Are you ready for 7 million people on tiny Singapore?
-
Are your friends in the restructured hospitals, Irrelevant? I have heard otherwise from my friend. The older doctors who are products of the previous system received better training than the junior ones today. Perhaps you can check with your friends if this is true or if my friend was generalizing.
-
If this carries on, I might even become a fan of TOC at some point.... :evil:
An incredibly erudite write-up, I thought.
--> http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2013/02/rules-managers-turn-immigrants/
\"I am an unashamed capitalist. But I subscribe to the principle of fair play. In the pursuit of growth, the ones higher up the ladder have a responsibility to make sure that the people below do not lose. It is not right if those at the top enjoy the spoils and leave those below to bear the social costs.
Like someone in the limelight who recently announced that both he and his wife have cars, so do my wife and I. But not everyone has a personal vehicle. I can sympathise with those who have to jam themselves into overcrowded trains and buses and fight for space in other packed public facilities.
I feel that those steering Singapore have forgotten that their first responsibility is to their electorate. They should be taking care of the people who put them into power – meaning, first and foremost, Singapore citizens.
I received my best education in business ethics during my years in Inchcape plc from 1986 to 1995. Though the British were anything but perfect colonial masters, as evidenced by the atrocities that they committed while ruling India, in the waning years of the matured Empire, a sense of fair play did develop........\" -
Good read. Thanks for sharing.
-
Ironic that the British were able to lull the inhabitants of Hong Kong for some 150 years into not bothering with democracy, elections and whatnot, isn’t it? And that despite all the privileges they reserved for themselves as colonial masters.
-
pirate:
yeah this is going viral. whilst it might not be completely authentic, it doesn't detract from the fact that there are many good points being made there.
What can I say? Doesn't 'smell' right.raysusan:
This \"letter\" is making the rounds in some forum, purportedly written by a grassroots leader.
http://therealsingapore.com/content/letter-grassroots-leader-pm
very interesting letter
[We are not sure of its authenticity. Read it and judge for yourself:] -
I thought this was interesting too.
http://www.todayonline.com/commentary/mind-short-term-trade-offs
Given the record to date, it is natural to be concerned about whether productivity gains can be raised to the level required, and how soon this could occur. Since the computation is done on a per worker basis, would curbing reliance on foreign manpower produce the gains required — or are there other conditions as well? How soon will the improvements be manifested?
If we use real output per worker as the measure of labour productivity, then Singapore’s growth performance deteriorated significantly after 2005. Using the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (WDI) database, among the 121 countries for which data is available, Singapore’s ranking plunged from 15th in the 2001 to 2005 period to 85th in 2005 to 2011.
In terms of number of places dropped, we were only outdone (or under-performed!) by Bahrain (which dropped 76 places), Iceland (77) and Kuwait (82). Interestingly, all are also high income countries. In addition, Kuwait and Bahrain also have high rates of dependence on foreign manpower.
While Iceland did not have the same extent of dependence on foreign manpower, its rate of immigration in the period 2005 to 2010 was one of the highest in the world. Yet, even if we consider only high income countries, our ranking in terms of productivity gains dropped from second to 21st out of 44 countries between the same two periods (2001 to 2005 versus 2005 to 2011). -
pirate:
You should just take an average of low and medium range but not high range la. Those high range are considered luxury. Anyway, they can work out a figure for each category for basic food & necessitates, medical expenses (of course only for the sick) and children products (only for children). They should not go into detail which one can claim and which one cannot claim. Only those SG citizen (children, SAHW, retires, sick but unemployed) can claim the GST (dependent on which category) from them.
Nah, exempt this or exempt that for this but not that buyer is administratively cumbersome. How to exempt brand X stroller costing $200 but not brand Y stroller costing $800? UK had good fun over whether certain pastry falls under exempt food or non-exempt baked products. Is a $10,000 rare first edition technically a \"book\" and hence exempt from VAT? GST vouchers are much more straightforward.JannettLee:
How many people who are entertained to this GST vouchers let alone bigger GST vouchers?
