All About 2011 GCE A-Level Examination Results
-
[quote="Zhuge"]A comparison of A Level results: RI,HCI,VJC,NJC,TJC,DHS,RVHS
Following information obtained from above schools’ websites.
The percentage scoring at least 3 distinctions in H2 subjects.
Please correct if there are mistakes.
1. RI - 68%
Half of the cohort scored a distinction in all 4 H2 subjects, the highest since the first cohort who offered the revised A-Level curriculum in 2007. 622 students (50%) scored 4 distinctions in the content-based subjects, and 853 students (68%) scored 3 distinctions in the content-based subjects.
2. HCI - more than 50%
Over half the cohort of 1200 has scored at least 3 H2 Distinctions
3. VJC - 50%
1 in 2 Victorians scored at least 3 distinctions in H2 content-based subjects and record-breaking 28% Victorians scored 4 distinctions in H2 content-based subjects.
4. NJC - 44%
Overall, 44% of students scored 3 or 4 H2 Distinctions
5. TJC - not available
6. DHS - 40%
40% of the cohort achieved at least 3 H2 Distinctions.
7. RVHS - 44%
Highlights
- 3 students obtained 8 or more Distinctions
- 28 students obtained 7 or more Distinctions
- 90 students or 24% of the cohort obtained 6 or more Distinctions
- 27% of the cohort achieved at least 4 H2 Distinctions
- 44% of the cohort achieved at least 3 H2 Distinctions -
why some schools not willing to disclose publicly % / number of distinction instead of lumping A & B as one band ? is it too few A?
why some schools not willing to disclose % / number of 4 H2 distinctions instead of broadly saying 3 H2 or more distinctions ? is it too few 4 H2 distinctions ?
it is impossible to compare....that is the objective. -
RV’s 27% with 4H2 distinctions is almost same as HCI and VJC.
-
Percentage of cohort which achieved at least 3 H2 Distinctions:
1. RI - 68%
2. HCI - more than 50%
3. VJC - 50%
4. NJC - 44%
5. RVHS - 44%
6. DHS - 40%
7. TJC - not available -
Zhuge:
I am very sure RV has better H1 results than NJC because the percentage with 6 or more distinctions is significantly higher.Percentage of cohort which achieved at least 3 H2 Distinctions:
1. RI - 68%
2. HCI - more than 50%
3. VJC - 50%
4. NJC - 44%
5. RVHS - 44%
6. DHS - 40%
7. TJC - not available -
WeiHan:
ok.
I am very sure RV has better H1 results than NJC because the percentage with 6 or more distinctions is significantly higher.Zhuge:
Percentage of cohort which achieved at least 3 H2 Distinctions:
1. RI - 68%
2. HCI - more than 50%
3. VJC - 50%
4. NJC - 44%
5. RVHS - 44%
6. DHS - 40%
7. TJC - not available
things may change when the other schools goes IP
RI, HCI, VJ, etc may not be getting the top students from non-IP schools -
verykiasu2010:
At first glance, I also find the statistics uncomparable :scratchhead: Some stats are cumulative too eg at least 3H2 Distinctions. Thanks to Zhuge for summary. Of course every JC wants to present the stats to their advantage :evil:why some schools not willing to disclose publicly % / number of distinction instead of lumping A & B as one band ? is it too few A?
why some schools not willing to disclose % / number of 4 H2 distinctions instead of broadly saying 3 H2 or more distinctions ? is it too few 4 H2 distinctions ?
it is impossible to compare....that is the objective.
Juz like the quality passes in pri Sch... Thanks to phtthp who collate stats in one thread. I guess we can only come here KSP to get more 'insightful' stats 
-
WeiHan:
RV's 27% with 4H2 distinctions is almost same as HCI and VJC.
From the stats, seems like it. More comparable between RV and HCI the IPs which took in the top scorers from PSLE. VJC is not full IP for this batch yet and many of its students were from O level track. -
Snow Crystal:
Yes. I pull my hat off for VJ. Wonder how they do it with a 50% without top psle scorer.WeiHan:
RV's 27% with 4H2 distinctions is almost same as HCI and VJC.
From the stats, seems like it. More comparable between RV and HCI the IPs which took in the top scorers from PSLE. VJC is not full IP for this batch yet and many of its students were from O level track.
COP for this batch RV was 253. HCI 257 or 258 or 259 (for NYGH which join HCI for A level, COP was much higher) -
So far we can only gather the mean rank pts of the following jcs:
RI - 85.5
HCI-84.8
NJC-82
ACJC-80.4
Using mean score is a more accurate measurement vs no of distinctions as the latter include mt, pw and gp. Moreover, using international yardstick, the general trend is based on 3 H2 content subjects and personal statement which i feel is more holistic than our local unis.
All in all, my opinion of individual jc’s performance in each acedemic yr should be judged on their mean score + 3 h2 contents grade ie % of students who obtained quality grades of AAA/AAB/ABB.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login