DSA Appeal 2011
-
can't live without kiasu parents forum now. has become part & parcel of our daily life.

-
jtoh:
I must be the odd one out, or the naive one, bec when my dd went into GEP it didn't occur to me that there was the advantage of DSA. I just thought GEP was a good programme to bring out her potential. The things I know now.
I think if they scrap DSA, a lot of GEP parents would seriously reconsider putting their children in GEP liao.MandyMummy:
[quote=\"PiggyLalala\"]
I think if MOE decides to scrap off DSA, they have to communicate very clearly to the GEP parents during the briefing at P3. Any changes in these 3 years will definitely cause a lot of unhappiness and frustrations to the current parents whose child is in the program.
[/quote]you are not alone .... Same same here ..
-
PiggyLalala:
what do they have to lose? is the sole purpose of GEP -> IP?
I think if MOE decides to scrap off DSA, they have to communicate very clearly to the GEP parents during the briefing at P3. Any changes in these 3 years will definitely cause a lot of unhappiness and frustrations to the current parents whose child is in the program.Zhuge:
DSA should be scrapped. Just keep those DSA via CCAs will do.
It will resolve a lot of issues.
http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=29540
perhaps we can also scrap GEP :imcool: -
vlim:
Your kids did not turn out worst off.....maybe better off cos not much stress from parents who learned too much and planned too early - sometimes too much planning may not work too
you are not alone .... Same same here ..jtoh:
I must be the odd one out, or the naive one, bec when my dd went into GEP it didn't occur to me that there was the advantage of DSA. I just thought GEP was a good programme to bring out her potential. The things I know now.

-
vlim:
[/quote]me too when I made the decision for ds1 to try for the program.
you are not alone .... Same same here ..jtoh:
[quote=\"MandyMummy\"]
I must be the odd one out, or the naive one, bec when my dd went into GEP it didn't occur to me that there was the advantage of DSA. I just thought GEP was a good programme to bring out her potential. The things I know now.

However with so many kiasuparents in the forum these days, I am very sure that one reason parents enourage the child to take up the program is because of the so called 'easier' DSA. ( actually it is not easy for the boys too. But I would say it is a good experience. ) -
Pen88n:
Your kids did not turn out worst off.....maybe better off cos not much stress from parents who learned too much and planned too early - sometimes too much planning may not work too
you are not alone .... Same same here ..vlim:
[quote=\"jtoh\"]
I must be the odd one out, or the naive one, bec when my dd went into GEP it didn't occur to me that there was the advantage of DSA. I just thought GEP was a good programme to bring out her potential. The things I know now.

[/quote]I think so too. Sometimes too much knowledge is dangerous. Better to be oblivious and blissful and carefree than to be stressing out over what the Joneses are doing.
-
Ya, if they scrap DSA for GEP, the GEP program needs to run differently thus sacrificing the true essence of the program. The schools will have to start the PSLE preparation much earlier and not only in term 3 of P6. Also, some students may reconsider taking part in competitions as they take time away from PSLE preparation.
-
However now that I had gone through PSLE with ds1, I think i would not be so bold and naive to just let my ds to go through the program if there is no so called 2 chances for PSLE ( DSA and the actual PSLE). I would think twice and think hard and i would say it is a very difficult decision.
The reason being I think to get into a good secondary school( 6 years) is more crucial than the 3 years of good program in GEP. To have a good t-score, one has to be relatively good in all 4 subjects. The time spent in doing all the the projects may be better spent in drilling my child in his weakest subject and hence do better in the PSLE.
I also wonder if those geppers whose score is less than 255, would they have done better if they are in the mainstream where drilling and preparation for PSLE starts in P5. -
DSA, GEP and IP all have their virtues and were all started off with good intentions. Along the way, people find loopholes in the system to get a one-up over other people. People get upset because the system isnβt working out for them, although itβs working fine for the people they were intended for. So what do we do? Cry foul and throw out the baby with the bath water?
-
PiggyLalala:
I would think they will do better because they have time to work on their weak spots. But then, they may not be academically challenged if they need to do lots of drills.However now that I had gone through PSLE with ds1, I think i would not be so bold and naive to just let my ds to go through the program if there is no so called 2 chances for PSLE ( DSA and the actual PSLE). I would think twice and think hard and i would say it is a very difficult decision.
The reason being I think to get into a good secondary school( 6 years) is more crucial than the 3 years of good program in GEP. To have a good t-score, one has to be relatively good in all 4 subjects. The time spent in doing all the the projects may be better spent in drilling my child in his weakest subject and hence do better in the PSLE.
I also wonder if those geppers whose score is less than 255, would they have done better if they are in the mainstream where drilling and preparation for PSLE starts in P5.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login