Logo
    • Education
      • Pre-School
      • Primary Schools Directory
      • Primary Schools Articles
      • P1 Registration
      • DSA
      • PSLE
      • Secondary
      • Tertiary
      • Special Needs
    • Lifestyle
      • Well-being
    • Activities
      • Events
    • Enrichment & Services
      • Find A Service Provider
      • Enrichment Articles
      • Enrichment Services
      • Tuition Centre/Private Tutor
      • Infant Care/ Childcare / Student Care Centre
      • Kindergarten/Preschool
      • Private Institutions and International Schools
      • Special Needs
      • Indoor & Outdoor Playgrounds
      • Paediatrics
      • Neonatal Care
    • Forum
    • ASKQ
    • Register
    • Login

    PSLE 2012 - Results Discussion

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Secondary Schools - Selection
    1.5k Posts 357 Posters 475.5k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      HAPPYH
      last edited by

      CayennePepper:
      phtthp:


      The GEP kids naturally will score better in PSLE - cos they have special teachers, special care and learn much more than Mainstream pupils.

      But... the GEP curriculum is not targeted at preparing for PSLE.


      Exposure to various things really matters.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O Offline
        octoberbaby
        last edited by

        I love that letter to MOE. I agreed with DSA process, why GEP students are given different route compared to mainstream students?


        Please keep us update with the reply from the authority.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          HAPPYH
          last edited by

          CKmum:
          Why r some parents here getting narrow minded about d GEppers n keep targeting them juz becos their own children r nt?

          To be fair for the mainstreamers.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K Offline
            kwcllf
            last edited by

            Coolkidsrock2:
            This seems to be true for 5 kids I know, out by at least 1 big figure from expectations.

            True for my DD. But what does this mean?
            1. Cohort mean score has gone up
            2. number students having 260+ t-score have increased significantly.[/quote]

            I'm puzzled too. Could it be 1 or 2 schools producing too many top scorers and thus pulling others down?[/quote]

            Nobody to answer our questions. Don't know where to find the answers.Very stunned n puzzled.
            My daughter was in the top 10 range in her school. Now the others who were far behind has overtaken her.
            Now I know how the hare, in the tortoise and hare story, felt after the tortoise had won(though we did not fell asleep like the tortoise).[/quote]

            I have spoken to my kid's tutor earlier. He said some of his students in the top of their respective classes saw their T Score dropped significantly. The same happened to my kid as his result is below what he is capable of. This is a big surprise to the tutor and he said some of his students' parents will be going back to their kids' school to try to find out why the large difference in PSLE results and school results.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              Mawar
              last edited by

              Remind and reassure your child that PSLE score does not change who he is overnight. Still the same person. The choice of secondary is just another milestone in a long journey. Entering his dream school does not guarantee anything, just the pleasure of donning the uniform and badge.


              One parent shared that by enrolling in a secondary school with lower COP might in fact, be a blessing in disguise ie getting into better classes, priority in CCA selection and a greater chance to shine.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C Offline
                cluelessmama
                last edited by

                CayennePepper:
                sinoboy:



                Agree not targeting the GEP. Just that some top schools pre-selected these students using DSA on the assumption that they are truly gifted. It would be a fairer system if GEPpers are put to the test at PSLE to see how truly 'gifted' they are.

                Erm, many geppers also go through GAT for DSA. Just like those who apply through other domains. And i'm personally aware that not all geppers get COs; top schs are selective and are not as 'indiscriminating' as many parents presume.

                Definitely OT already!

                Totally agree with you, CayennePepper.

                For those who have said/implied in one or another that the GEP seems to have specially prepared the students for PSLE - you don't understand what GEP is about. For GEP students, the school usually doesn't really start preparing them for the PSLE until well after the 2nd term (only in July and for some schools, late July/early August) unlike their mainstream counterparts who have been geared towards the PSLE since day one of P6. In fact, they still have to submit their social studies portfoliio in July and take their social studies exams in August. GEP students may have been exposed to more challenging topics but usually some of these are out of the PSLE examination boundaries.

                So, if a parents' hope is that their child gets into GEP so that will he or girl will be given \"special training\" become the top scorer for PSLE, then they will be in for a rude shock. This is because GEP is not about giving special treatment for a group of students so that they can score well for PSLE. GEP is about differentiated learning for this group for children who may become bored and disinterested in learning if they are are not mentally challenged.

