2012 P1 Registration Exercise for 2013 In-Take

[kitcat]

phtthp:

whether pure or impure SC parents, so long as child is SC, child given priority to go in.

with many prs kids go to non-popular schools, maybe year after year those non-popular schools become popular schools... who knows...

[kitcat]

phtthp:

i think the whole issue lies in the fact that there are more than enough schools in SG, with so many more brand new schools built in Sengkang, Jurong, Punggol, etc - but there are not enough good schools to go round, meet the needs of all parents.


In fact P1 registration statistics reveal some schools not even 50% occupied nobody want, on the verge of closing down.

don't understand why MOE don't initiate Task force investigative study teams go down to assess, figure out and try to bring up the standard of such low enrolment schools. This is the key issue, crux of the problem.

MOE should seriously explore this area how to bring up the standard have more GOOD schools, if really want to sing the tune that \"All schools are good\".

i agree with you...
btw, just curious how those good teachers decide which school they want to teach in? distance from where they stay? quality of students?

[angerer]

I am a newbie here. Any feedback on Fengshan Pri Sch.

Thank you.

[angerer]

btw my daughter will be register for P1 this coming June/July.

Staying at Bedok. Looking for am session for my daughter.

[h530251]

kitcat:

with many prs kids go to non-popular schools, maybe year after year those non-popular schools become popular schools... who knows...

Why pr go into non popular school, the school will become popular school next time ?

[kitcat]

[quote]Why pr go into non popular school, the school will become popular school next time ?[/quote]
saw someone said in this thread or some other thread that there are more tiger-moms in prs...

[dorisp]

kitcat:

saw someone said in this thread or some other thread that there are more tiger-moms in prs...

:shock:

[phtthp]

kitcat:

with many prs kids go to non-popular schools, maybe year after year those non-popular schools become popular schools... who knows...

Why pr go into non popular school, the school will become popular school next time ?[/quote]

because:-

a) there are PR parents who are very \"on\" type, urge their kids on.

b) there are PR kids (can come from China, India, Malaysia, Hongkong, etc) whose character are resilient, humble, modest, very determined, self motivated, possess self drive towards success, adopt \"Never Say Die\" attitude.

example:-
when Qiu Biqing came to Singapore at 10 years old, her English was so bad that she had problems forming full sentences.

Three years down the road, she became Singapore's top PSLE student, with a score of 290 and an A* in English.
http://www.asiaone.com/News/Education/Story/A1Story20091126-182561.html

hope to see more PR kids like her, from whichever nationality.
They will create history, in time to come.

[qms]

zakashi:

Not fair. This system still support PR. They should scrutinized parents' identity too. They must be SC to be given the priority.

Zakashi, please air your views in the other thread:

http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=33566&start=380

[qms]

phtthp:

don't understand why MOE don't initiate Task force investigative study teams go down to assess, figure out and try to bring up the standard of such low enrolment schools. This is the key issue, crux of the problem.


MOE should seriously explore this area how to bring up the standard have more GOOD schools, if really want to sing the tune that \"All schools are good\".

Some parents think that, for instance, SAP schools are good. SAP schools teach values, etc. that non-SAP schools do not teach. This is perception. How do you think MOE is able to change perception? By making all schools SAP?