable as i do use it to take candids of my kids.. i don't use it for sports shots tho.

Need some advice here.. i'm thinking of getting a CPL filter for my E-P1. is it ok to keep the CPL on the camera all the time even when taking photos under light situations which actually do NOT need a CPL? thanks in advance ~

(ps. question arised because it seems very troublesome to have to remove / put on the CPL filter frequently.. wonder if i can just keep it on all the time as a kind of protective filter..? )

Hiya Intermezzo... I have not used CPLs yet... But you may wish to check out this link on CPL Filters : http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/threads/803029-Newbie-Guide-to-Filters?p=6721873#post6721873

I believe the recommendation is to use CPL only when you need to...