I should not be the one who provide solution for them tackle this problem.
If those who are drawing million dollars of salaries can't really came out with the solution, they can make reference to those western countries such as waiving GST for those basic food, necessitates, medical expenses and children products for Singapore citizen - a scheme for Singapore citizen to claim back GST.
But in the end it's a judgment call. I have no doubt those drawing million dollars of salaries have already looked at and considered it. -
pirate:
I wish they would have thought about it 2 decade ago.3Boys:
I would agree we have underinvested significantly in healthcare. But then, all countries struggle with the issue of healthcare funding. Is there a benchmark? I suppose we can use a few, but in my view, an outcomes benchmark is more important than a spending benchmark.
Yes! A spending benchmark is putting the cart before the horse.
Again, this is their oversight! -
3Boys:
Alamak! The highlighted parts expressed with very little enthusiasm or conviction. Cannot leave it to time la. Must plan ahead and have conviction.From Vivian Balakrishnan....
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151186762841207&set=a.10150136201901207.284720.30332546206&type=1&theater
Political suicide vs Demographic extinction.
I would prefer to have a smaller population of foreigners in our Singapore but ......
We are facing the crisis of our lifetime. Our citizen population will halve every two generations. But that is a 'long' term problem. The real emergency is not babies, but ageing. That is why the population will increase in the short term before the inevitable decrease in the long term.
We are one of the fastest ageing nations in the world. By 2030, the number of senior citizens older than 65 years will triple to 900,000. Who will look after us? Today, we have almost six working-age citizens for every senior. In 2030, we will only have two. Even if we suddenly have an epidemic of babies now, they will only be 17 years old in 2030. Hence, we will need some kind of 'top up' over the next two decades - foreigners to work with us, care for us, pay taxes and to help create opportunities. Actually even 1M extra foreigners will still mean far less young people supporting seniors than today. However, I believe we must learn to do more with less. Actually, I hope we will need fewer foreigners. Only time will tell. In the meantime, it is essential that we start building ahead of demand and re-organise ourselves to ensure that our quality of life is enhanced and our children continue to have even more opportunities in a vibrant Singapore.
Our main focus must be the hopes, dreams and fears of our current 3.2 M Singapore citizens and our future children. Everyone and everything else is secondary.
The headline numbers and the speed of change are scary - but we must keep our cool and decide confidently as one people on our future destiny regardless of politics. That is why the government is taking such a big political risk in publishing http://population.sg/
BTW, I found this lecture by Prof Hans Rosling fascinating.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8 — with Vivian Balakrishnan. -
Irrelevant:
To me, Huge defence spending is completely wasting money! Even South Korea is spending lesser money per soldier than us. They should cut defence to very minimum.
Of course you didn't. However, so far you are too shy to disclose the amount you have in mind and so I'm still waiting for your answer. I have it on good authority (from several doctor friends) that our healthcare system works and at a reasonable cost, compared to UK, US, Canada, etc. Can we improve further? Of course. I believe we can probably spend up to another 3-5 billion (1 to 1.5% of GDP) in healthcare annually without affecting our financial position significantly.WeiHan:
Did I just use developed countries as a benchmark? I showed a table which shows the data for all countries. Singapore ranks among the last even when comparing with developing countries and many oppressive regimes. It reflects badly about how this gov treats its citizens.
As for defense spending, I provided a list of data and nothing more need to be argued. Singapore spending on defense is almost 4% of GDP. To put it perspective, a few countries in war mode spend less than 3% on their defense (Taiwan, South Korea).
As for defence, I will not begrudge Mindef over their budget. Based on what I can see, our men in green are reasonably cost conscious. I certainly wouldn't want the lives of my loved ones to be imperiled in the battlefield, just because someone randomly decides that maybe we should spend less and end up with inferior equipment or a less than ready armed forces.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login