                It's not my intention to offend anyone in this forum. I wish that one will not make sweeping statement or unsubstantiated statement. Be fair to all - I'm sure that all the P6s have worked hard regardless of results. They deserved to be praised.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  sinoboy
                  last edited by

                  kwcllf:


                  My views to Singapore Conversation:



                  ------------------------------
                  On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 7:19 PM PST Our Singapore Conversation wrote:

                  >
                  >
                  >Dear XXX
                  >
                  >Thank you for taking the time and effort to pen
                  >down and share your thoughts and ideas about the DSA process, and how to
                  >tweak processes and procedures to make it more equitable. We understand
                  >that the selection criteria for children to secondary school and the
                  >PSLE examinations are of as much importance to parents as they are to
                  >the children who are taking the examinations, and your suggestions are
                  >well taken!
                  >
                  >We will take your views into consideration as we continue
                  >organising the dialogue sessions to develop a collective vision for the
                  >future. Specific policy ideas will also be deliberated at a later stage,
                  >as we involve Singaporeans in a series of discussions on how to achieve
                  >our collective vision together.
                  >
                  >The Our Singapore Conversation is an
                  >opportunity for us to reaffirm what is good and relevant; recalibrate in
                  >areas where we might have gone off course; and refresh to break new
                  >ground. Would you be keen to participate in one of these dialogues? I
                  >think that your experiences and ideas would be a valuable contribution
                  >to the conversation.
                  >
                  >Please consider registering for a session at
                  >https://www.oursgconversation.sg/lets-talk-2/signup/ [1].
                  >
                  >Thank you
                  >once again, and do also encourage your friends to take part in this
                  >national conversation on Singapore's future.
                  >
                  >Warm regards,
                  >
                  >Tim @ Our
                  >Singapore Secretariat
                  >
                  >On 2012-11-20 15:00, Weng Chi Kuan wrote:
                  >
                  >>
                  >Dear Sirs,
                  >>
                  >> The topic on reducing stress for the PSLE exam has
                  >stirred emotions considerably and it is almost impossible to find a
                  >solution that satisfy everyone.
                  >>
                  >> I have a son who took his PSLE
                  >exam this year and is anxiously waiting for his results this Thursday.
                  >Having gone through the process with him, I wish to offer some thoughts
                  >on the process of secondary admission to make it fairer.
                  >>
                  >> With the
                  >introduction of Direct School Admission (DSA), the MOE has given schools
                  >a certain degree of discretion in admitting students that have special
                  >abilities in other areas, such as sports. Although this gives a student
                  >a \"better\" chance of being admitted to a Elite or Top school, I strongly
                  >feel the system can be made more equitable.
                  >>
                  >> My son has also gone
                  >through the DSA route, but unfortunately, he was unsuccessful.
                  >Nevertheless, the experience I gained from the process I hope to share
                  >with you.
                  >>
                  >> By reading through forums like Kiasuparents, I have
                  >gathered that many parents have used the DSA process as an \"insurance\"
                  >policy. Many would apply for multiple schools through DSA and quite a
                  >number of them have been successful in more than one schools. As they
                  >only decides whether to accept the \"Confirmed Offer\" after they have
                  >taken the PSLE exam, such hoarding of places have denied other equally
                  >deserving students of getting into their \"Dream\" schools.
                  >>
                  >> For
                  >those that have \"Confirmed Offers\", they will obviously be less stressedm
                  >when taking their PSLE exam, compared to those that did not gain entry
                  >into any schools through DSA (or those that did not apply for DSA), as
                  >they can fall back on the \"Confirmed Offers\" given to them. This will
                  >cause an unlevel playing field for these two sets of students taking the
                  >PSLE exam. For those that do not have a \"Confirmed Offer\" through DSA,
                  >they will have to slog it out in the DO-OR-DIE PSLE exam. Obviously,
                  >this will add on to the stress level that MOE is trying so hard to
                  >lessen.
                  >>
                  >> Currently, successful DSA applicants will decide whether
                  >to accpet the \"Confirmed Offers\" ONLY after they sat for their PSLE
                  >exam. If they felt that they did no do too well, then they can decide
                  >after the PSLE exam to accept the \"Confirmed Offers\" and need not wait
                  >for the release of PSLE results. Why are they given such an Advantage
                  >over students that are unsuccessful in their DSA or those that did not
                  >apply?? To eradicate this anomaly, successful DSA applicants must decide
                  >whether to accept the \"Confirmed Offer\" before sitting for the PSLE
                  >exam. If they don't want to accept the \"Confirmed Offer\", then they must
                  >compete Fairly with everyone else in the PSLE exam to gain entry into
                  >their \"Dream\" schools.
                  >>
                  >> Also, applying for DSA can be an expensive
                  >affair. For example, ACS Independent charges $80.00 and School of
                  >Science and Technology $95.00 to take the placement tests. This can be a
                  >huge burden to not-so-well-to-do families. In other words, the process
                  >favours the better-off families that can afford to apply for multiple
                  >DSAs. For those that cannot afford, then they will have less chances of
                  >getting the schools they wanted via DSA.
                  >>
                  >> In DSA exercises, some
                  >Elite schools have separate admission criteria for Gifted Education
                  >Programme (GEP) and Mainstream students. Although the GEP programme has
                  >been well-debated over the years, should we still want to differentiate
                  >the two sets of students gaiing admission into secondary schools. I feel
                  >that this should be abolished so that admission will be fair to all
                  >students. If need be, after the students enter secondary schools, they
                  >can be re-sorted and exceptionally academically bright students can be
                  >offered special programmes. As we know, GEP students are exposed to
                  >higher-order exposures in the various subjects and I am sure most take
                  >Math Olympiad courses which will give them an a Clear advantage over
                  >students in the Mainstream.
                  >>
                  >> Although I support MOE's DSA approach
                  >to offer students different pathways into their \"dream\" schools, clearly
                  >the system has to be tweaked to make it fairer. The following is my
                  >humble suggestion:
                  >>
                  >> 1) limit the number of DSA applications
                  >(perhaps to a maximum of 2)
                  >> 2) make it less expensive to take the DSA
                  >placement tests
                  >> 3) students given \"Confirmed Offers\" via DSA MUST
                  >decide whether to accept the offer prior to sitting for the PSLE exam.
                  >Those that do not want to accept the \"Confirmed Offer\" must give up ASAP
                  >(ie, shorten the deadline than currently) to prevent hoarding of school
                  >places and free them up for students that really want them.
                  >> 4) sort
                  >out students given \"Confirmed Offers\" via DSA early. Those who decide to
                  >give up their \"Confirmed Offers\" will compete with everyone else to gain
                  >admission into their \"Dream\" schools through the PSLE exam in an
                  >equitable environment.
                  >>
                  >> Best Regards
                  >>
                  >> XXX
                  >>

