Former SCDF and CNB chiefs arrested

[Lilac66]

RRMummy:

Funz:

I would suggest that unless you are able to verify and confirm that the pictures circulating in other forums are indeed the actual pictures of the women involved, do not circulate them.


And in any case, why do we need to know what these people look like?

i agree!

For me, it's more of a fact that I hope these people will be shamed (whether it's the men or women) so that people will think twice before engaging in such filthy transactions just to climb the corporate ladder. I know this is not a 100% deterrent for sure, but let it do some good.
I'm not that curious to know how these women look like other than the fact that now more people will know their misdeeds. But like I mentioned in my previous post, another side of me feel this is doing alot of damage to the families who are innocent. :sad:


Imagine one of the women's pri school kid's friends and mothers(after the photos exposed) saying \"Oh, this is so-and-so's mummy, I've seen her fetching him to school\".

[RRMummy]

schweppes:

Does it matter what these women look like? :scratchhead:


Just wondering if it can turn libelous and the owner of the pic sues the online posters for false accusation - especially since she is not the woman accused in the PL case? :?

:hi5: same thought schweppes!!

[concern2]

HVR:

limlim:

[quote=\"Cheepoozz\"]Is this the sort of high calibre people that the singapore government is wasting our tax payers $$ on. What is going on with these educated people ?


Teachers, Principals, high ranking government officials, scholars .... seriously i think the schools should brush up and teach e younger generation about moral values, ethics...

According to someone's logic....

their pay not high enough.. hence they corrupt..

I think 'corrupt' doesn't necessary mean receive money. In this case, he was alleged to show favour in return for sexual service. Which mean nothing to do with high pay.[/quote]Interesting point! Nice to see you at recess time again, HVR!

[mamabear]

Just read in the news that they had s** in his own apartment! Goodness! that desperate, that lusful. :mad: To do in own house in own bed shared with wife. It is just so disgusting!!! :stompfeet:

[limlim]

phtthp:

limlim, can you pls help to clarify ?

why did you point to above hyperlink and said is the wrong one ?

inside above hyperlink -
i only READ about the printed one page article from Channel News Asia but i did NOT SEE any picture of her inside this hyperlink, did you ?

Hi phtthp,

By clicking on the link you provided, the first post shows an image link

Moderator's note: Erroneous link removed.

Althou you did not see any embedded pictures displayed, there was an image link, which, if user copy and paste, they can see the picture.

Anyway, I just highlight that the picture is the wrong person, in case there is misunderstanding from other readers. There is no other intention.



Regards

[janet88]

mamabear:

Just read in the news that they had s** in his own apartment! Goodness! that desperate, that lusful. :mad: To do in own house in own bed shared with wife. It is just so disgusting!!! :stompfeet:

That bloody damn assho^* had sex with other women in his own house and on marital bed. Wonder if his wife threw away the bed. Can't go to hotel 81 meh? That man is named with pic in ST...but the women who did it with him also named (full names printed) and 2 are married. How to face others?

[limlim]

HVR:

limlim:

According to someone's logic....

their pay not high enough.. hence they corrupt..

I think 'corrupt' doesn't necessary mean receive money. In this case, he was alleged to show favour in return for sexual service. Which mean nothing to do with high pay.

Which means, even if you pay someone millions, it doesn't meant that they will not corrupt.

So, by your statement \"Which mean nothing to do with high pay\", we pay millions so as to reduce the chance of them pocketing extra money ONLY, and the high pay is not to prevent them from being corrupted (for power, etc..) ????????

Is that what you're saying? since you seems to imply that because his kind of corruption is not related to high pay, the notion of giving HIGH pay to prevent them \"pocketing extra money\" ONLY is still noble and justified, and not disgraced by this incident?

So, to prevent corruption of power, the state must give office holder unlimited power?

So, to prevent corruption of vice, the state must give them lots of women??

If HIGH pay does not cover all (forms of corruption), the state must give them the benefits of that kind to prevent against corruption of that kind?

[limlim]

Please do not confuse this case of corruption with EMA like YSL’s


This is a case of bribery and conflict of interest, and abuse of power… a clear cut example of CORRUPTION… YSL’s private affairs didn’t even come close by any yardstick…

[janet88]

Don’t get mixed up. This ex-SCDF chief Peter Lim gave govt contracts in exchange for sex. This fella literally pulled the women down with him as well…telling police they had sex or oral sex on him.

[HVR]

limlim:

HVR:

[quote=\"limlim\"]
According to someone's logic....

their pay not high enough.. hence they corrupt..

I think 'corrupt' doesn't necessary mean receive money. In this case, he was alleged to show favour in return for sexual service. Which mean nothing to do with high pay.

Which means, even if you pay someone millions, it doesn't meant that they will not corrupt.

So, by your statement \"Which mean nothing to do with high pay\", we pay millions so as to reduce the chance of them pocketing extra money ONLY, and the high pay is not to prevent them from being corrupted (for power, etc..) ????????

Is that what you're saying? since you seems to imply that because his kind of corruption is not related to high pay, the notion of giving HIGH pay to prevent them \"pocketing extra money\" ONLY is still noble and justified, and not disgraced by this incident?

So, to prevent corruption of power, the state must give office holder unlimited power?

So, to prevent corruption of vice, the state must give them lots of women??

If HIGH pay does not cover all (forms of corruption), the state must give them the benefits of that kind to prevent against corruption of that kind?[/quote]I just merely pointed out this 'corruption' case has got nothing to do with money, why get so work up? I am just glad the law does consider other form of 'corruptions' and is able to take action against the guilty one. Cannot understand your logic. So to stop people from stealing, we just give them what they want?