Net rumour that Yaw Shin Leong having extra-maritial affair

[Lilac66]

The MP is not just any salaried worker. He was voted in by the people.He has to be accountable to the people. Borrowing one opposition leader’s words, on why this is a serious case, he said " If you can cheat your wife, you can cheat the public".


That’s why YSL must come out to defend himself if he’s innocent, though from the look of it, I think chance of him being guilty is 99.9% liao

[caroline3sg]

Jworld:

HyperKiasu:

[quote=\"peapot\"]How come there's no news in Straits Times?

there is in today's ST. he was absent even in the Meet MP session...
guess he has to step down... :?

who likely to replace him or will there be a by-election?[/quote]Give him some personal space to settle the issue.

[limlim]

Lilac66:

How do you expect him to keep the promises he made to his supporters during the election if he can betray a life-long promise to his wife.

What promise?

To stay by her side in times of rich or poor, sick or healthy?

Does sleeping with another woman contradict this promise?

Doesn't appear to be so leh..... just a comment.. on betrayal of promises..

but certainty.. as MP the public image will be discounted....

[limlim]

sall:

If the rumour is not true, why doesn't he defend himself? By not commenting, it makes him look more guilty.

from another POV..

If it is true, why don't the person who provided the news provide some concrete evidence? instead of letting pple guessing.

If no concrete evidence, why they provide this piece of news?

till now, it seems like there is no evidence yet??

[limlim]

peapot:

How come there's no news in Straits Times?

bcoz it is not yet a fact, but a rumor?

later ST kena sued if anyhow run stories.......?

[MMM]

This guy is our MP.


Our views are he should first by judged by his abilities to serve the residents. This is the KPI. On the affairs, that is his personal affair. Yes it is not right to have an affair. But being human, alot of things are not as clear as black and white. There may be some underlying issues/ stories that we are unaware of.

In any case, if the affair turns out to be the truth, it will no doubt cast a doubt on his morale values. But if he is able to serve the residents well, I feel that we shouldn’t fault him on that.

Separately, since it is only affairs and no corruption involved, people might be more tolerant (eg. Bill Clinton). Singaporeans seems to be more open now (eg. after seeing and reading so much) as compared to years ago.

[hquek]

MMM:

This guy is our MP.


Our views are he should first by judged by his abilities to serve the residents. This is the KPI. On the affairs, that is his personal affair. Yes it is not right to have an affair. But being human, alot of things are not as clear as black and white. There may be some underlying issues/ stories that we are unaware of.

Agree! If having affair makes one unfit to take care of constituent needs, I can think of others (not just SG, but globally also) who would have been similarly unfit. But those are still lauded for their accomplishments. Why then the different yardstick?

If this guy were guilty of corruption, nepotism, then yes, please vote him out.

[Lilac66]

limlim:

Lilac66:

How do you expect him to keep the promises he made to his supporters during the election if he can betray a life-long promise to his wife.

What promise?

To stay by her side in times of rich or poor, sick or healthy?

Does sleeping with another woman contradict this promise?

Doesn't appear to be so leh..... just a comment.. on betrayal of promises..

but certainty.. as MP the public image will be discounted....

I thought when you take the vow, it's understood that the promise is also to stay true to your partner?

[BeContented]

Lilac66:

limlim:

[quote=\"Lilac66\"]

How do you expect him to keep the promises he made to his supporters during the election if he can betray a life-long promise to his wife.

What promise?

To stay by her side in times of rich or poor, sick or healthy?

Does sleeping with another woman contradict this promise?

Doesn't appear to be so leh..... just a comment.. on betrayal of promises..

but certainty.. as MP the public image will be discounted....

I thought when you take the vow, it's understood that the promise is also to stay true to your partner? [/quote]Maybe cos' they have 2 'heads' ??
The one making the promise is keeping its promises :evil: :siam:

[buds]

Be Contented.... :hi5:


:rotflmao:

Only one head was thinking then bah..
Sigh... :roll: ...