                  >
                  >Links:
                  >------
                  >[1]
                  >https://www.oursgconversation.sg/lets-talk-2/signup/
                  Well looking at the standard response leads me to conclude that they will keep silent on how T scores will be awarded and keep quiet on who are the top students to avoid more complaints of unfairness like this. Hope the authorities can really look into the GEP/DSA loopholes. 🦆

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • O Offline
                    octoberbaby
                    last edited by

                    HAPPYH:
                    CKmum:

                    Why r some parents here getting narrow minded about d GEppers n keep targeting them juz becos their own children r nt?


                    To be fair for the mainstreamers.



                    Definitely GEPpers are the target because MOE draws a 'rosy' pictures for us. Not everyone is knowledgable like you. The impression MOE gives is that GEP is 'Tian Cai ban'.
                    Our expectations for GEPers are high. We don't expect them to be the next Chipmunk or Gay cases.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C Offline
                      cluelessmama
                      last edited by

                      octoberbaby:
                      I love that letter to MOE. I agreed with DSA process, why GEP students are given different route compared to mainstream students?


                      Please keep us update with the reply from the authority.
                      GEP students need to go through interviews too. For some, they need to take the GAT too. Some geppers, like the mainstreamers, were not successful in their DSA application.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H Offline
                        HAPPYH
                        last edited by

                        slmkhoo:
                        cherryc:

                        MOE states that :

                        Our goal in education is to provide every child with the opportunity to develop holistically and maximise his or her potential. In creating opportunities for all, MOE will ensure that every school is a good school.[/color]

                        Probably some will get more opportunities ? Education is a child's basic right . Sports , arts , you have a choice….

                        It doesn't say that it will endeavour to have every child score the same (top) mark. The assumption of several (many) here seems to be that given the same opportunities, teachers, materials, environment etc, every child can do equally well. I can vouch for the fact that this is not the case - my 2 kids have identical environment, support, teaching etc etc available to them, but one consistently underperforms compared to the other by a large margin, even though she works harder and longer hours. I do support the idea of good provision and support for all, but what is best for any individual child also varies from child to child. If I provided for and coached my 2 kids the same way, either one would be dead bored or the other would be quite lost. So I come down on the side of some separation into ability groups. However, I would like to see these groupings re-assessed from year to year so a particular group is not singled out as 'smart' or 'slow' for the rest of their school lives.

                        Of course, I agree not all 5 fingers are same. However, we must give the same level of exposure (expected at PSLE exam) to all the pupils. Depending on their ability, they will perform in the exams. Whether we agree or not, there is a considerable amount of difference in the QUALITY of worksheets our pupils are doing (I am not sure about the quality of teaching) from a neighbourhood school and those ELITE schools. If there is a choice, of course, everyone wants to choose the ELITE school. If not, they want to match the standard = enrichment, buying trolleys of assessment books, taking leave/quitting the job to teach at home..........No end

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 77
                        • 78
                        • 79
                        • 80
                        • 81
                        • 154
                        • 155
                        • 79 / 155
                        • First post
                          Last post



                        Online Users
                        sharonkhooS
                        sharonkhoo

                        Recent Topics
                        New to the KiasuParents forum? Tips and Tricks!
                        How do you maintain your relationship with your spouse?
                        Budgeting for tougher times ahead. What's yours?
                        SkillsFuture + anything related to upskilling/learning something new!
                        How much do you spend on the kids' tuition/enrichments?
                        DSA 2026
                        PSLE Discussions and Strategies

                        Statistics

                        5

                        Online

                        210.6k

                        Users

                        34.1k

                        Topics

                        1.8m

                        Posts
                          About Us Contact Us forum Terms of Service Privacy Policy