PM Lee sends lawyer's letter to editors of TR Emeritus

[Way2GO]

bro, appreciate d effort.

but me old flower eyes, can’t read d small text.
Maybe hv to sacrifice a cup of teh tarik today for a copy of ST.

My post earlier refers to using defamation suits as a tool
after reading rayusan’s post.
Rayusan - u meant d same?

[justcoping]

BlueBells:

Let the truth prevails then ....


But I really pity the people related to the high profile / high ranking, aka A-listers. If these people are truly capable high flyers, there will always be a faction who will never give them due credit, except to think they reach where they are because they are related to the A-listers.

Agree! :goodpost:

[Trapwithin]

I think the important thing is to have the facts to back their views.

In today’s internet age, a lot of posting is based on hearsay and many times not substantiate with evidences. Maybe if they use words like "rumours" rather than making a statement would be better

[Strparent]

from the Straits Times....... for the old flowery eyeshttp://i43.tinypic.com/2lutc83.gif\">


http://i42.tinypic.com/35mle34.jpg\">
http://i43.tinypic.com/jkyvr6.jpg\">
http://i41.tinypic.com/zlxma1.jpg\">
http://i42.tinypic.com/2qldgl4.jpg\">


this one NOT from ST

http://i42.tinypic.com/s2txl4.jpg\">

[raysusan]

[quote]her appointment has nothing to do with her family connection[/quote]

who agree here?

[Way2GO]

Strparent, danke for d ST article.

I lioke ur pic of d skeletons.

Any copy of lawyer's letter as vk2010 mentioned?
I had a relook into A&G letter n Alex Au's response.
Had a laugh.
d alleged defamatory comments were right there in d lawyer's letter.
Alex Au gladly obliged by removing d offending allegations
n CHA by posting d letter in FULL with d alleged defamatory comments as requested.
Anyone else saw d irony of dis?

[raysusan]

this saga reminds me about this video again....

watch after 10mins

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbnaDEEUQ8g][/youtube]

'sue until your pants drop'

[3Boys]

Way2GO:

Strparent, danke for d ST article.

I lioke ur pic of d skeletons.

Any copy of lawyer's letter as vk2010 mentioned?
I had a relook into A&G letter n Alex Au's response.
Had a laugh.
d alleged defamatory comments were right there in d lawyer's letter.
Alex Au gladly obliged by removing d offending allegations
n CHA by posting d letter in FULL with d alleged defamatory comments as requested.
Anyone else saw d irony of dis?

So Alex Au is right or 'clever' in making unsubstantiated comments then?

[3Boys]

I thought we were talking about transparency a few threads ago? Now its okay for people to make wild allegations and the people being maligned should just shut up?

[Strparent]

3Boys:

Way2GO:

Strparent, danke for d ST article.

I lioke ur pic of d skeletons.

Any copy of lawyer's letter as vk2010 mentioned?
I had a relook into A&G letter n Alex Au's response.
Had a laugh.
d alleged defamatory comments were right there in d lawyer's letter.
Alex Au gladly obliged by removing d offending allegations
n CHA by posting d letter in FULL with d alleged defamatory comments as requested.
Anyone else saw d irony of dis?

So Alex Au is right or 'clever' in making unsubstantiated comments then?

Way2Go,
Yes I saw the irony indeed. On one hand, the defamatory comments were asked to be removed ( rightly ), but the lawyer letter was asked to be posted in full ( contents including the said 'comments' ) :scared: what de ?

3Boys, did anyone in KSP posted that is okay to malign someone ? :scratchhead: :scratchhead: We all agree it is wrong to malign anyone if the allegations are not true nor proven.

This is off topic ( thread here is on TRE ) as regard to your question above, but you are barking up the wrong tree, I think.
Alex Au did not make those unsubstantiated comments. It was another forumer 'Scooba' who posted on Alex's blog under comments.