THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[SAHM_TAN]

pirate:

I want a four person civil union! :stompfeet:


We should be referred to as Parent 1, Parent 2, Parent 3 and Parent 4. :grphug:

I'm not sure if here have but other ctries yes.

[Nebbermind]

pirate:

I want a four person civil union! :stompfeet:


We should be referred to as Parent 1, Parent 2, Parent 3 and Parent 4. :grphug:

You meant Pirate1, Pirate2, Pirate3 & Pirate4, right?

[limlim]

thisis2012:

If the PAP allows polygamy, one husband multiple wives, will your vote still go to them?

Yes.. of course.

That's the way mother nature designed it to be.

Anyway.. polygamy is allowed for some pple.. LEGALLY.

in case you're not aware.

Surely AWARE is aware of it but they can't do anything..

[Nebbermind]

Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:

[limlim]

pirate:

I want a four person civil union! :stompfeet:


We should be referred to as Parent 1, Parent 2, Parent 3 and Parent 4. :grphug:

Or you can call them East. South, West, North parents......

depending on which is their favorite position on the dry pool..

[limlim]

Nebbermind:

Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:

Not very efficient to propagate the species..

[Funz]

limlim:

Nebbermind:

Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:

Not very efficient to propagate the species..

Still efficient what. If husband 1 shoots blanks, still got husband 2, 3 & 4.

[SAHM_TAN]

Nebbermind:

Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:

Men lack the ability to maintain such a household in harmony

[limlim]

Funz:

limlim:

[quote=\"Nebbermind\"]Will AWARE lobby for one wife, multiple husbands??!! :evil:

Not very efficient to propagate the species..

Still efficient what. If husband 1 shoots blanks, still got husband 2, 3 & 4.[/quote]That is a medical situation.. not by design.

It is not in the best interest of the species to pursue a system just to cater for exceptional situations as it would result in blatant waste of resources and sinful inefficiency.

[straffan23]

May I point out one thing, please? IMHO, besides respecting gender and sexual preference of the parents, a very important point to note is that they are trying to free the children from prejudice. Whether it is being prejudiced for having same-sex parents; or unknowingly having prejudice thoughts ingrained into their young minds (i.e. having their yound minds coloured of what is right or wrong). Don't we always maintain that children are the innocent party?


IMHO, sexual orientation is not always a choice. We do not know everyone, so we should not judge everyone based on our ideals. Everyone should have the right to happiness, so long as in doing so they do not inflict any harm on others. We do not need to agree with them. We just need to respect them.

p/s: don't shoot me!